Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Paul Martin to step down as leader of the Liberal Party of Canada

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:16 AM
Original message
Paul Martin to step down as leader of the Liberal Party of Canada
Edited on Tue Jan-24-06 12:17 AM by HuffleClaw
link to follow. (from live concession speech)

http://www.cbc.ca/story/canadavotes2006/national/2006/01/23/mainelecstory060123.html

"...Liberal Leader Paul Martin said he was stepping down as leader."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. have the fascists won the election & canada is going neocon? ugh nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Hardly.
The Pukes here won a Minority Government. They will be voted out pretty quick.

Martin is 67, I think he is tired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClusterFreak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Naw...
Minority government....Harper's Conservatives on a short leash. Not to worry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mazzarro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. Maybe you should not bet on it!
The same was said of b** in 2000 with controversial election and the rethugs found a way to bulldoze their way through and impose their agenda on the country. Same thing may happen in Canada - not that I sure of it; but it still could happen especially if the US neocons step in behind the scene to advise the Tories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puzzler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 04:13 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Not with the parliamentary system...
... there is no executive branch of government, as with the US. Even though Harper has the title of PM, in the legislative sense he is just like the leader of the Senate or House of Representatives. Also, Harper does not have a working majority... which means he needs the votes of the other parties to get ANY legislation passed. And, to make matters worse for Harper, all of the other parties in the house (whom together, outnumber Harper's party) are to the left of Harper.


-P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mazzarro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Glad to know that!
I hope that the neocons do not come out with another tactic to undermine the normal process of governing in Canada - that's my fear!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. It's not as bad as had been feared
As of this writing, the breakdown in Parliament is 124 Conservative, 103 Liberal, 51 Bloc Quebecois, 29 NDP, and 1 independent. This means that even the Conservatives plus the NDP don't add up to the 155 majority necessary to set an agenda -- and that alliances in the new Parliament will probably be ever-shifting from issue to issue. And, as a result, George W. Harper might not be nearly as powerful as he had hoped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. i think the liberals one saving grace was martin
he was far far more professional on the campaign trail than harper. and his immediately stepping down as leader really show he's more interested in the future of the party than his own self interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. Martin needed to step down, Canadians didn't really like him
or trust him the way they did Chretien with all his own foibles. Martin ran a very poor campaign this election in comparison to the 04 election and I am glad the Libs are going for new leadership, depending on who they choose.

If they go by way of Frank McKenna or John Manley, they will not gain back any support, if they go elsewhere it could get very interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Hardly...
Conservatives won a less than strong minority. Martin leaving the Liberals opens up the opportunity for some new blood. NDP had a very strong showing.

All in all, not as bad as had been predicted.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. It is only a minority government
Harper is a long way from having a free hand. He needs the cooperation of at least one other party to actually pass legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Join us in the Canada forum and get the real goods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ MEW Donating Member (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. The liberals there are caught up in scandals
Edited on Tue Jan-24-06 12:23 AM by DJ MEW
involving kickbacks for government contracts.

I believe Canada is more of a liberal country, the people voted conservative because the other option was corruption
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. ANY option is a vote for corruption.
It goes hand in hand with politics. My fellow Canadians who voted against the Liberals because they didn't want corruption in federal politics are little better than morans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. well if a person takes a big shit on your face, what else are you
going to do. hell people around here talk about not supporting dems if they don't filibuster alito.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilber_Stool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. I feel much better now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. Martin must step down.
A new leader must take the lead now and win the next election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
16. The platform of the so-called conservative party in Canada
certainly is not a platform our conservatives would ever take up. It includes improving environmental laws, tightening up campaign finance laws and lobbyist kick-backs, helping the elderly poor, fiscal responsibility, increase government access to information and resources. Just the opposite of what the repukes in the US stand for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. that's just a front for the campaign.
Steve Harper has a history of supporting far right wing policies. He even went onto Fox "News" Channel to apologize for Canada's opposition to the Iraq War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. LOL, that is definitely NOT their agenda! Quite the opposite!
They will trash the Kyoto agreement (environment), reduce the ability of unions to participate while increasing business influence in campaigns (campaign finance laws), reduce taxes on the rich and dump them onto the middle class and poor (the elderly, poor), bring back the discrimination of gays, reduce the right of choice for women.

What part of that REAL agenda is unlike the repukes in the U.S?

The good thing is the Harper faux Con minority won't be able to implement any of their extreme agenda because Canadians put a collar with a VERY SHORT leash around his neck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
17. OK Canada, you are off the list
no money from me. No visits. Nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
19. I guess Canada got tired of progress, surplus and peace.
They wanna be just like us now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_eh_N_eh_D_eh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Not by a long shot.
Edited on Tue Jan-24-06 12:03 PM by C_eh_N_eh_D_eh
The Prime Minister of Canada is not analogous to the President in your country; as far as real work goes, the job is more like the House Majority Leader (we don't have an elected Senate, before you ask). And for Harper, it's not even a real majority. Even if he packs the Cabinet with his cronies - and he will - the other parties between them can swing more than enough influence to keep him in check.

Paul Martin was a great Finance Minister ("Secretary" to you), but he couldn't handle sitting in the big chair. He's like the DLC of the Liberal Party. Here's hoping the Grits get a Howard Dean in time for next year's election.

Edited for grammar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
21. That God you guys have a parliamntary system.
You guys can No-Confidence Harper if he tries anything cute. We, unfortunately, can't do the same with *.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
22. Hopefully it's now Anne McLellan's turn
I just haven't quite figured out how it will all work. She lost her seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. That was one loss I was happy with, in all honesty!
She was working hand in hand with the bush government on reducing Canadians' right to privacy versus the bush agenda under the euphemism of border security. I hope she just goes back to private life for good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC