Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Friendly's slashes health benefits for 454 workers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
ckramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 09:21 PM
Original message
Friendly's slashes health benefits for 454 workers
The new plan provides a maximum annual benefit of $2,000 for outpatient care, and covers only a small portion of the costs associated with major illnesses. Under the plan, employees could be liable for thousands of dollars in bills after a short hospital stay, leading some to seek free care from the state. Until last fall, the company offered them comprehensive healthcare insurance.

Gary Claxton, director of the healthcare marketplace project at the Kaiser Family Foundation, which says it provides nonpartisan analysis of health issues, said limited-benefit plans have widespread financial impact.

''When people on these plans get sick, they're going to go to the hospital and they're not going to be able to pay -- or they will pay and they'll lose their homes," Claxton said. ''Ultimately, it will hurt the families and the healthcare institutions."

link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pfitz59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not very friendly of them!
........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. what is Friendlys? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jschurchin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sit down restaurant and................
Ice cream joint. They also package ice cream for sale in grocery stores.

Think about this, these are people making minimum wage or maybe a little more. They cannot afford to get sick, thanks to our fearless nazi regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Chain of Restaurant's back east...
...sort of like Swenson's in the west. Ice cream is their specialty, burgers, etc. Not fast-food, sit down. Not great food, either, but a hit with kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
henslee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Home of the Fribble.. a part of my childhood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. With the money that's gone wasted for the Iraq War
There could already be a solid foundation built for a national health care system. Our $$$$ = Bush cronies' riches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. No more Friendly's visits for this kid. Screw them.
I won't support these thieves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. We need to do something about this growing problem.
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 10:30 PM by drm604
People need to know what's going on. We need a campaign. Billboards, full page ads, maybe TV and radio spots. Imagine a billboard something like this (this is a very rough draft):

  • Albertson's
  • Friendly's
  • GM
  • Ralph's
  • Safeway
What will YOU do if your employer
decides to cut YOUR health benefits?

The Republicans don't care.

VOTE DEMOCRATIC.

It obviously needs some work (and it doesn't look great in bb code) and we could come up with a better and longer list of companies that have cut benefits.

At the very least, it should get people discussing the issues and, hopefully, it will force the Republicans to talk about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Shut em down!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. They don't even worry about the symbolism
making them personally or the system in general appear so cruelly ridiculous. We has restaurant across the way that had the name "Family Restaurant". They fired a waitress for getting pregnant and being unable to work. I met the person who runs the joint. Let's just say there was no incongruity except in the word on the sign.

Cannibal capitalism gone mad and staffed accordingly with mankind's "finest".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CAG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
11. This stuff is inevitable if healthcare costs continue their unsustainable
growth. The bottom line is that if costs continue to grow annually at the 8-15%, a full 4 to 7 times inflation, that this will continue to become an increasing part of everyones budget, whether its the employees or employers portion of the health insurance premium, and/or each taxpayer's tax share to take care of medicare, medicaid, and other indigent care.

The blame doesn't lie with the employers, its in the actual cost of the health insurance premiums, thanks largely in part to overwhelming charges coming in from the healthcare providers (hospitals, clinics, physicians, pharmaceutical companies).

Nothing, not even socialized medicine, is going to solve this as long as costs grow at a rate well over inflation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. A large part of those costs
consists of insurance company profits, overhead due to the staffs medical offices need to handle all of the insurance paperwork, and the cost of uninsured people going to the much more expensive ER rather than a doctor's office. All of this extra cost could be eliminated or greatly reduced with a single-payer system. My understanding is that Medicare's overhead is very small, something like 3%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC