Loonman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 01:37 PM
Original message |
Fox Threatens Charges After Staff Salaries Leaked |
omshanti
(851 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 01:39 PM
Response to Original message |
1. what is it about FOX and suing lately? |
damnraddem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
22. Apparently, this crazy fox ... |
Drifter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
but Suing themselves. They are going to self-destruct.
If releasing salaries would cause an "uproar", then there is probably something wrong with them (i.e. unfair).
Cheers Drifter
|
meegbear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 01:40 PM
Response to Original message |
walkon
(919 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 01:47 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Is this against the LAW? |
|
I can see the company getting upset - but turning leakers names over to authorities? There has probably been more time and effort to find these leakers already than for the Plame leaker(s).
|
Muddleoftheroad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Revealing proprietary information |
|
Can get you sued and easily fired. (You should be, actually.) But what law are they breaking?
|
NoKingGeorge
(442 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. Can't be illegal or haynutty would be in trouble. |
|
Haynutty released an internal document (he received stolen property or violated interstate laws in transporting stolen property) and he did not get fired. O'liar will sue when he sees' everyone makes more than him.
|
jiacinto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
21. Not sure if it is illegal |
|
But Fox does have the right to fire them. Most employment is "at will"--that is, if a company wants to let you, they can do it "at any time" for "whatever reason". Meaning--that if they didn't like the way you looked, or if they simply didn't like you--they can fire people whenever they want. The only exceptions are race, sex, and sexual orientation; but even then, given some of the rulings from the Rehnquist court, proving these claims is all but impossible.
|
Mixxster
(653 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
29. "The only exceptions are race, sex, and sexual orientation..." |
|
Actually, only 12 states have laws barring discrimination based on sexual orientation. In most places, you CAN be fired simply for being gay.
|
LiberalFighter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
34. Are these celebrity employees or the grunts? |
|
If they are the celebrity employees then they will have contracts and can't be fired unless a clause includes that as a reason.
The state where the employee conducts their employment will determine whether they are at-will employees. If it is New York I would guess that it is not at-will.
In addition, I seem to recall that there was a leak of salaries possibly in California and the court ruled against the company.
|
Tom Yossarian Joad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 02:00 PM
Response to Original message |
5. LOL! Great! Poor Faux. |
SlavesandBulldozers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 02:01 PM
Response to Original message |
6. "trial attorneys are a major problem in this country" |
|
oh, wait, here they come now, uh - hi guys we got another frivolous lawsuit for you to tend to.
|
beyurslf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
SemperEadem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
31. doesn't it have something to do with contributing to price fixing |
|
for services?
I'm like most--the truth will set you free...
|
Loonman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
FAUX and rightwingnuts always have their lawyers on speed dial.
|
htuttle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 02:03 PM
Response to Original message |
9. "Instant karma’s gonna get you" |
|
"Gonna knock you right on the head..."
|
BuckeFushe
(797 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. BBBBBBBBBAAAAAAWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH |
Cocoa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
Edited on Fri Nov-07-03 04:18 PM by Cocoa
they sue Franken, his book takes off.
they go after NPR, NPR gets $200,000,000 from Mrs. Kroc.
Maybe these leakers will win the lottery. :-)
|
loudnclear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 02:06 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Well, who is going to leak it to the rest of us? |
|
How do you like leaks now, FOX? Certainly there is nothing to damage the national security in knowing the salaries of the FOX News staff. But then, they don't want to remind the dittohead audience that they are really part of the wealthy elite in this country and that they really have very little in common with the dittoheads whose minds they have brainwashed. I mean, afterall, how would it go over to keep reminding that audience that Rush was a durg addict earning over 16 million annually? Day after day, night after night, that message would soon have a dire affect on the ditto heads.
|
juajen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
19. Hey, I love that typo! |
|
Can I use it? It sounds much better to say "durg addict" than drug addict. I'm serious. Sorta a cross between dirty and drug. It's great.
|
0007
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 02:09 PM
Response to Original message |
12. You mean they pay those clowns? |
BuckeFushe
(797 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 02:13 PM
Response to Original message |
13. I think it's funny that the internal memo warning everyone was leaked... |
Zephyrbird
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 02:15 PM
Response to Original message |
14. whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa???? |
|
There are laws on the books against knowing everybody's salaries??? Hey, that's news to me!
Salary information wouldn't be considered proprietary intellectual property (it does not benefit Fox monetarily the same as PIP covers a company's scientific findings, for example), and even if it were, it would subject you to perhaps firing or civil penalties, not criminal.
whaaaaaaaaaa? Fox New is just trying to play its stupid games. Treat them the same as they do any liberal who dares to step out of line: threaten, intimidate, subject them to penalties.
Pretty soon they'll be blathering about how anti-American it is to know salary information.
feh! I pick my teeth at Fox News. Bullies.
|
PapaClay
(297 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 02:15 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The CFSC.
(Circular Firing Squad Channel)
I luv it!
:evilgrin:
|
qanda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 02:18 PM
Response to Original message |
16. It's okay to leak the name of CIA operative, |
|
But you better not give out how much some loon at FOX makes, because it could be harmful to our national security.
|
Loonman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
18. ..and a memo that means, well, nothing earth shattering |
JPace
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 02:32 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Nobody cares what your staff makes.....and furthermore would you quit tying the courts up with your "frivolous" lawsuits?
Gads!!!! you guys are soooo touchy.
|
Unknown Known
(829 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 02:42 PM
Response to Original message |
23. You can give out troop locations |
|
but not Bill O'Lielly's salary.
Fox "Through The Looking Glass" News:puke:
|
truthisfreedom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 02:46 PM
Response to Original message |
24. so, who's got 'em? the list, i mean? 8^) |
BiggJawn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 02:49 PM
Response to Original message |
25. "Intellectual Property", perhaps? |
|
But this is FAUX...FAUX and "Intellectual" are 2 words that should NEVER be used together....
I know the outcome of this. The world will now know that FAUX values large, jiggley breasts over education....
|
leesa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 03:05 PM
Response to Original message |
27. Yet another frivolous lawsuit. |
xultar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 03:11 PM
Response to Original message |
28. Well what is good for the goose is especially good when the |
|
goose is cooked.
Hey Hanutty...you leak you get leaked on. That sounds fair to me.
Toodles
|
bushisanidiot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 04:13 PM
Response to Original message |
30. Another Fox Frivilous Lawsuit!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! |
proud patriot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 04:25 PM
Response to Original message |
33. Sue Happy Republicans |
|
Sick ....Talk about a frivilous lawsuit ..
|
SideshowScott
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 05:57 PM
Response to Original message |
35. Tonight on Fox: Only Libirals cant file dumb lawsuits! |
|
man who ISNT fox sueing! LOL... You never know they might win one one day. Fox news gets what Fox news deserves if you ask me
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Apr 20th 2024, 12:09 AM
Response to Original message |