Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Rice Explains Aid Restructuring to (concerned) USAID Employees

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 10:23 AM
Original message
WP: Rice Explains Aid Restructuring to (concerned) USAID Employees
Rice Explains Aid Restructuring to USAID Employees
By Bradley Graham and Glenn Kessler
Washington Post Staff Writers
Friday, January 20, 2006; Page A02


Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice faced a barrage of pointed questions yesterday from employees at the U.S. Agency for International Development, who expressed concerns that an administration move to centralize the management of foreign assistance will weaken the agency and place short-term political goals ahead of long-term development aims.

Rice took the unusual step of holding a town-hall-style meeting with hundreds of USAID employees after announcing the creation of a high-level State Department position to oversee all foreign aid programs.

Rice said the position -- director of foreign assistance -- is intended to bring greater coherence and efficiency to a broad patchwork of often overlapping assistance programs that now total about $19 billion. Randall L. Tobias, a former pharmaceuticals industry executive who has headed the administration's global AIDS program for the past 2 1/2 years, was named to fill the position and also to serve as the new USAID administrator.

The moves eased fears at USAID that the agency, set up in 1961 under President John F. Kennedy, would be merged into the State Department. But it prompted other worries, voiced in the questioning, that USAID's strategic planning role might end up diminished and that the agency's corps of experienced foreign aid specialists might be superseded by Foreign Service officers.

In her nearly hour-long appearance before a standing-room-only crowd gathered in the cavernous Andrew W. Mellon Auditorium next to USAID headquarters, Rice offered assurances that USAID will continue to play a key role in setting development strategy and that the administration will maintain a long-term view on development issues. "If we have a short-term perspective, we will fail," she said....


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/19/AR2006011903003.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Rice Appoints Political Sycophant to Head U.S. Foreign Aid Efforts"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. calling Tobias a former pharm industry exec is putting it mildly
Edited on Fri Jan-20-06 03:03 PM by cosmicdot
Chairman Emeritus of Eli Lilly and Company is more precise.

What kind of job did he do as US AIDS coordinator? Who benefited?

Is the Hoover Institution directing its former Fellow (CondiLIAR lying again)?

Sorry Sen. Lugar, but saying he's qualified because he's worked in 'big organizations' and on what you described as 'complicated programs' aka corporate CEO/multi-company Board Director background doesn't = Public Servant. It probably means he's highly experienced in destroying organizations from within; and, profiteering.

Why isn't a career USAID person promoted to this job? Why a Bu$h donor Republican activist corporate crony?

Anything this think-tanked-corrupt-gov't-destroying cabal (and, that's describing them mildly) does is suspect. What are they really trying to achieve? Just being a JFK program is probably incentive enough to Bu$hify it.

I'll conjecture: to destroy its mission, and anything good it might be achieving which might be contrary to this White House's and its handlers plans; and, of course the Money, too, must be a motive.

From the USAID website, it says it "works in agriculture, democracy & governance, economic growth, the environment, education, health, global partnerships, and humanitarian assistance in more than 100 countries to provide a better future for all"

... doesn't sound like Bu$hCo, does it?

They're going to ruin and destroy everything they can. It's going to be a mess to rebuild.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC