Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Diplomats Will Be Shifted to Hot Spots

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 01:04 AM
Original message
WP: Diplomats Will Be Shifted to Hot Spots
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said yesterday that she will shift hundreds of Foreign Service positions from Europe and Washington to difficult assignments in the Middle East, Asia and elsewhere as part of a broad restructuring of the diplomatic corps that she has dubbed "transformational diplomacy."

The State Department's culture of deployment and ideas about career advancement must alter now that the Cold War is over and the United States is battling transnational threats of terrorism, drug smuggling and disease, Rice said in a speech at Georgetown University. "The greatest threats now emerge more within states than between them," she said. "The fundamental character of regimes now matters more than the international distribution of power."

As part of the change in priorities, Rice announced that diplomats will not be promoted into the senior ranks unless they accept assignments in dangerous posts, gain expertise in at least two regions and are fluent in two foreign languages, citing Chinese, Urdu and Arabic as a few preferred examples.
...
Separately, today Rice plans to unveil a restructuring of U.S. foreign assistance, including announcing the nomination of Randall L. Tobias as the new administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development. Officials said Rice plans to elevate the USAID post, giving Tobias -- a former Eli Lilly chief executive who now heads the administration's global AIDS relief program -- an office and a planning staff in the State Department. Rice will designate Tobias as having a rank equivalent of deputy secretary of state.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/18/AR2006011801937.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. VIDEO-Scary, Scary, Scary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoSunWithoutShadow Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. Nice try, Condaliesalot.
Edited on Thu Jan-19-06 09:33 AM by NoSunWithoutShadow

The diplomats/Bush cronies will never stand for this.

(Edit: this was already kicked.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. sauron's eye is focusing elsewhere in the empire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Suich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. Oh, horse feathers...like this is really going to happen.
Somehow the idea of the US diplomat to, say, Italy or France, getting sent to Iran or Syria, doesn't sound at all plausible.

And the "foreign language" requirement is pure BS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newswolf56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. Fascist or not, the requirement for fluency in two foreign languages...
is the most vital and radical change ever imposed on the U.S. diplomatic corps. Alone among the great nations, U.S. diplomats are archetypes of our national ignorance, arrogantly indifferent (if not overtly hostile) to local customs, smugly refusing to learn the languages of the nations in which they are stationed. Note in this context the (true) scene in Syriana in which the Arab prince notes that Chinese diplomats have taken the time and trouble to learn Arabic -- something that (until the Rice edict) no U.S. diplomat would ever take the "trouble" (exactly now the diplomats themselves think of it) to do. The Ugly American, the brutally true Lederer/Burdick novel, made a similar point in 1958, and in its aftermath, Eisenhower attempted a Rice-like reform. But the diplos are so well connected -- so high up on the corporate hog -- they kept the reforms from happening. Be interesting to see if the same thing happens again: my guess is Rice's demands, like Eisenhower's before her, will eventually come to nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Unfortunately, you're probably correct. . .
that this edict will come to nought, though I agree the requirement to know at least one language other than English is paramount to any effective foreign policy objective -- even George W's, where the diplomats have to work twice as hard since their boss doesn't know his own language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. Diplomats Will Be Shifted to Hot Spots--WaPost
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/18/AR2006011801937.html?referrer=email

Diplomats Will Be Shifted to Hot Spots
Rice Also Plans to Elevate USAID Chief

By Glenn Kessler and Bradley Graham
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, January 19, 2006; Page A01

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said yesterday that she will shift hundreds of Foreign Service positions from Europe and Washington to difficult assignments in the Middle East, Asia and elsewhere as part of a broad restructuring of the diplomatic corps that she has dubbed "transformational diplomacy."

Rice noted that the United States has nearly as many State Department personnel in Germany -- which has 82 million people -- as in India, with 1 billion people. As a first step, 100 jobs in Europe and Washington will be immediately shifted to expanded embassies in countries such as India, China and Lebanon. Many of these diplomats had been scheduled to rotate into coveted posts in European capitals this summer, and the sudden change in assignment has caused some distress, State Department officials said.

Officials said that ultimately as many as one-third of the 6,400 Foreign Service positions could be affected in the coming years.

SO WHO HAS PISSED OFF MISS THANG? WHAT WILL THEY DO WITH ALL THOSE PATRONAGE APPOINTMENTS? WHAT ABOUT THE KIDNAPPING OF DIPLOMATS MOVED INTO ONE-MAN MISSIONS ON THE STREETS? WHAT ABOUT THE DETERIORATION OF RELATIONS WITH THOSE CIVILIZED NATIONS WHO ARE STILL TALKING TO US?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. The Plot Thickens!
Some lazy editor combined the above with this little nugget:

"Separately, today Rice plans to unveil a restructuring of U.S. foreign assistance, including announcing the nomination of Randall L. Tobias as the new administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development. Officials said Rice plans to elevate the USAID post, giving Tobias -- a former Eli Lilly chief executive who now heads the administration's global AIDS relief program -- an office and a planning staff in the State Department. Rice will designate Tobias as having a rank equivalent of deputy secretary of state.

Anticipating such a change, some outside the government have warned that it could result in a greater politicization of foreign assistance. "We're concerned that the same priority won't be given to long-term development as resources are siphoned to support shorter-term diplomatic or military objectives," said Jim Bishop, a senior officer of InterAction, the largest coalition of non-governmental U.S. aid groups.

Rice has described the notion of transformational diplomacy as a shift from merely reporting on events to influencing them to foster the growth of democratic states worldwide.

Under the plan outlined yesterday, Rice will expand the U.S. presence by encouraging the spread of new one-person diplomatic outposts, now located in a few cities such as Alexandria, Egypt, and Medan, Indonesia. "There are nearly 200 cities worldwide with over 1 million people in which the United States has no formal diplomatic presence," Rice said. "This is where the action is today."

The move is intended to bring U.S. diplomats -- now often barricaded in fortified embassies -- closer to the mood in the streets."


Who wants to be a diplomat (target for terrorists)? Is this the answer to the falling recruitment levels at the military?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. You know that's interesting. Won't that make all these guys easy targets?
Would a few dead diplomats help pump up the War on Terror?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Che_Nuevara Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Also, troubled nationals abroad
can't take sanctuary in a one-man diplomatic shack.

More hostages taken, more people to bomb?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. This has nothing to do with weeding out troublemakers, nothing ... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. *'s cronies in diplomatic positions in Europe won't want to go & actually
work for a living
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
13. I'm sure it'll be as successssssfull as Rumsfeld's "tranformational" crap
lighter, more agile forces with a smaller footprint! Shit, we're gonna revolutionize the way wars are fought!

(oh... fuck...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. "Political hijack" fear over US aid shake-up (Rice "reorganizing" world)
Edited on Thu Jan-19-06 06:37 PM by UpInArms
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/b6750782-8926-11da-94a6-0000779e2340.html

The Bush administration on Thursday appointed Randall Tobias, a retired pharmaceuticals executive, to the powerful new position of director of foreign assistance, in a move officials said would subordinate US overseas aid programmes to the broader policy objectives of government.

Mr Tobias, a big donor to the Republican party who heads the US global anti-HIV/Aids campaign, will run a combined $19bn (€16bn, £11bn) budget and also replace Andrew Natsios as head of USAID, the US agency for international development.

“The resources we commit must empower developing countries to strengthen security, to consolidate democracy, to increase trade and investment, and to improve the lives of their people,” Condoleezza Rice, secretary of state, said in announcing the overhaul of how the US runs its aid bureaucracy.

Mr Tobias’s appointment requires Senate approval. He will have a rank equivalent to deputy secretary of state and report to Ms Rice, who is driving what she calls “transformational diplomacy” with the aim of changing the world.

But development organisations are concerned that USAID, created by President John F. Kennedy in 1961, will lose its independence and that development assistance will become hijacked by a short-term political agenda driven by the “war on terror”.

...more...

(edited to fix subject line)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Tit for tat.....or
the Reagan Iran/Contra redux.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. "You scratch my Gannon, and I'll scratch yours." BushCo culture of
corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC