Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Aide: Reagan Warned Before Beirut Blast

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 11:52 PM
Original message
Aide: Reagan Warned Before Beirut Blast
WASHINGTON - A former defense secretary for Ronald Reagan says he implored the president to put Marines serving in Beirut in a safer position before terrorists attacked them in 1983, killing 241 servicemen.

"I was not persuasive enough to persuade the president that the Marines were there on an impossible mission," Caspar Weinberger says in an oral history project capturing the views of former Reagan administration officials.

Recollections of an initial 25 Reagan aides were released this week by the Miller Center of Public Affairs at the University of Virginia. Altogether, scholars interviewed 45 Cabinet members, White House staffers and campaign advisers in a project begun in 2001, when Reagan was secluded with advanced stages of Alzheimer's disease. Reagan died in June 2004 at the age of 93.

Transcripts offer largely admiring portraits by Reagan's chief loyalists and Weinberger is no exception, crediting the president with restoring U.S. power and outfoxing the Soviet Union.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060131/ap_on_go_pr_wh/reagan_oral_history
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MnFats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Jesus. I remember that: they were sitting ducks. This makes it worse.
Reagan was so deluded he thought the simple presence of U.S. Marines would prompt the warring factions to lay down their weapons.
It was a foggy mission without set goals, strategy or planning.
Reagan pulled the Marines out of there a short time later.
With nothing but dead Marines to show for it.
Goddamn Reagan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MakeItSo Donating Member (351 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'd give him a big kiss on the lips if he were president now
Everything is relative. (I hated him at the time, by the way).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. I would cold cock the bastard if he were here now.
Fuck Reagan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. Time to rename that aircraft carrier
USS Fuckwad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. I'd Thumb His Eyes SInce He Was Always so Blind to Reality
Ignorance doesn't need eyes to see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Soldiers are just pawns to these people. EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
18. reportedly an amiable guy but dumb fuck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. Then came the Grenada invasion
Which a lot of people have speculated was to help the military save face after Lebanon. So, this oversight may be indirectly responsible for that, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
agincourt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Military people still love that asshole,
A conservative always gets a free pass from the military. No matter what happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Knurled99 Donating Member (160 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Bullshit
A conservative always gets a free pass from conservatives in the military, just like he or she would enjoy from conservative civilians. Believe it or not, the military is becoming less and less biased because there is a very diverse bunch enlisting/commisioning. You think we don't notice who fucks up our VA benefits? You think we get all happy when we're sent off to an uncertain fate, whether we think it's for a good cause or not? Most kids joining up these days do it because they need a decent paycheck and a way to pay for college. This is not the hotbed of conservatism it was in the 80's so stop demonizing us ok?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. He Generalized a Bit There
I happen to know a few liberals who served. My father is one... proud Democrat and will never ever vote GOP. Our wholw family knows the score with these traitors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. Diverse and yet very few stand up to defend the Constitution
Yes I do think that the military notices who fucks up your VA benefits!! No, I don't think you get all happy when you're sent off to an uncertain fate!!!

My question as a former soldier and Desert Storm vet, is what are you guys doing about it???

I left the army in 1991, after returning from Desert Storm, and even then VA benefits were being eroded. I've written to my congressional group and the only reply I get is a form letter.

We liberals, both civilians and veterans, can only do so much. I'm afraid that in order to keep this Republic, we will soon have to do what the Founding Fathers were forced to do. The most important question is what kind of support can be expected from your "diverse bunch"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
27. I'm still military and I hate Reagan. Always did.
Who are you to claim to speak for all military peole?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
agincourt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Cause all the one I've met personally ,loved that crooked geezer
But it's great to hear from ones who don't , I stand corrected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. "We can't leave because we're there" -- Where have I heard that recently?
Edited on Tue Jan-31-06 12:15 AM by Bozita
from the article:

But he said one of his greatest regrets was in failing to overcome the arguments that "'Marines don't cut and run,' and 'We can't leave because we're there'" before the devastating suicide attack on the lightly armed force.

"They had no mission but to sit at the airport, which is just like sitting in a bull's-eye," Weinberger said. "I begged the president at least to pull them back and put them back on their transports as a more defensible position."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. Fuck Caspar Weinberger. The Marines' blood is on his hands.
Caspar Weinberger can't escape the scarlet letter of history now. Fuck him. And, goddamn him to hell while I'm at it. i lived through goddamned Reagan/Bush for 12 fucking years. Fuck any Reagan/Bush administration people. Burn in hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MnFats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. well-put. Agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. Trying to make himself look "out of the loop"? He was SOD!!
Got a chance to whitewash his record, with no rebuttal. I didn't like Raygun -- thought he was dangerously simpleminded -- but I don't care for "blame it on the dead guy" either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
9. "outfoxing the Soviet Union"
the only thing Reagan deserves credit for is not starting a war with them as the Chimp would have done if he was in office then.

but the Soviet Union collapsed in large part because of their internal problems along with Gorbachev's policies which encouraged more openness.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
11. Yeah, but he sure kicked ass in Grenada the next day!
Whoo-hoo!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreatCaesarsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
12. didn't reagan/weinberger try to blame the marine commander
for it. and then when they bugged out of lebanon, they said it was a "redeployment."

along with the marines, there were several navy corpsmen who were killed.

there was joke in the '80's - who is israel's defense minister? - caspar weinberger.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
13. And so what does this info do for us now?
Is this more of the same "this type of stuff happened before" type crap? So the repukes can say, "look, business as usual, all presidents are crooked, even the great communicator!"
So therefore we are suppose to shrug our shoulders and say, "oh well"????

How about this: instead of these stupid mother fuckers coming out 20 years after the fact to offer up their version of their own little mia culpa, how about they just do their fucking jobs and question and expose these crooked bastards at the start and save thousands of lives??? Oh that's right, that would require a fucking spine.

Pigs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
16. One (more) small hole in the Saint Ronnie dike n/t
Edited on Tue Jan-31-06 10:05 AM by UTUSN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
19. "I was not persuasive enough to persuade the president ..."
Was he asleep at the time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
21. So that was a LIHOP too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
22. He should have warned the French, too.
"The death toll was 241 American servicemen: 220 Marines, 18 Navy personnel, and 3 Army soldiers. 60 Americans were injured. In the attack on the French barracks, 58 paratroopers were killed, and 15 injured. In addition, the elderly Lebanese custodian of the Marines' building was killed in the first blast; the wife and four children of a Lebanese janitor at the French building were also killed."

But the response is one that's considered classic, and much hoped for:

"In retaliation for the attacks, France launched an air strike in the Bekka Valley against Iranian Revolutionary Guard positions. President Reagan assembled his national security team to devise a plan of military action, and planned to target the Sheik Abdullah barracks in Baalbek, Lebanon, which housed Iranian Revolutionary Guards believed to be training Hezbollah fighters. However, Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger aborted the mission, reportedly because of his concerns that it would harm U.S. relations with other Arab nations. Except for a few shellings from the USS New Jersey off Lebanon, there was no real military response from the United States in response to the barracks bombing; however, the US did become involved in several other fights in Lebanon during their stay.

"The (US) Marines were moved offshore where they could not be targeted, and in February 1984 the Multination Force withdrew from Lebanon. Terrorists saw this as a two-fold victory for their cause, and their activity against Westerners (particularly Americans) increased, prompting various U.S. responses. This event is considered by many to be the beginning of what is now called the War on Terror."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
23. I'm pissed all over again
Why did we not know this until now??? I hate these neocon bastards. All they do is lie and gain power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
24. "I believe it was called 'Terrorists Determined to Strike at Airport'"
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
29. Is it any wonder that * executive ordered Reagan's paper not be released?
* is deep sixing all the Post Watergate era legislation designed to create more transparency in government so that he can pull off all the same crap that Nixon did, in addition to lining his pockets. He HAS to be stopped. Reagan's papers should be in the public domain now, with Poppie's out soon. But little shrubbie has swept them all under the rug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC