Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. judge dismisses lawsuit seeking '04 election recount in Ohio

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 08:43 AM
Original message
U.S. judge dismisses lawsuit seeking '04 election recount in Ohio
Edited on Wed Feb-08-06 08:45 AM by Algorem
http://www.toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060208/NEWS02/602080464/-1/NEWS

Article published Wednesday, February 8, 2006

ELECTION 2004
U.S. judge dismisses case over recount
Prohibition against suing states cited

BLADE COLUMBUS BUREAU

COLUMBUS - More than a year after Ohio officially handed its 20 electoral votes and the national election to President Bush, a federal judge yesterday dismissed a lawsuit from candidates still waiting for their recount.

While U.S. District Court Judge James G. Carr in Toledo said Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell's actions "arguably" conflicted with federal law, the judge dismissed the suit on the grounds that the U.S. Constitution, with rare exception, prohibits suits against states in federal court.

The judge found that, since Mr. Blackwell's directive limiting the recount timeline affected just one election more than a year old, the suit didn't meet one of the exceptions to the immunity rule.

A federally authorized state law requires that any recount for which the required fee has been posted must begin between 11 and 15 days after the voting...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. When will the truth ever come out?
"While U.S. District Court Judge James G. Carr in Toledo said Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell's actions "arguably"
conflicted with federal law, ..............."

No need to worry about the law your honor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Is this judge trying to say, you need to bring different charges
against Blackheart? Like, breach of oath of office or something? The ruling sucks, but we tied him up in court AND maybe we can learn from the judge's ruling.

Maybe DU lawyers can help with this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Big surprise - The GOP locked in their judges years ago.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Damn. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
f-bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. What a surprise
can't have the truth, now can we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Did Kerry / Edwards fight for the recount, or was it third parties?
Libertarians and Greens? I would like to know...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Third parties
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. thanks for the info...
peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Sad as it is to convey
...that the Dems didn't fight that debacle, you're welcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I am a solid (progressive, liberal) Dem, but I do
appreciate the Greens calling out the gop on this fraud.

peace,
mdmc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Charlie Brown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. and good for the Libertarians
I don't agree with them on much, but they can be surprisingly principled when it comes to calling out corruption and fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. nice handle, Chuck!
I'm kinda down with compassionate libertarians, although I am the exact opposite of a libertarian - I am a true, big government liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. FWIW, a Clinton appointee
(first half 1994--wasn't it a dem majority Senate still then?) and in May 2002 went on the FISA court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. It was still a Dem majority. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
15. The fix is in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC