Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT/AP: Turnaround in Recruiting Puts (Natl.) Guard on Path for Expansion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 08:30 PM
Original message
NYT/AP: Turnaround in Recruiting Puts (Natl.) Guard on Path for Expansion
Turnaround in Recruiting Puts Guard on Path for Expansion
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: January 31, 2006


WASHINGTON, Jan. 30 (AP) — National Guard officials said Monday that recruiting had accelerated so much in recent months that they expected to expand the Guard even as the Bush administration proposes to shrink it.

The National Guard Bureau, the Pentagon office that administers the Guard, issued a statement outlining a turnaround in recruiting and predicting that it would continue to rise this year. In the last quarter of 2005, the Guard signed up 13,466 recruits, above its goal of 12,605. It was the first time since 1993 that the Guard exceeded its goal in that period....

***

Mark Allen, a National Guard Bureau spokesman, attributed the recruiting improvement to a new advertising campaign, a large increase in financial incentives and a near doubling of the number of recruiters, to 5,100 from 2,700.

The Guard, like other branches of the military, had been struggling for recruits earlier in the year. In the 2005 budget year that ended Sept. 30, the Army National Guard fell 20 percent short of its recruiting goal. The active-duty Army fell 8 percent short, and the Army Reserve missed its goal by 16 percent.

The administration's plan to pay for a smaller Guard has stirred opposition in Congress and among groups like the National Guard Association of the United States, which represents current and former Army Guard and Air Guard officers....


http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/31/politics/31guard.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Define "tall" as 5' and I'm a giant. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'll bet the goal was 1/2 of the previous year
They must have an open ended budget, "a large increase in financial incentives and a near doubling of the number of recruiters, to 5,100 from 2,700" There is no end to the money when it comes to this kind of bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. BULLSHIT...Printing bullshit for the administration b4 the SOTU is
bad form NYT...

Well maybe it is right since there aren't enough jobs. :shrug: BushCo made sure that jobs weren't available.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. You could say they're "turning a corner..." nt
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. I don't believe one word of this report because.........
first off recruitment is done state by state. The story never mentions this or as to which branch. This is just a propaganda release of vague facts or assertions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC