Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NTSB: Chalk's seaplane had cracks in both wings

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 07:00 PM
Original message
NTSB: Chalk's seaplane had cracks in both wings
Edited on Mon Jan-09-06 07:01 PM by Scurrilous
<snip>

"The Chalk's Ocean Airways seaplane that crashed last month had fatigue cracks on both wings, according to a preliminary report released today by the National Transportation Safety Board.

Investigators almost immediately identified the cracks on the plane's right wing, which broke away when Flight 101 crashed into the ocean near South Beach on Dec. 19. The new report was the first indication of similar damage on the left wing.

"Fatigue, unfortunately, is a pretty insidious thing," said Grant Brophy, a private air-safety inspector and director of flight safety and security at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. "This is an issue which any operator of this aircraft would need to look into, not just commercial operators."

All 20 people were killed when the 58-year-old Grumman G-73T Turbo Mallard crashed shortly after taking off from Watson Island on its way to Bimini. Investigators quickly focused on the metal fatigue, but insisted it was premature to assign blame."

http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/13585376.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because they juiced it up with those turbo props
plus the high cycle usage plus the aircraft age. Landings on water (waterings?) are much more stressful on an airframe than those made on actual ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It IS interesting.
I'd like to see the NTSB study, after they finish. The increased stress only occurs for landing cycles. But may have contributed to a decreased number of cycles due to a lowered cycle fatigue limit. If I recall, aluminum doesn't even have an infinite fatigue limit. It's just the number of cycles for a given load. Corrosion may have also played a role.

These kinds of things are just surfacing now. The number of cycles is being reached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I'm surprised they didn't catch it on the annual or 100 hour
Is that a 121 carrier? or 135? don't think I've heard...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. a 58 year old commercial aircraft?
are you joking? that doesn't sound like much of a good plan. Yes, I know there are plenty of antique aircraft out there, but unless every piece has been removed and replaced, that's a lot of fatigue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC