Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Unemployment claims drop 36,000 from last week to 271,000

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 08:48 AM
Original message
New Unemployment claims drop 36,000 from last week to 271,000
Edited on Thu Jan-19-06 08:51 AM by papau
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/newsfinder/pulseone.asp?dateid=38736.3544589699-857798719&siteID=mktw&scid=0&doctype=806&property=symb&value=&categories=&

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) - First-time claims for state unemployment benefits plunged to their lowest level in almost six year in the latest week, the Labor Department reported Thursday. The number of initial claims in the week ending Jan. 14 fell 36,000 to 271,000. It's the lowest level since the week ended April 15, 2000. The drop was unexpected. The consensus forecast of Wall Street economists was for claims to rise 7,000 to 316,000. The claims data are very volatile this time of year. The government's statistical seasonal adjustment factors cannot completely smooth out the massive swings in seasonal employment in December and January.

January 19, 2006 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE WEEKLY CLAIMS REPORT

SEASONALLY ADJUSTED DATA ("seasonal adjustment factors cannot completely smooth out the massive swings in seasonal employment in December and January" - from Marketwatch above).


In the week ending Jan. 14, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 271,000, a decrease of 36,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 307,000. The 4-week moving average was 299,000, a decrease of 12,000 from the previous week's revised average of 311,000.

The advance seasonally adjusted insured unemployment rate was 2.0 percent for the week ending Jan. 7, a decrease of 0.1 percentage point from the prior week's unrevised rate of 2.1 percent.

The advance number for seasonally adjusted insured unemployment during the week ending Jan. 7 was 2,534,000, a decrease of 158,000 from the preceding week's revised level of 2,692,000. The 4-week moving average was 2,655,500, a decrease of 24,000 from the preceding week's revised average of 2,679,500.

UNADJUSTED DATA

The advance number of actual initial claims under state programs, unadjusted, totaled 438,385 in the week ending Jan. 14, a decrease of 116,581 from the previous week. There were 467,862 initial claims in the comparable week in 2005.

The advance unadjusted insured unemployment rate was 2.5 percent during the week ending Jan. 7, unchanged from the prior week. The advance unadjusted number for persons claiming UI benefits in state programs totaled 3,169,948, an increase of 14,730 from the preceding week. A year earlier, the rate was 2.6 percent and the volume was 3,342,292.

Extended benefits were available in Louisiana during the week ending Dec. 31.
http://www.dol.gov/opa/media/press/eta/ui/current.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Whatever
These numbers are all faked and covered up. I can't prove it, however, because much of that evidence too, has been covered up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKthatsIT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. I agree..all BUSH statistics are BOGUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. This line says it all.
The number of initial claims in the week ending Jan. 14 fell 36,000 to 271,000. Which tells you that they are only counting people making claims and not the unemployed or the under employed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Very true - but the initial filing number is a "trend" indicator n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sure....and next month it will be through the roof...the month after it
will go down again. Up and Down...Down and Up...and all if it misleading based on "their statistics" which are manipulated according to the way the political wind is blowing that month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I suspect Gulf coast closed state offices adjustment has ended n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. Sure...
that's the number who ran out of benefits- they aren't counted once benefits end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. No - that is initial -new- filed 2 weeks ago - claims, As to the overall
Edited on Thu Jan-19-06 10:06 AM by papau
unemployment rate calculation, that is done by a different group that uses interviews (much like polling) and has 6 variations on the numbers based on just how hard you are looking for work.

The largest/highest unemployment rate number is generated by a variation called U-6 and gives unemployment numbers between 8.5% and 10.5% and is now around 8.6%.

http://www.bls.gov/webapps/legacy/cpsatab12.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC