Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Editing tips from the NSA (retro to the point of funny. Our Gov't at work)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 08:10 PM
Original message
Editing tips from the NSA (retro to the point of funny. Our Gov't at work)
Hiding confidential information with black marks works on printed copy, but not with electronic documents, the National Security Agency has warned government officials.

The agency makes the point in a guidance paper on editing documents for release, published last month following several embarrassing incidents in which sensitive data was unintentionally included in computer documents and exposed. The 13-page paper (click here for PDF) is called: "Redacting with confidence: How to safely publish sanitized reports converted from Word to PDF."

Instead of covering up digital text with black boxes, it is better to delete any information you don't want to share, the NSA suggested.

"The key concept for understanding the issues that lead to...inadvertent exposure is that information hidden or covered in a computer document can almost always be recovered," the NSA wrote in the Information Assurance Division paper, dated Dec. 13 but only recently posted to the Web. "The way to avoid exposure is to ensure that sensitive information is not just visually hidden or made illegible, but is actually removed."

The unintended disclosure of metadata, resulting in high-profile leaks of secrets, has led to red faces at businesses and government bodies in the past. In March 2004, a gaffe by the SCO Group revealed which companies it had considered targeting in its legal campaign against Linux users.

More: http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-6030745.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. I handled a lot of redacted material in 2001-2004
Mostly fairly non-sensitive stuff from the AFSC. But the "redaction" was, frankly, piss-poor.

I clearly received cheap photocopies of photocopies of reports that had been blacked-out. I could hold them at an angle to the light and read evverything. :eyes:

Fortunately it was usually names of contractors or other things I wasn't interested in. Hopefully things have gotten better.

I doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 05:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. If the American bureaucracy is in charge of it, you know that the system
is...

Never mind.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
byronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is totally funny. Oh my God. This should be in a movie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
megatherium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. This is the agency that measures its supercomputers by the acre,
and is the largest employer of PhD mathematicians in the country. Pretty funny indeed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murphymom Donating Member (443 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. reminds me of a joke
How do you know when your boss has been doing his own typing?

When there's white-out on his computer screen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kineneb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. nah, that is a blond joke
I have it in my collection...add to that permanent marker on the screen to black out text...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is an absolute stitch
it also shows how attuned we are to the illusions of what we're doing on a computer screen versus what's actually taking place under the surface.

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edward Copeland Donating Member (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
8. Speaking of the NSA...
The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times and Knight Ridder have all picked up on Glenn Greenwald's excellent work exposing the Bush Administration's hypocrisy about FISA.

I've got links to all three versions on my site:

http://edwardcopeland.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 05:34 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Welcome to DU, Edward.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC