Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Federal Judge in N.Y. Is Second to Block New Abortion Law | NY Times

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 03:38 PM
Original message
Federal Judge in N.Y. Is Second to Block New Abortion Law | NY Times
Federal Judge in N.Y. Is Second to Block New Abortion Law
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Published: November 6, 2003


Filed at 2:40 p.m. ET

NEW YORK (AP) -- In a ruling that could have coast-to-coast effect, a federal judge Thursday blocked the government's new ban on certain late-term abortions -- the second court victory for abortion-rights advocates since President Bush signed the law.

U.S. District Judge Richard Casey granted a request by the National Abortion Federation and seven doctors to block enforcement of the ban.

The ruling applies only to the plaintiffs, but it could have broad application. The federation says that its members perform half of the abortions done nationwide.

The decision follows a separate ruling Wednesday by a federal judge in Nebraska who also blocked the ban -- less than an hour after Bush enacted the law. That ruling covers four doctors, who together are licensed in 13 states across the Midwest and East, and their staffs. A San Francisco judge has also scheduled arguments in a similar challenge.

More at the New York Times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is going to end in the USSC
And chances are it will be struck down...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes
I understand that the SC ruling in Stenberg v. Carhart, challenging the Nebraska statute banning the procedure, involves almost the exact same mandate as this law Bush just signed. It was voted down 5-4 in the Nebraska case. I think if the SC does accept this case, which they may very well not, it will be defeated. It will be a great victory for women--I expect that people like Randall Terry will soon have to just insist on this to their wives and slink away from trying to force it on all American women and his wife may not even listen to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I so agree with you
It will be a great victory. I'm also not sure if the Supremes would take this case. There is still hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. I am glad to see that the doctors involved in these procedures
are fighting back. We can not let bush* and his rightwing fundies win on this issue. This is only the first step in their master plan to overturn Roe v Wade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alapolitical Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. A victory for womyn's rights in this day and age is rare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC