Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush: U.S. must break oil addiction (SOTU excerpts released by WH)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:15 PM
Original message
Bush: U.S. must break oil addiction (SOTU excerpts released by WH)

http://today.reuters.com/news/NewsArticle.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2006-01-31T220457Z_01_N30290443_RTRUKOC_0_US-BUSH-SPEECH.xml

Bush: U.S. must break oil addiction

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush will describe the United States as "addicted to oil" in his State of the Union speech on Tuesday night and will urge the use of technology to reduce the dependence.

"America is addicted to oil, which is often imported from unstable parts of the world," Bush said, according to excerpts released by the White House. "The best way to break this addiction is through technology."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. HAHAH.... Bush's speechwriters cribbed off Kerry campaign speeches.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I predicted thisGOP steals rhetoric & offers nothing substantial. Kerry
Edited on Tue Jan-31-06 05:20 PM by cryingshame
failed completely in putting this front and CENTER of his campaign.

This issue was never more than just an also mentioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yep, I stood through three Kerry rallies, and he only gave renewable
energy and the environment only passing references. Most of the time he talked about his time in Vietnam. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. He didn't talk about Vietnam ONCE at any of the rallies I went to
Edited on Tue Jan-31-06 06:30 PM by blm
and spoke of the environment and renewable energy research as a matter of NATIONAL SECURITY.

It was Kerry who started saying that we need to set a goal for renewables the same way as Kennedy set a goal to go the moon many years ago.

I don't believe you could have been listening intently to his speech - I watched every rally that was on Cspan and never heard him only emphasize Vietnam.

Maybe you didn't notice that it was alternative fuels Kerry was talking about when he said that Americans can INVENT their way out of the problem instead of relying on Saudi Arabia.

Maybe BECAUSE he discussed it in terms of national security that caused you to not notice its inclusion.



This article seems to disagree with your view, as well:

Kerry Offers Plan for U.S. Energy Independence
By Thomas Ferraro  |  August 6, 2004

SMITHVILLE, Mo. (Reuters) - With crude oil prices at record highs, Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry on Friday offered a 10-year, $30 billion proposal to move the nation toward energy independence.
In doing so, Kerry charged that President Bush, after nearly four years in office, has failed to confront the energy crunch that threatens the nation's economy, environment and security.

"We have to control our energy future," said Kerry. "No American in uniform should ever be held hostage to American dependence on oil in the Middle East."

About 60 percent of U.S. oil supplies are imported, with about one in four imported barrels coming from Middle East countries like Saudi Arabia.

Kerry promoted the proposal while he and running mate John Edwards campaigned together in America's agricultural and industrial heartland, which has been particularly hard hit with soaring fuel prices.

"We can and will do better," Kerry promised a gathering of about 150 farmers and community leaders at a Missouri farm near Kansas City.

"America will be safer and freer when the resources that fuel our economy are in our hands and when we develop new energy sources in our country," Kerry said.

Under Kerry's proposal, $5 billion would be provided for a research partnership between government, agriculture and industry into fuels made from agricultural waste.

There would be another $10 billion to transform the current generation of coal-fired utility plants into cleaner and more efficient facilities.

TAX CREDIT FOR FUEL EFFICIENCY

In addition, it would provide $10 billion to help automakers retool plants to build high-technology, fuel-efficient vehicles, and give consumers a tax credit of up to $5,000 to buy them.
It would also set twin goals to have, by 2020, 20 percent of the nation's motor fuel and electricity come from alternative sources such as solar, wind, ethanol and biodiesel fuel.

The Massachusetts senator has made energy independence a centerpiece of his White House bid and his proposal fleshed out earlier ones he has promoted during his long campaign.

The cost of the measure would be offset by reinstatement of a tax on polluters and the federal government paying lower energy costs, aides said.
>>>>>>>>>

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/president/kerry/articles/2004/08/06/kerry_offers_10_year_plan_for_us_energy_independence/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. People hear what they want to hear. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. NOOCLEAR POWER--- Maybe the Iranians from Iran-Nam will help
us to get NOOCLEAR POWER
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #27
47. I listen carefully. You are from Florida; tell me EXACTLY what YOU
Edited on Tue Jan-31-06 07:00 PM by Lorien
heard at his rallies; did he say anything beyond "we need to develop renewable energy resources and get off foreign oil-it's a matter of National security" (pound podium with fist). I heard less than two minutes devoted to renewable energy (which got loud applause-that should have inspired more time on the issue)and 20 or more to topics like National security, health care, and especially Vietnam.Even the people around me were whispering about how they were getting tired of the Vietnam references; his experiences were inspiring to some, but I felt he relied far too heavily on it during his those rallies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #47
70. Unfortunately, I
didn't get to go. I'm not physically up to standing for long periods of time - bad back. I read some and saw exerpts of some, so I'm not an expert on his rallies. But, it is true, people do have a tendency to hear what they want to hear. Conversely, if people do not hear enough of what they want to hear, it is unsatisfying. I wasn't really making a comment on what was actually said, but peoples' different reactions to the same thing. I guess I could have said all that in my post above. Sometimes I get lazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #25
40. I was at the last
Kerry campaign rally in Manchester, NH on Nov 2, 2004 and he talked about renewable energy to a crowd of 15, 000! I never did get to see Kerry..the stage wasn't high enough for me :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #25
45. Gee-I didn't even have to click on the post to know who posted it
by that headline. Don't call me a liar; I worked my ass of for that man and I help to ORGANIZE the very rallies I referred to. We all know that you are his #1 cheerleader on this board; you seek out any whiff of disappointment with your man, and then you go on the offense, defending him with a fervor that almost seems obsessive. Sorry blm, but I will never be a fan of Kerry-even though I worked for months on his campaign (because the alternative was far worse). I met the man several times, listened to what he had to say, spoke to him, shook his hand, sat through hour after hour of rallies to make certain the media saw our "support", but he only focused on health care and defense when he was here in Florida, and that simply didn't cut it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. I cited the article that said energy was a FOCUS of the campaign and
Edited on Tue Jan-31-06 07:03 PM by blm
THAT is your reply? An attack on me?

Why don't you stick to proper forum etiquette and reply to the post and the article cited?

And in answer to your jab at me, I will ask you - Why should people telling untruths and mischaracterizing Kerry get a pass from me when I know a wrong is being committed? Doesn't matter to me if the lie is coming from the right or the left - it's the TRUTH that never changes, no matter how boring it is to some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Trust me. I'm an oil man. I'll jawbone the Saudis."
Just remember those words when * starts lying about renewable energy sources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
46. Yeah. Don't believe it.
The Drug Dealer says, "You're addicted to cocaine".

Junkie: "yes, it's true".

You need to do something about your addiction. Even though I'M making a killing off of your pathetic dependence on me.

Trust me when I say this to you.

=======================

Like I would believe anything this man says. Don't forget: Bush is an oil man. Cheney is an oil man. CondaLiar Rice was an executive at Chevron. So are LOTS of other people in this administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InsultComicDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
62. Bush saying we need to break our addiction to oil is like
the neighborhood drug dealer complaining that the kids on his block are a bunch of junkies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nancy Waterman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. If he takes this issue from the Dems
iti s their own damn fault. They should have been screaming about this for years now. Bush has done nothing and most likely this is all talk again tonight with nothing behind it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. The current batch of dems doesn't act, they wait for the GOP to
set forth an issue, then they react to it. This is why we need a unified message, and a person like Lakoff to get all our representatives on that message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
58. Of course they're going to coopt it
They've used their rhetoric to coopt just about every other issue that becomes topical. Thet're going to coopt the troop withdrawl too. And you're right- a lot of it is the Dems fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sounds like it came from the Onion
another case of "we condemn torture"? Sorry, but I don't believe that an entire cabal of oil men (and woman) honestly have any interest in breaking our oil dependency. They certainly don't want green renewable energy, because eventually it would become cheap-and he who controls the energy source controls the world.

Brilliant move, though-stole an issue that rightfully belongs to the Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. how funny is that!
Now let's see him and the rest of the oil cabal liquidate their holdings and put all those bucks in biofuel..retool Detroit to build us some corn oil engines..

Hows' about some REAL R&D bucks for the solar home heating industry..

here ya go:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brotherjohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. So suddenly he's gonna be John Kerry... or, um... Al Gore?
Excuse me while I fall out of my chair laughing...






...
There, I'm back.

From 2004:
"Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry has outlined a 10 year, $30 billion energy plan and said the proposal will "put America on the path to energy independence and create hundreds of thousands of new jobs at the same time." http://www.peopleandplanet.net/doc.php?id=2303

From 2000:
"In his campaign, Gore advocated a program to gradually transition the U.S. away from oil-dependent energy policies." http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/100300b.html

Shall we quote "Earth in the Balance"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Really. What an asshole. He's continued the tax break for
Hummers, cut out the breaks for solar, hybrid cars, geothermal heat systems, etc., and we're supposed to believe he's a big fucking environmentalist now? Jesus. These idiot Repubs BOOED President Carter 30 years ago when he warned us of this same thing, and now we're supposed to think Dipshit McCokespoon just wants to do the right thing??
:puke:

If only the Dems would stand up and laugh uproariously at this farce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
36. I believe that both Gore and Kerry
should give speeches, and say that they are glad that Chimp has belatedly come to accept their proposals. With Gore as president, we could have been well on our way to energy independence; with Kerry, we could have started, at least.

We need to speak out, at every opportunity, to remind people that this is a position the Democrats have held for a number of years. Keep the emphasis on Chimp coming around to the Democratic point of view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. Will the Dems clap or just laugh and roll their eyes?
We actually agree with the statement but the messenger makes the comment ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brotherjohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. Someone should start looking right now to catch him plagiarizing Gore!
Edited on Tue Jan-31-06 05:27 PM by Brotherjohn
I'm serious.

Imagine this headline: "Bush caught plagiarizing Al Gore's 'Earth in the Balance' in State of the Union address".

Wouldn't that be rich?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. His Defense Would Be He Was Thinking This Before Gore Said....
it and Gore plagiarized him. And guess what? The *apologists and RW talking heads will parrot that and the 'Merikun people will call Gore a plagiarist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brotherjohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #18
31. To believe that, you'd have to believe "he was thinking..." (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
48. I hope that the Dems come back with that very accusation. Al Gore had
it right all along, and the GOP is finally waking up to that truth now that their policies have lead us into a quagmire. They'd be wise to listen to the rest of what Gore has to say as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. we could start by inventing a device that converts all the hot air
coming out of Bush's mouth into some kind of usable form.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. he prefers Cocaine/Jack D... .. let see what he suggests as an alternative
Edited on Tue Jan-31-06 05:29 PM by sam sarrha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
14. Come On - Nobody Really Believes Him - He's Only Saying That To....
take the pressure off of the record reported profits of the oil companies for the last quarter. Case in point $10.71 billion in profits for Exxon. This is just another * lie to make it look like he is siding with the 'Merikun people. I understand that the oil execs from the companies were summoned up to Capitol Hill to be grilled by Congress. They decided that they had more important things to do - like gouge the 'Merikun people for the next quarter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Fascinating that he would put it in those terms...
...but I assume that this notion will soon vanish, as have all his other promises/visions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. He ALWAYS gives lip service to this.
And then he throws about $400 million over five years(if it even gets there) that doesn't do anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
19. and he figures this out AFTER he invades country with 2nd biggest oil
reserves.

That's like a crack addict killing someone to get their money then deciding their addiction might be bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazzleDazzle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Nah, he doesn't mean it. He's just putting you on.
OR, to the extent he really does mean it, it's only because there are corporations and corporate fat cats whose pockets he wants to line.

Trust me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #24
44. I know. I was being sarcastic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazzleDazzle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #44
72. There's a smilie for that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
20. This is a major insult to environmentalists. Bush and Cheney
embody the oil corporation in the western world.

Consumption and Torture. Those should be the president's themes tonight; they're the topics he seems to know best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
21. translation: military won't let me invade no more oil countries
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markam Donating Member (146 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
22. Thank God
He doesn't want me to conserve energy. That would definitely be unamerican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
23. The biggest hypocrite in the world, speaks again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
26. If it's like everything else, it will go like this:
"Gotta rid ourselves of that demon oil. Must fund technology." Next budget - cut technology funding, and call it the "Energy Technology Funding Program for the Future."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pschoeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
28. Like the GOP isn't addicted to Oil Money
Edited on Tue Jan-31-06 05:53 PM by pschoeb
and the record profits from oil companies that get shuffled right into GOP coffers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithras61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
29. At least with this addiction he proposes a solution...
that isn't dependant on Religion. Not that I believe he plans to do a damn thing about our oil dependance (as many have pointed out, he's an oil man through & through), but maybe some other options will begin to make it to market despit ehim...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EuroObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
30. Seen the writing on the wall?
...Still a bit late to compete with European and Asian technologies...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
32. Oh that's a good one! And we will get those flying cars by 2008 too right?
What a Moraine. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 03:21 AM
Response to Reply #32
64. Flying cars!
You've touched a sore point with me. I've wanted them since I was a boy.

And who knows? Had it not been for the American appetite for imperial slaughter... With the monies spent on Vietnam and Iraq and the Cold War, we might just have had them.

Not going to happen now, especially in a post-petrol economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
33. And we'll get there through . . . . . HYDROGEN!!!
Yes, that's the ticket!!!

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
34. And we will do this right after the men get back from Mars!
Edited on Tue Jan-31-06 06:17 PM by The_Casual_Observer
It's an insult when the know-nothing jr monkey head starts making claims about "technology".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
35. His Oil buddies know the writting is on the wall.
Big Oil is planning to transform itself into Big Hydrogen and Big Biofuel so they can keep thier political clout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
38. Also in SOTU Address - Bush concedes 2000 Election and resigns
Says to American people "Take this job and shove it!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
39. Liar Liar Pants on Fire !!!
:rofl: I'll bet a million dollars lightning strikes that lying motherfucker down to the floor if he spews that sentence tonight. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. If there were instance Justice..that
would happen in a New York second!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
42. well, if I remember correctly
it was JIMMY CARTER that started talking about this problem THIRTY years ago. I sincerely doubt bubble brain will have any thing new 2 offer except the usual tired rhetoric and platitudes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
43. Tell THAT to Your Buddy Cheney!!!


:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
50. The drug addict in chief


wants to talk about our addictions? Excuse me?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
51. * wants nukes and we've been down that road, there have been no new nukes
built since 1970 or so and for good reason.

Until the nuke addicts solve the problems of waste storage, transportation and security, I say,

NO NUKES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom22 Donating Member (240 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. Actually it was Jimmy Carter circa 1978
who gave this speech. Declared the US would never import over 50% of its oil again. this si sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
53. Why listen to the speech? Just reread Orwell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
54. haha, on Olbermann just now: * seen more than the Simpsons in past weeks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EndElectoral Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
55. This is a joke right? Oil is GW's biggest contributor. Now he gets it?
Where has he been?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jdubb32 Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
56. you give bush far too much credit,
he merely reads from the TelePrompter. It was most likely bush's brain A.K.A. Karl Rove that initiated this incredibly original idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sushi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
57. Another good way
is to take the bus sometimes instead of driving one's car every time. Will * and his family set an example and travel by bus once or twice a week?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
59. This is the last time you'll be hearing this until his next...
lame duck speech.

* and his asshole buddies are addicted so much they start wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
60. remember when heartless said conservation would be a nice
personal choice, but the only thing in the world is to drill drill drill---now it's going to be nuke nuke nuke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
61. FACT; US addiction to foreign oil INCREASED & INCREASING under bush.
Edited on Tue Jan-31-06 11:48 PM by LynnTheDem
And ya know ain't no "msm" gonna bother pointing that FACT out. Why, that would show what a STUPID MFing LIAR bush is. Can't have that.

Sixty-six percent of oil consumed in the United States comes from foreign sources, up from 58 percent in 2000. Americans now spend $200,000 a minute on foreign oil and more than $25 billion annually goes to Persian Gulf states for oil imports.

Energy Information Administration
http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/mer/pdf/pages/sec1_15.pdf

American Progress
http://www.americanprogress.org/atf/cf/%7bE9245FE4-9A2B-43C7-A521-5D6FF2E06E03%7d/ENERGYCHAPTER.pdf

BUSH ENERGY BILL WILL NOT REDUCE RELIANCE ON FOREIGN OIL:

The energy bill signed and supported by President Bush “rejected a Senate provision that required reduction of oil consumption by one million barrels per day by 2015.” Under the bill, “our need for imported oil will continue to grow for as long as models are able to project.”
-U.S. House Committee on Government Reform, 7/05
http://www.democrats.reform.house.gov/Documents/20050726164801-76366.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
63. He should have mentioned conservation, smaller vehicles
Edited on Wed Feb-01-06 12:09 AM by barb162
and higher tax on oil to force the use of smaller vehicles, but then again that's too simple. Start using the tax system that Europe uses and you will see conservation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
65. Well, "addiction" is something Bush knows about! HAHA!!
Ignorant fool, to use that term!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
66. Don't Republicans consider addiction a serious crime.
One so serious in fact that it deserves going around the Constitution in order to find and punish addicts. "The No Knock Policy" is just one I am referring to. This is almost funny. The Oilmen Administration saying we need to not use oil is like the tobacco companies telling us not to smoke....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boilinmad Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
67. I love how.....
....all of us who have been concerned with conservation, and alternate sources of energy, have been regarded by the right wing conservatives as whacked out hippies.....Now that their benevolent leader has "discovered" that our lust for oil is a problem, he's a genius.......Energy from something other than oil, WHAT A CONCEPT....Thanks W!!!!!!!!!! You made Rick Santorum real proud today!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not_So_Right_Wing Donating Member (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
68. America is addicted to oil....
But bush is addicted to being an absolute idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
69. Didn't Jimmy Carter tell us that about 30 years ago?
Before Reagan decided that the energy crisis Nixon, Ford and Carter all prepared for was just a result of us not playing enough games in the Middle East?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
71. Hey, George! You gonna trim down that Presidential motorcade?
Switch to hybrids or SmartCars? Doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC