Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LAT: Army's Rising Promotion Rate Called Ominous

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 12:35 PM
Original message
LAT: Army's Rising Promotion Rate Called Ominous
WASHINGTON — Struggling to retain enough officers to lead its forces, the Army has begun to dramatically increase the number of soldiers it promotes, raising fears within the service that wartime strains are diluting the quality of the officer corps.
....
The higher rates of promotion are part of efforts to fill new slots created by an Army reorganization and to compensate for officers who are resigning from the service, many after multiple rotations to Iraq.

The promotion rates "are much higher than they have been in the past because we need more officers than we did before," said Lt. Col. Bryan Hilferty, an Army spokesman.
....
But the recent trends in promotions have stirred concerns that the Army is being forced to lower its standards to provide leaders for combat units that will be deployed overseas.

"The problem here is that you're not knocking off the bottom 20%," said a high-ranking Army officer at the Pentagon. "Basically, if you haven't been court-martialed, you're going to be promoted to major."

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-officers30jan30,0,1693991,full.story?coll=la-home-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. "...if you haven't been court-martialed, you're going to be promoted
"Basically, if you haven't been court-martialed, you're going to be promoted to major."

That's great. I'd sure feel confident if I had a kid joining the army that they would have competent leaders :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debau2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. I have to admit
That I love that line. My ex is deployed in Honduras, or rather soldier summer camp!, he and I don't agree on the reasons for his deployment, hence him being my "ex." He is a Captain trying to make Major. He has tried for several years, and NOW. He can ascend to the rank of Major...I may just have to break my silence and send him the link to this article...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
27. So Lynndie England just missed the cut
Too bad for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. this means some soldier are NOT officer material? Be all that you
can be, we're looking for a few good men, etc.

Msongs
www.msongs.com/liberaltshirts.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. "we're looking for a few good men,"...but we'll settle for a few bad men!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. in WWII didn't they have some 19 y.o. generals? (due to high
mortality rates in units)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
1. Informative article about promotion during WWII
at this link (you'll need to scroll down a bit to see the article):
http://cgsc.leavenworth.army.mil/carl/resources/csi/wade2/wade2.asp

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. The youngest division commander studied was 33
But the poster you replied to may have to look at the ages during the Civil War, where 33 years of age would have been considered very old.

George Custer became Brigadier General at age 24, in 1863.

http://www.civilwarhome.com/custerbi.htm


George Armstrong Custer
(1839-1876)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #14
31. Oh, I wasn't arguing age,
I just thought it was an interesting article. I'm an historian, so I tend to go straight for the written word -- but my focus is cultural, not military. What interested me about the article (written by a military historian, literally; a historian who writes for the military) was the discussion of the reasons why promotion patterns changed during the period. I suspect those reasons could be broadly applied to other wars.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Never heard that before but one of the big problems in Vietnam...
was that the officer corps ranks dropped precipitously. See not everyone did what John Kerry did and volunteered and then re-volunteered to do hazardous duty. I don't want to name name or anything...

Seriously this was one of the main problems in Vietnam. It began about 3 years into our heavy involvement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. In my unit incompetent "officers" cost us dearly.
I get pissed off today just remembering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Thank you
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. WWII???
I think you might be thinking of the Civil War. (Custer was a low C West Pointer who was only about 24 or so when he became a general.)
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. Yes, and we all remember what happened to him
and his men....

It wasn't a pretty day for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Had he been in Nam...
he would have been fragged by his own men, Little Big Horn would have been unnecessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davepc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I thought he was well liked by his men.
Just tactically inept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
30. In what army?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Army Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Handed Out Like Candy
Promotions and awards in Iraq, that is. That's one of the incentives to come over here: "Hey, you'll probably get two promotions." It's an open joke among soldiers. I have been promoted once and was treated like a lunatic by my Sgt. Major when I didn't put in for another promotion four months later. "But you'll get it, why don't you want it?"

I'm not an officer though, I work for a living.

But it's military wide. Just crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. If you did seek the extra promotion...
...would that lengthen your stay in the Army?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Army Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #15
28. Not me, I'm IRR
I should have been like the smart 60% of the IRR who ignored the call up. If I had taken the promotion I would be a staff sgt when I retired, but I've only been a Sgt for 8 months. And I only took that because the Army treats lower enlisted like modern day slaves.

Kind of takes the magic out of it when they promote everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. Welcome to DU, Army
I checked out your site - be careful out there, man.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hadrons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. the (thankfully) brief time I was at Ft Sill, only 3 guys were promoted ..
in a year (just after 1987) ... a whole base and just 3 guys got a bump ... funny thing was that the Staff Sgt. in charge of sucking those to enlist (decent guy actually) was bitching the most
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. The World's Only Superpower
Yeah. Sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. This must be Clinton's fault.
Edited on Mon Jan-30-06 01:42 PM by Algorem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
16. well, it's a war
the single best route to promotion is to have the guy above you get killed, wounded or leave the service for some reason. Everytime someone is killed above the rank of Private, someone has to fill that slot. unless you are RIFfing, every time someone leaves the service, someone else gets promoted to that spot. Greater attrition, greater promotion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raysr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
17. Ha, "all chiefs"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. dupe, sorry deleted
Edited on Mon Jan-30-06 03:15 PM by northzax
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. Folks, there's another reason why you'd promote up a lot of men...
Another reason to increase the number of officers in the upper ranks is if you have a sudden influx of new troops in the lower ranks. Before both world wars the army saw rapid promotions among almost all of their officer corps... the most extreme example being Dwight Eisenhower who jumped from light colonel to four star general in a matter of months (not that he didn't deserve it).

Of course here the situation may be just the opposite. A different reason to hand out promotions is to make the guys happier and more willing to stick around when the war is clearly proving to be a drain on personnel (and the mercernary "private contractors" are bleeding off the best of the non-coms from training positions by offering the same work at 10 times the pay).

Dumb shit all around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ama Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #19
32. interesting
If Iran is next will there be a draft?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
23. Oh please...the Peter principle applies to everything
So what if you don't knock off the bottom 20%. I'm sure they will rise faster (which is the fear) in rank then the 20% above them! Just the kind of officers the BFEE needs to keep the Earth 'in line'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
25. Like the Confederate Air Force, everybody's a colonel. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebellious Republican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
29. Lets all give the recruiters a hand, here are some names
They must not be recruiting in the right places, here is where they can find some really gung ho college grads. Just waiting to test their metal, true rabid supporters of the war. With their unwavering patriotism, and support for the war, and in their owns words have said "if they were needed they would go". I am surprised recruiters are not capitlizing on these toe tagable, body baggable young war hawks. :sarcasm:

>snip
Young Republicans Support Iraq War, but Not Willing to Join the Fight
By Adam Smeltz
Knight Ridder Newspapers

Wednsday 01 September 2004

NEW YORK - Young Republicans gathered here for their party's national convention are united in applauding the war in Iraq, supporting the U.S. troops there and calling the U.S. mission a noble cause.

But there's no such unanimity when they're asked a more personal question: Would you be willing to put on the uniform and go to fight in Iraq?

In more than a dozen interviews, Republicans in their teens and 20s offered a range of answers. Some have friends in the military in Iraq and are considering enlisting; others said they can better support the war by working politically in the United States; and still others said they think the military doesn't need them because the U.S. presence in Iraq is sufficient.

"Frankly, I want to be a politician. I'd like to survive to see that," said Vivian Lee, 17, a war supporter visiting the convention from Los Angeles,

Lee said she supports the war but would volunteer only if the United States faced a dire troop shortage or "if there's another Sept. 11."

"As long as there's a steady stream of volunteers, I don't see why I necessarily should volunteer," said Lee, who has a cousin deployed in the Middle East.

In an election season overwhelmed by memories of the Vietnam War, the U.S. military's newest war ranks supreme among the worries confronting much of Generation Y'ers. Iraq is their war.

"If there was a need presented, I would go," said Chris Cusmano, a 21-year-old member of the College Republicans organization from Rocky Point, N.Y. But he said he hasn't really considered volunteering.,"I'm in college right now, but who knows?" said Matthew Vail, a 25-year-old from Huntsville, Ala., who works with Students for Bush. He said he might consider enlisting after he finishes his degree at the University of North Carolina, but not until then.

"The bug may get me after college," he said. http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/090304X.shtml<snip

Here is a website they can find more patriotic types just waiting to be tapped into! http://www.youngrepublicans.com/ More :sarcasm:


Recruiters need our help and support, here are some Ideas to help them get their numbers up!:rofl:

Red Team Special Op "Lucky Strike"


Personnel: Unlimited number of two-three person strike teams.

Equipment: A pack of Lucky Strike cigarettes. Camera.

Location: Marriott Crystal Gateway

Task: Identify meeting wing. Approach entrance looking for College Republicans taking a smoke break. Offer them a Lucky Strike. Tell them, "Lucky Strike was there when we beat Tojo. It'll be there when we catch Osama. Where will you be?" Take photos or videotape.

Caution: End op if asked to leave.

posted by Gen. JC Christian, Patriot | 3:17 AM
Report to the General (0) | The French Respond

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Red Team Special Op "Tikrit Taxi"


Personnel: Unlimited number of two-three person strike teams.

Equipment: Car, camera, two signs with the words "College Republican Courtesy Shuttle to Army Recruitment Center" printed on them.

Location: Marriott Crystal Gateway

Task: Identify meeting wing. Place signs on car. Drive slowly around the entrances to the meeting wing offering rides to the recruitment center (map and directions) to people who look like College Republicans. Photograph or videotape their reactions.

Caution: End op if asked to leave. Be sure that your registration, insurance, etc is up to date. Do not do this by yourself.

posted by Gen. JC Christian, Patriot | 2:57 AM
Report to the General (0) | The French Respond
http://patriotboy.blogspot.com/2005_06_19_patriotboy_archive.html







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC