Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Evangelical churches accused of illegal political activities

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 06:48 AM
Original message
Evangelical churches accused of illegal political activities
Edited on Mon Jan-16-06 07:34 AM by Algorem
http://www.cleveland.com/newsflash/cleveland/index.ssf?/base/news-22/113740284260360.xml&storylist=cleveland

1/16/2006, 4:07 a.m. ET
The Associated Press

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — Local clergy from nine mainstream denominations have accused two evangelical churches of illegal political activities involving an Ohio candidate for governor and want the Internal Revenue Service to investigate, The Columbus Dispatch reported Monday.

The 31 religious leaders met Sunday night and signed a letter asking the IRS to determine if the churches should lose tax-exempt status over what they claim to be improper campaigning for Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell, a Republican.

The Rev. Rod Parsley of World Harvest Church in Columbus and the Rev. Russell Johnson of Fairfield Christian Church in Lancaster improperly used their churches and affiliated entities for partisan politics, according to the complaint to be faxed to IRS Commissioner Mark Everson...


The complaint alleges that Blackwell was the only gubernatorial candidate showcased in church-sponsored events conducted by Parsley and Johnson. It also alleges that the evangelists' voter-registration campaign was done to support Blackwell and "biased" voter education materials were distributed by the churches for Blackwell's candidacy...

Churches could face IRS probe
Pastors Parsley, Johnson exploited pulpits to play politics, ministers’ complaint alleges

http://www.dispatch.com/news-story.php?story=dispatch/2006/01/16/20060116-A1-00.html

Monday, January 16, 2006
Mike Harden and Joe Hallett
THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH

ADAM CAIRNS | DISPATCH

More than 30 local pastors last night officially accused two evangelical megachurches of illegal political activities.

In a rare and potentially explosive action, the moderate ministers signed a complaint asking the Internal Revenue Service to investigate World Harvest Church of Columbus and Fairfield Christian Church of Lancaster and determine if their tax-exempt status should be revoked.

The grievance claims that the Rev. Rod Parsley of World Harvest Church and the Rev. Russell Johnson of Fairfield Christian Church improperly used their churches and affiliated entities — the Center for Moral Clarity, Ohio Restoration Project and Reformation Ohio — for partisan politics, including supporting the Republican gubernatorial candidacy of Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell.

The complaint asks the IRS to seek a court injunction "if these churches’ flagrant political campaign activities do not cease immediately." It was signed by 31 pastors from nine denominations during a meeting last night at the North Congregational United Church of Christ in Columbus and was to be faxed late last night to IRS Commissioner Mark W. Everson...


Group Seeks I.R.S. Inquiry of Two Ohio Churches

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/16/national/16church.html

By STEPHANIE STROM

Published: January 16, 2006

A group of religious leaders has sent a complaint to the Internal Revenue Service requesting an investigation of two large churches in Ohio that they say are improperly campaigning on behalf of a conservative Republican running for governor.

In their complaint, the clergy members contend that the two Columbus-area churches, Fairfield Christian Church and the World Harvest Church, which were widely credited with getting out the Ohio vote for President Bush in 2004, have allowed their facilities to be used by Republican organizations, promoted the candidate, J. Kenneth Blackwell, among their members and otherwise violated prohibitions on political activity by tax-exempt groups.

They are asking the I.R.S. to examine whether the churches' tax exemptions should be revoked and are requesting that Mark W. Everson, the federal tax commissioner, seek an injunction to stop what they consider improper activities.

Both churches denied that any of their activities violated limitations on nonprofit political activity. "We endorse values, but not candidates," said the Rev. Russell Johnson, Fairfield's leader...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. any church that campaigns for anything
should lose it's tax exempt status, including but not limited to Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson and the rest of the sleaze.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brer cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. but but but...IRS is really busy trying to keep the working poor
from getting their earned income tax credits. Surely they don't have time to take on Falwell, Robertson, et al. for mixing a little politics in with their religion. After all, these guys have the money and clout to fight back. Nah, much better to use their time busting the working class. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KDLarsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
42. Aren't some of them already back to paying taxes?
Edited on Mon Jan-16-06 09:15 PM by KDLarsen
I thought I heard something about the 700 Club having giving up its tax exempt status, so they could continue to spout their hatred of Democrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. NO!
I'm shocked!

Yeah, shocked that they've gotten away with this horse-shit so long before someone called them on it. Each and every one of these churches gave up their tax-free status when they started preaching from the pulpit. They'll try to hide their political activities better from now on, but they'll never stop. They want the church to BE the state and they're dangerously close. bush has been their champion in this regard, with "faith based" this and "faith based" that. Our founding fathers wanted separation of church and state for a reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. I sure hope these churches are investigated
and found guilty of illegal political activities. This stuff has gone on long enough, with the government totally looking the other way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Not looking the other way.........
encouraging it! No wonder they love bush so much, he's aided and abetted in dissolving the line between church and state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is the part I love
Local clergy from nine mainstream denominations have accused two evangelical churches of illegal political activities involving an Ohio candidate for governor and want the Internal Revenue Service to investigate, The Columbus Dispatch reported Monday.


There is no way the Repug spin machine can spin it those evil Dems...... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. You Forget
The Repukes own the media, and they will spin this, just like they've started attacking Congressman
Murtha, and just like they attacked Max Cleland.

They will figure it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. I agree. This is the only way these nasty GOP Fundies can be fought is
by other Christians. Once normal Christians realize, in large numbers, that Freakie Fundies hate them and they begin to tell them they are going to hell too for their beliefs like my freaky Fundie family has told my normal Christian family members for twenty years now, these Freakie Fundies are going to feel the wrath of the rest of normal Christians for their wrongheadedness. It's well past time real Christians stood up and took a stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #20
40. "Other Christians?"
I recently saw a bumper sticker that said "The Christian Right is neither." My opinion is that the GOP fundies should be denounced as the slime that they are by Christians. Period. The fundies are not Christians - they are motivated by hate and greed. They no more represent Christianity than Islamic extremists represent Islam.

Take the bile that the fundies spew, translate it to Arabic, replacing Christian with Islam and vice versa, and it would be indistinguishable from jihadist decrees...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 05:05 AM
Response to Reply #20
50. "Real Christians"
I'm all for your sect going after the fundies, Leesa.

But it remains the case that the fundies draw their authority from the same text you do. And in many respects, your more moderate version of Christianity is a fairly modern invention; theirs is actually closer to the strict and violent creed present in the puritan pilgrims (though twisted through the centuries into a quasi-materialist mutation).

So I'm not sure who is the more "real" Christian. But as I say, don't turn the other cheek. :-)

P.S. Here's a delicious essay on the evolution of American Christianity--"The End of Innocence," by Richard Lichtman--a seminal read:
http://counterpunch.org/lichtman07102004.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #50
52. "fundies draw their authority from the same text"
doesn't have to do so much with the text, but with interpretation thereof.

...Bush draws his authority from the same text (the law) as other presidents do...

I think that being christian or not, real or otherwise, drawing authority from one text or another isn't really the point - what matters is the fruit of people's labor; the effects of their actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. well, conservative christians asked for a culture war
and now they getting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Bring it on!
I just couldn't resist using that line.
These people have had this coming for the last 30 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. They didn't count on it being an internal war, though!
Fine, let the bastards eat their own...once they start flinging shit at each other, they'll all end up covered in it.

Works for me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. i think they want war with whomever they see as a threat
to their inclinations --

see, they are in a state of crisis -- the rapture hasn't come, the temple in jerusalem hasn't been rebuilt, the {second}coming of the messiah hasn't happened -- and we are well into the new millenium -- with every day more so -- they NEED an external enemy.

they've been building this enemy in an ''out of the closet'' fashion since reagan.

it's just not entirely up them what the out come is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ebdarcy Donating Member (654 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. Good.
I don't know anything about Rev. Johnson, but I live 15 minutes away from World Harvest. Rod Parsley is the poster boy for right wing religious whack-jobs. He's a conman, plain and simple.

My sister worked with a girl who belonged to World Harvest. The girl asked her to attend a service. And my sister, who's a tad bit naive, agreed to go. She came home freaked out. She said it reminded her of a cult.

A few tidbits about World Harvest. They have an ATM in the lobby. I don't know if that's common elsewhere, but I've never heard of that before. Their sports teams are called the warriors. (Jesus would be proud, I'm sure.) And the illustrious John Ashcroft spoke there last month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Welcome to DU ebdarcy!
Glad to have you here :hi:

I don't believe that I've ever seen an ATM in a church before :shakeshead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Jeez you must live close to my end of town...I went to SCHOOL
with that idiot..he is worse than a con man
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
31. Love that... An ATM in their lobby! Start plaiting the cords of
Edited on Mon Jan-16-06 04:21 PM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
that whip!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazarus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 04:07 AM
Response to Reply #9
49. ATM in the lobby
Hmm. I seem to recall Jesus doing something with moneychangers in a temple a while back. These folks don't even know their own scripture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
10. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
13. I knew it and called it with a prayer...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=147792&mesg_id=148113

Also note, went to school with Rod...scammer then, scammer now, among other things
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
15. This is the way to take them down
It has to come from inside, anything else won't work. Religion, especially Christianity is so divided into sects, I don't think that one branch could ever really take power, they've got 57 varieties and nobody is going to truly dominate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
18. What about Progressive churches? Do they ever advocate politically?
I am not defending or criticizing here--but I have to ask:

Do the progressive churches ever advocate for their views? Will we still celebrate when they are harassed by other churches? We feel a legitimate (I think it is legitimate, anyhow) discomfort in this country with any linkage between church and government, but, I have a really hard time getting too enthusiastic when I see this kind of stuff beginning.

Churches hold a 501C3 IRS status and that is what allows them to be exempt from federal taxes. That same 501C3 status precludes them doing any political work.

Property tax exemption is a local matter, and that falls to the states and municipalities to determine status. Depending on the local standards, certain activities are allowed while others are not. You have GOT to keep that in mind as you read my comments--OK?

A lot of 501C3 holders are religious based organizations. Along with the churches you also have organizations that provide several different types of activities including stuff like local consumer advocacy groups, social service groups, human rights/social justice groups, and even organizations like community access radio and television stations.

We are unhappy to see certain churches out there featuring conservative candidates. Are we equally unhappy to hear the local community access radio station put progressive candidates on the airwaves?

While I understand (and share in) the frustration with fundy groups that are politically active yet protected by that Federal tax exemption, I also see a lot of other groups that will come under fire along with those fundy churches. This is a slippery slope, and it scares hell outta me to think about who all is gonna come under attack next.

------

THAT preceding section was based on the Federal IRS exemption. Now, let's look at the local exemption issues:

Local tax exemption is just that--locally driven and locally controlled. (By local, I mean state level or lower.) Property tax exemptions are local. When you think about churches getting all those "tax breaks" you are most likely thinking about that big building and all the grounds that they don't pay property taxes on.

My personal feeling is that the groups that are openly doing political work in spaces that are given public subsidies (property tax exemptions) need to be monitored at a local level, not at a Federal one.

I'll guarantee that those groups are gonna be a lot less likely to ignore the rules about political activity if they feel that somebody locally is watching it. Many religious institutions are struggling to make ends meet anyhow--and the threat of paying local property taxes might just be enough to keep them on the "straight and narrow."

Just my two cents...


Laura
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. I'd hardly count "gays are people too" or "help the poor" or "be tolerant"
as political campaigning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. I wouldn't either.
We are not disagreeing here.

I seriously feel that local tax exemptions need to be addressed as well for these groups. One article mentioned that the local GOP had used the church for meetings--yet they never paid rent. THAT is an issue, IMO, right along with the minister inviting the GOP candidates into that church to speak.

I also have extreme issues with any church--be they conservative or liberal--using the pulpit for political reasons. I understand that to many people, the church IS their moral center and a candidate that complies with the church is desirable. However, I feel the church violates a trust when they endorse anyone.

While I understand that these guys really don't CARE what the laws are, (or what Laura thinks) there IS a very serious cash incentive to at least TRY and comply with the law if they know they may have to pay property taxes on the building and the land.



Laura
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
19. If they blaspheme so demoniacally against the law of God, they
are certainly not going to respect the laws of men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baby_mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
21. Dog accused of licking own balls. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #21
46. but now that dog's in the middle of the street ... under the streetlight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ridgerunner Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
22. It seems that too many of these folks missed this passage
Matthew 6:24 "No one can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and money."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. .. and this one:
"And now, suppose that a man has the worldly goods he needs, and sees his brother go in want; if he steels his heart against his brother, how can we say that the love of God dwells in him? My little children, let us show our love by the true test of action, not by taking phrases on our lips. That proves to us that we take our character from the truth, and that we shall be able to satisfy our consciences before God." John I, 3, 17-19.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
23. Mr. Bush** -- rebuild this wall!
There's been a wall between church and state since the founding fathers, who knew best. It's a shame that it was up to the churches to file a complaint, the IRS should have been on this without any prompting needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
24. Get out the PROBE!
It's about damn time! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
25. Like the criminal enterprises that they are ...
these churches will never pay a dime in taxes.

If found taxable by the IRS, they would disband and reform under another banner.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
26. also, did they receive any 'faith-based' funding?
or were HOPING for some as a result of their campaigning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #26
48. I've always felt that 'faith-based' money = illegal campaign contributions
Funnel $$$ to churches looking for the quid pro quo of preaching the gospel according to gop. Preacher man knows his $$$ is linked to him preaching for or against the political issues/candidates as dictated by the gop. How can it be any more transparent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
27. The whole Republican party is nothing but lawbreakers
These Mega Churches are nothing more than fronts for the GOP and their illegal acts are becoming as common as snow in January...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
29. That's great that its the clergy calling for this inquiry
because that was one of the reasons for separation of church and state - that political partisanship would make the people lose faith in the church as a religious institution.

They should also look into the churches revealed in the Abramoff memos, where they were directing the pastors to turn out their congregations to do bidness for Abramoff. Pretty disgusting. IMO, pastors who knowing direct their congregations as political action groups definitely deserve to lose their tax exemption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
32. Sweet! My church is hosting a Separation of Church & State seminar
in April. I'll be keeping my eyes on this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatsFan2004 Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
33. Fair is fair. A number of black churches were similarly "tattled"
on for showcasing DEM candidates only. It is only fair that these churches be looked at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 03:08 AM
Response to Reply #33
47. Thanks for looking out for the "moral" aspects.
Edited on Tue Jan-17-06 03:11 AM by Judi Lynn
Sometimes we forget to blame everyone who might have it coming, right?

It would be good to learn more about the "tattling" on black churches you feel need a good long investigation, instead. Do you have any links?

On edit:

Which Republican candidates do you think they should have showcased? Which Republicans are noted for their pro-integration views? It wouldn't be Trent Lott, would it? Strom Thurmond? All the rest of them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daftly Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
35. More mixed feelings
What about when Jesse Jackson goes on a campaign tour through Southern Churches. Black (mostly Democrat leaning) churches have held a good deal of political influence for a long time in many communities. Do we now ban every political candidate from speaking in churches, or even making a tour of the largest ones in a swing county? Be very careful what we wish for because this could jump up and bite us. Even in heavy blue areas, many churches hold a good deal of political clout. When you swing that bat, watch out for the rebound.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Charlie Brown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #35
45. Jackson is an ordained minister
and no one is saying he can't talk about social problems or positions, just that he can't endorse candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indy_Dem_Defender Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
36. Is anybody surprise by this
kind of thing anymore? I must tip my had to the christians who contact the IRS. I saw some body said one of these Church's has a ATM machine in the lobby, that's pretty crazy there. I once went to a friend's church where they had on the back of the program a breakdown on a graph the cost of operating the Church monthly and I thought that was tacky!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
37. Same thing happens in Iowa
I heard that members of a Baptist reform church resign after the last election because the preacher advocated voting for AWOLbush during mass.

I was thinking of joining the church for the next election cycle to spy on them(legally).. I would like nothing better than to have their tax exempt status revoked if true..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
38. "PIMPS IN THE PULPIT" is what an African American Pastor called them at a
Freepress voters right event .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JudyM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
39. Any tactic to ruin Blackwell is fine with me. He was largely responsible
for Bush taking Ohio in '04, remember... as OH Sec of State, he straightjacketed the democratic voting process in OH a number of significant ways. Filthy beyond description.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
41. It shows Bush used the Churches and the ministers to get the
votes!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
43. Bravo!
:applause:

And it is wonderful that the charges are coming from other churches, as this makes the charges more likely to stick than if they came from non-religious people. It's about time these underhanded a$$wipes were held to account for their crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
44. It's about damn time. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
51. Fight the American Taliban!
The fundies are the enemies of our ancient liberties, and they are, as Jane Smiley observed last year in Slate, virtually unteachable.

I see no reason to kowtow to them, or to sit by why they pull down the Jeffersonian wall and foist their hideous anti-science upon our schools or their grisly social strictures upon our lives.

This is the American Taliban we're up against. They will impose a savage medievalism upon us if left unchecked. Fight!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC