Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WSJ: FAA Might Tap Private Money To Fund Upgrades

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 05:20 PM
Original message
WSJ: FAA Might Tap Private Money To Fund Upgrades
FAA Might Tap Private Money To Fund Upgrades

New Fees Levied to Cover
Agency's Bonds Could Shift
Burden to Business Jets
By LAURA MECKLER
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
February 4, 2006; Page A1

WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration is considering a plan to free the Federal Aviation Administration from the uncertainty of annual congressional appropriations and allow the agency to levy fees that would force business jets to pick up more of the tab for upgrading the nation's air-traffic-control system.

A proposal under discussion would allow the FAA to issue bonds that it would pay back by charging user fees, according to people familiar with the discussions. Details of the proposal, which would need congressional approval, remain in flux, and the White House hasn't signed off on it. Administration officials, hoping to unveil their plan this spring, have been consulting Wall Street investment banks for advice.

The objective is to find a way to pay for costly capital improvements to the nation's overtaxed air-traffic-control system and to create a more reliable revenue stream for the FAA. Agency officials have long complained that the unpredictable annual congressional appropriation process makes planning difficult -- especially for a multibillion-dollar upgrade like the one being contemplated. Levying fees, rather than taxes, on air-traffic-control users would almost certainly mean a shift in some of the cost of maintaining the air-traffic-control system from commercial airlines to business jets and, perhaps, recreational pilots. In 2004, business jets accounted for 18% of takeoffs and landings but paid only about 5% of the total $9.6 billion collected in various aviation taxes.

Lobbies for business aviators and recreational pilots already are gearing up to fight the proposal. Labor unions involved in the industry also are likely to oppose any move that would, in effect, privatize funding for the system. But beleaguered commercial airlines are enthusiastic. Officials are taking a close look at agencies such as the Tennessee Valley Authority, a federal corporation with $26 billion in private debt. It's also examining Bonneville Power, an electric utility within the Department of Energy that owes $13.6 billion, including $7.1 billion borrowed from the Treasury and $6.5 billion borrowed from capital markets. Neither the TVA nor the private Bonneville debt is guaranteed by the Treasury.

(snip)

URL for this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB113902637760365167.html (subscription)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. The AOPA would lobby against it...
...and they have come clout in Washington. I really don't see anything other than nominal user fees being assessed to general aviation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is pathetic!
Why don't they issue bonds to fund the war and have the oil companies and defense contractors pay the fees to make the payments to the creditors?

Better yet, why don't corporations and the wealthy return to the good old fashioned practice of paying taxes like they had to do during WWII and Korea?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC