Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Support Weak as Americans Favor New Direction, Poll Finds

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 04:26 PM
Original message
Bush Support Weak as Americans Favor New Direction, Poll Finds
Jan. 27 (Bloomberg) -- President George W. Bush will address a nation next week that has soured on the direction of the country and his leadership on issues ranging from health care to the economy to Iraq.

A Bloomberg/Los Angeles Times poll taken this week as Bush prepares to deliver his annual State of the Union speech shows that the president wins the approval of only 43 percent of the public, a 7-point drop from a year ago. Three out of five say America is seriously off course, and by 62 to 31 percent those surveyed want to move in a different direction than the one Bush has set forth.

The president has lost public support across a broad swath of issues, including most of the ones that especially concern Americans, as well as on matters of personal trust and leadership, according to the survey.

``Presidents who lose their credibility, who lose the ability to persuade people that they're leading the country in the right direction, have a tremendous political burden to overcome, and that's where he's at,'' said Robert Dallek, a retired Boston University professor who has written nine books on presidential and diplomatic history. He said the modest goals Bush is likely to set forth in his speech next week reflect the fact that ``he's not any longer at the top of his game. His political capital has been expended.''

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=washingtonstory&sid=aLH_qReYSQGc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. "political capital has been expended"...what capital?
The rat bastard robbed the American people of TWO General Elections!

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. His "Politcal Capital" One Card is maxed out n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. It sure as hell has!
Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. It only had about $300 on it, anyway
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. So now is the time to push for a filibuster!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. His political capital has been expended.''
I guess we got this here gynormous mountain of debt and dead bodies to show for it.
Square deal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. His political capital, like our treasury, has been expended.
Bushie, you're doin' a heck of a job.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. i think many are just plain tired of hearing his name!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
51. Dictator 43 is a new phrase I have coined. I think Dictator 43 is more
appropriate than using his real name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Send this article to Senate Dems and Chaffee along with NO ALITO vote.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Forget "political capital", more like "political deficit" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Conker Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. Do you guys think his approval ratings will go up after his...
State of the Union address?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. What's he going to say that he hasn't said before?
What's he going to promise that he hasn't failed to deliver already?

How's he going to "inspire" the American people when he can only use words of one or two syllables, and only about two dozen of those?

This will be his fifth year of bullshit, and there's no more fresh bullshit left to spread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Conker Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. He will probably keep defining "Domestic" and "International" again, and..
Edited on Fri Jan-27-06 05:49 PM by Conker
like you said, he will most likely speak about what he has failed to promise before.He has done it other times, and it worked.I still think the average American is dumb enough to still follow Bush, which is really sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Normally, his ratings go down after each speech he gives.
It's the annoyance factor. Just as people are starting to forget what a prick he is, he goes on TV and reminds them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beltanefauve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. Annoyance factor, indeed!
Have you noticed how his voice has gotten increasingly whiny and grating in the last year or so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #24
56. Actually, I have noticed the whiny thing.
He sounds despareate and frightened. As well he should. He is headed for a premature ejection from the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yeah? They'll get one hell of a new direction with Alito on the court
Looking forward, I see the corpse of America's once-great constitution and an eviscerated body of legal precedent rotting in a judicial wasteland populated by knee-jerk reactionaries and bush crime family cronies with lifetime appointments. If the people think they're "seriously off course", they just haven't looked at where we're headed. Oh we're on course all right, just where the neo-cons and theo-cons we allowed to take the helm want us headed. </mini-rant>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gizmo1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
14. They have their agenda and they
will stick to it.They don't care what people think,in their minds they are doing great work and laying the foundation for the republican future a future that doesn't include us.We must defeat the repugs soundly in Nov.and get rid of these s.o.bs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ECH1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
16. Does this mean he isn't going to get Sclito through?
Does it mean that he isn't going to get his war with Iran?

If it doesn't mean either of those two we still have major problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. Well.....
that was a small wad. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
19. He borrowed his capital and the note is due. He's going to have to file
bankruptcy. HA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
20. Fraud only yields capital for so long
Edited on Fri Jan-27-06 10:25 PM by teryang
The essence of his rule is fraud. His policies favor only the corporate rich while they are always cloaked in the faux populist clothing: patriotism, the flag, the ten commandments, abortion, terra, terra, terra.

His elections have been fraudulently rigged and without legitimacy.

The war was based on calculated fraud.

His legislative agenda is the institution of dictatorial rule, not protection of liberty and freedom as fraudulently claimed.


I heard a very conservative news clone on CNBC say "hasn't he gone to that (national security fear thing) well once too often?" A day or two later the phony bin laden audio turned up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
21. His "capital" is a high interest loan and the note has been called in.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
22. The sheep are a little Fn' late.
We are stuck with this asshole for another 3XX years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
23. It would have been nice if they felt that way...
I don't know, a fucking year ago!

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:43 AM
Original message
LAT (poll): Bush's Ratings Sink, but Trust Remains (worst #s ever)
Bush's Ratings Sink, but Trust Remains
By Ronald Brownstein, Times Staff Writer


WASHINGTON — As President Bush prepares for next week's State of the Union address, he faces widespread discontent over his job performance and the nation's direction that could threaten his party in the 2006 election, a Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll has found.

In the survey, 43% of Americans said they approved of Bush's performance as president — his weakest showing ever in a Times poll.

He received even lower marks for his handling of the economy, healthcare and Iraq — especially from women, who the poll found had turned against him on several fronts. And by a 2-1 ratio, those surveyed said the nation needed to change direction from the overall course Bush had set.

But most of those surveyed believed Bush's policies had made the nation more secure. And a plurality say they trusted him more than they did Democrats to protect the country against terrorism — advantages that could help Republicans defend their House and Senate majorities in November.

The poll found a majority still willing to take tough steps to reduce the risk of terrorism — including surrendering some of their civil liberties and supporting military action against Iran if it continues to advance toward developing nuclear weapons....


http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-poll27jan27,0,510814.story?coll=la-home-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
25. A "Bloomberg" poll? 43%! Shrub's been in the 30's, or lower
for months. Let's get REAL. I know it's tough, but...no more "40%" or higher, pleeeeese!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:43 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. And "trust remains."
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
26. That's because corporate media covers up the FACTS on Bush's incompetence
in the war on terror.

If the people only knew the truth about what Bush's policies have created around the world they would be appalled.

If they knew how badly Bush screwed up and allowed 9-11 to happen despite specific warnings - If they only were told about PNAC.

Thanks alot, Brownstein - YOU and your cronies WILL NOT TELL THE PEOPLE.

Heckuva job, Brownie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:43 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. And they do a pretty good job of burying domestic incompetence...
or at least not stopping the buck on Bush's desk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
29. Dems will not win elections as long as the 'trust' factor is high.


But most of those surveyed believed Bush's policies had made the nation more secure. And a plurality say they trusted him more than they did Democrats to protect the country against terrorism — advantages that could help Republicans defend their House and Senate majorities in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
30. I am more worried of dying from a medical crisis than a terrorist strike.
Speaking of protection from terrorists, what would happen to most people? Would they get health care, or would they end up crippled or with lifelong problems because of injuries, unable to get a job and no compensation?

Let the Dems talk about that, too. People think if they get hit, they die. Ain't true. Many live on, with horrible disfigurement. Will bush protect them from that? Who will take care of their families?

They talk out of both sides of their mouth. First, Repubs say they are better at protecting us. Then they turn right around and say another attack is highly likely. So, if it's highly likely, than what good does it do us for Repubs to be in power?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Punkingal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
31. It's a sad state of affairs if we have to rely on that buffoon
To protect us. He doesn't make me feel safe. And furthermore, I don't believe he would give a shit if half of us died. Witness New Orleans and Katrina. He wasn't worried about those people, now was he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
32. that "trust" thing
http://www.thirdreich.net/Thought_They_Were_Free.html

excerpt:

What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, little by little, to being governed by surprise; to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if he people could understand it, it could not be released because of national security. And their sense of identification with Hitler, their trust in him, made it easier to widen this gap and reassured those who would otherwise have worried about it.

"This separation of government from people, this widening of the gap, took place so gradually and so insensibly, each step disguised (perhaps not even intentionally) as a temporary emergency measure or associated with true patriotic allegiance or with real social purposes. And all the crises and reforms (real reforms, too) so occupied the people that they did not see the slow motion underneath, of the whole process of government growing remoter and remoter.

...more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:43 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. Excellent quote. Thanks!
Fascism happens gradually, and by design.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorkiemommie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #32
42. thanks for the post

and the link!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
33. I can't get my head around people saying
that Bush's policies are working "because we haven't been attacked."
This is sheer lunacy.
Our borders, ports, chemical plants, airlines, water supply are just as vulnerable as before. Possibly more so due to the illusion that security is higher.
We haven't been attacked because it's not our turn.
Terrorism is at it's highest levels ever worldwide.
And the Mideast is becoming more dangerous to our country every day. Bush has united the fundamentalist Islamic fervor throughout the region. Hamas won in a democratic election. Iran is rapidly becoming what Bush told us, erroneously, Iraq was. Pakistan, Syria, and Egypt are also moving toward more fundamentalist politics.
And Afghanistan, remember them?, is a stronghold, again, for the Taliban.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
35. There should be a rule..
that if your #s get too low for too long, impeachment proceedings should automatically begin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
36. The comment that he is trusted for national security is baffling;
We got one of the worst sucker punches in our history, 911, under this idiot's watch and three and half years later he still has not caught the perp (obl) or his main accomplice (mullah omar). Where do you get trust from that? Who the fuck is giving these answers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kierkegaard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #36
48. Short answer?
Karl Rove...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
37. so the dumbasses haven't figured out that * is spending all of his
time strategizing about the next round of lies and obfuscation, "politicking" and deal-making, and none of his time on important matters like national security. The only reason we have not had a major attack again is that it hasn't been necessary to go to quite that length to save the repukes. When it is needed by * and his mafioso, it will happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
38. Trust Remains??? BULLSHTI PROPOGANDA!!! It's a PLURALITY!!!
"And a plurality say they trusted him more than they did Democrats to protect the country against terrorism — "

How can they claim "trust remains" when he doesn't even have a majority on the issue??? Total fucking bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #38
53. calm down, sugar
I trust "you" :D

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
39. People still trust him?
:wtf:?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nookiemonster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #39
44. I believe if the basis was made just on his actions,
a majority would be truly pissed and seriously distrust him. However, the large amount of surrogates that praise everything he does, on a daily basis, keep the sheep in line.

The lack of critical thought and rationalization grates the crap outta me.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorkiemommie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
40. this and the fact that many back an attack on Iran....

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
henslee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
41. Yes. Trust remains. I trust he will cotinue to destroy all he touches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:44 AM
Response to Original message
43. WTF?
Do these people ACTUALLY think that Democrats, or a Democratic Administration, would be "soft" on terrorism. WHERE does this come from?
MOST of the veterans in DC are DEMS.
Dem presidents have seen us through World Wars.

Why do they think we WANT our country to be attacked?

Why do they think that 'pukes are "stronger"?

John Wayne?....Ronny Rayguns?...

Both Bushies are FAMOUSLY wimpy.

The "tough steps to reduce the risk of terrorism" would have been statesmanship and the ability to conduct a world-wide police action to "get" the terrorist cells.

We NEED media spokespeople.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:44 AM
Response to Original message
45. Right...43%, but we trust him...whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:44 AM
Response to Original message
46. Hmmm, why is it Brownstein's articles are always sucking up to
to the bush cabal....wait....I know because he is a bloodsucking bottomfeeder himself. His articles aren't fit to put on the bottom of a birdcage, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:44 AM
Response to Original message
47. You're doing a heck of a job Georgie
you lousy piece of fetid slime. May you rot in hell, after a lengthy jail term and then execution for treason.
Of course, the msm would call that attitude, not sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 03:44 AM
Response to Original message
49. Yeah, didn't the Germans Trust
hitler until it was too damn late?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 04:39 AM
Response to Original message
50. Breaking News: Water Is Wet
Winter Is Cold
Hell Is Hot

::Yul Brenner Voice:: Et-ctetera, Et-cetera, Et-cetera

Let the Jouney Out Of Hell Begin.....

NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MellowOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
52. Maybe people are sick of being lied to
And then watch him blame others or cover up his lies with more lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
54. I have yesterday's LA Times right here
And the SAME poll has a MAJORITY of dumbass Amerikkkans saying they favor a war with Iran even as the same majority says things are going poorly in Iraq.

And the same majority - some 57% - say that they would vote Republican this fall if it means "keeping Amerikkka safe". :nuke:

So they don't mind living with no healthcare, little job security, and fading safe retirement prospects, as long as the fascists give them artificial hope against terra-ists. :crazy: :argh:

We're packing up and heading to Portugal before this regime is through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. they really are setting Iran on simmer right now
I've taken a long break from TV "news" the past month or two, turn on the TV yesterday and everywhere they're talking about it.

and with the polls you just stated, it seems that the sheep are once again bleating for blood.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorkiemommie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. oh, yeah, they're all for it

i only saw maury/connie for a few minutes but seemed like they were getting ready to cheerlead a charge into Iran.

the sheeple have learned nothing, absolutely NOTHing.

are they now willing to commit their children to *'s wars???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
58. The direction * set forth in the first four stolen years was crystal...
Edited on Sat Jan-28-06 05:49 PM by pinniped
clear. The stupid sheep didn't bother noticing because they were enjoying their big tax cut bonus bribe.

This poll should have taken place before the hijack, but then a * victory would have been more suspicious than is already is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
59. Hey, George! "What's In YOUR Wallet?"
Your Capital Is Gone...It's Time That You LEFT OUR CAPITAL CITY for your new digs in TX.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC