Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP/AP: United Arab Emirates Firm May Oversee 6 U.S. Ports

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
PhilipShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 12:17 AM
Original message
WP/AP: United Arab Emirates Firm May Oversee 6 U.S. Ports
Washington Post/AP
United Arab Emirates Firm May Oversee 6 U.S. Ports
February 12, 2006

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/11/AR2006021101112.html

A company in the United Arab Emirates is poised to take over significant operations at six American ports as part of a corporate sale, leaving a country with ties to the Sept. 11, 2001, hijackers with influence over a maritime industry considered vulnerable to terrorism.

The Bush administration considers the UAE an important ally in the fight against terrorism since the suicide hijackings and is not objecting to Dubai Ports World's purchase of London-based Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co.

The $6.8 billion sale could be approved Monday and would affect commercial port operations in New York, New Jersey, Baltimore, New Orleans, Miami and Philadelphia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. W, the king of the world corporatists
and the enemy of the U.S. working class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Isn't this an open invitation for terrorists to attack our ports...
that are so vulnerable!!! This is the worst decision I have seen for our security!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Give me a break! you should love the UAE... they hate terrorism
and it happens to be one of the most Capitalistic states on the planet... The UAE is ALL about making money...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
36. Oh well, if they're all about making money they must be good!
Are you crazy?? This is an issue of critical national security and we are selling it to the highest bidder?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Higans Donating Member (819 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #36
69. Of-coarse * is selling our security to the highest bidder.
Did you expect any thing else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
long_green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
39. Wonderful. So some incredibly well-financed terrorists
offer someone in the company a pile of money to look the other way. Why not? After all, they're ALL about making money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niallmac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
42. True but I find it all hilarious never the less.
This time in history will have to go down as more screwed up than the Dark Ages. We sequester Cat Stevens. We usher the Saudis out of the country immediately after 911. We read our own citizens mail and library requests without a warrant and we hire an Arab country to guard against Arab terrorists.
Your knowledge of the nuances of different Arab nation states, tribes whatever is appreciated. I only have to remind myself that you
are atypical of the average American who receives 90 percent of his information from CNN in which case A rabs is A rabs.
For my two cents all I can say is that this Homeland Security business is the most corrupt evil amoral piece of BS this nation has
created in a long time.

:donut:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
65. Wow, I guess if they're so Capitalistic
and all about making money than they must be good.:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
66. Well it was all about making money when we trained the 911 high-
jackers. We let them in because they had money. I guess you believe in selling your soul to the highest "devil".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
long_green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
38. seriously. who do you blame if an attack is made
on our ports OR an attack is made elsewhere by terrorists entering the country through a "friendly" port? Democrats? Homosexuals? The congregation at Coretta Scott King's funeral?
What an issue if there were an opposition party in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daphne08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. In addition to the obvious, why not hire an American company?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. ourports are going to be under foreign control! got that. looky here.

Stephen E. Flynn, who studies maritime security at the New York-based Council on Foreign Relations, said even under foreign control, U.S. ports will continue to be run by unionized American employees. "You're not going to have a bunch of UAE citizens working the docks," Flynn said. "They're longshoremen, vested in high-paying jobs."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. It's just a friendly takeover, not a terrorist plot!!!
Remember Capitalism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. JCMach1....I assume you are just being "tongue in cheek" on this?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
long_green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
40. I understand that
and I don't necessarily have a problem with foreign business investing in this country. But in the climate created by the Terra Administration this sticks out like a sore thumb.
The American longshoreman may still be there but who will hire the security? Not an American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adriennui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. why?
this is utterly surreal, i can now honestly say i do not understand anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldenOldie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. While the BFEE has all eyes on the illegal immigrants.....
they are selling our Ports of Entry off to our enemies who truly did participate in 9/11???

Where in the hell are those we elected to represent us????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. Hey, why don't we just sell them to Yemen while we're at it!!!
Or better yet, let just sell our Ports to the Bin Laden Family!!! :wtf: :crazy: :argh: :banghead: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. You gotta be kidding.
Holy fucking shit.

Any amount of American blood for money. eh bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. This is not good folks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
11. P & O are also the largest English Channel ferry operators
but I don't think anyone here is considering this a security risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
13. Jesus on a pancake
This ought to fly well with the minuteman-border-types in the gop. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
14. Well, heck, let's just start selling off our airports next.
Fire sale! Get a piece of the U.S. cheap! Let's put the Wal-Mart smiley somewhere on the flag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #14
26. well that was put forward this week by the DOT!! to sell Us airlines
to EU countries!!


don't look now....look over there...no over there...


who remembers the selling of America by Reagan..where even our capitol buildings were being sold to the Japanese...

its a good Gop..trick...the selling of America...fuck security..they don't care..because their Kool Aide drinkers are too damn stupid to know what the hell is really going on...

you know , their churches will tell them * is making them safe..and god knows they never read anything but the bible to find out whats really going on!


a fed up fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
15. This is not right on so many levels. The bastards are selling our
country right out from under us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Agree....this would have been unheard of before Bush.. Foreigners
controling our Ports. Can you imagine if Carter or Clinton had allowed this.

Shows that these Repupublicans have never had any "true beliefs" about America First and all that Crap they spout. They are liars and are selling our country off piece by piece under our noses while the Christian Fundies and the NeoCons dance in the parade.

Sell it off.! And, how long does anyone think it will be before those "unionized dock workers" get the ax and non-union workers are hired..

I hope the unions lead a charge against this. Without their noise this will go under the radar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. Foreigners already 'control your ports'
If that's how you characterise this (this isn't about controlling the whole port, just having significant operations there). P & O is a British company. Clinton did allow it:

# USA Acquired ITO – multiport stevedore/terminal operator, June 1999.
...
# New Orleans, USA Acquired Gulf Services, also in May 2000.
...
# New York, USA November 2000, entered into joint venture (PNCT) with P&O Nedlloyd in Port of New York and New Jersey with terminal capacity of 1M TEUs.
...
# Baltimore, USA Awarded 6 year contract to manage two facilities in May 2001.

http://portal.pohub.com/portal/page?_pageid=36,1,36_31151:36_32105&_dad=pogprtl&_schema=POGPRTL


There was a contest for buying the British parent company between Dubai Ports World and PSA, the state-owned Singapore port operator; Dubai bid the most.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #21
28. It shouldn't be allowed .........PERIOD....no matter who did it......and
in this case the UAI's makes it even more imperative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #16
27. not unheard of ..Reagan sold off our government buildings to
the Japanese...

then collected 3 $$ million the days after he left office to go to lunch with them in japan...

this is typical Rethuglican!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
51. Could you imagine the outrage if Clinton did something like this.
The only logical conclusion to draw, these Christian Fundies are trying to destroy the Government from the inside out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
17. Port security is the biggest hole in DHS...
As far as I've heard, port security is still being under-addressed by DHS. My HUGE fear is that someone will sail a nuke-laden container ship into one of our ports and set it off.:nuke:

Privatization of our security will KILL us, literally!:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. The terrorists in DC are a much bigger threat to America!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
19. "DP World" said it won approval from "Secretive US Govt. Panel!"
"DP World said it won approval from a secretive U.S. government panel that considers security risks of foreign companies buying or investing in American industry. The U.S. Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States "thoroughly reviewed the potential transaction and concluded they had no objection," the company said in a statement."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #19
55. Sibel Edmonds was JUST commenting the damage SECRECY inside
the Bush Administration is having on National Security.

From Sibel Edmonds' article:

Let's try your security angle on the subject of classification, where you state "disclosure of classified intelligence inhibits our ability to carry out our mission and protect the nation." The entire 9/11 Commission report includes only one finding that the attacks might have been prevented (Page 247 & 376). They quote the interrogation of the hijackers' paymaster, Ramzi Binalshibh, who commented that if the organizers, particularly Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, had known that the so-called 20th hijacker, Zacarias Moussaoui, had been arrested at his Minnesota flight school on immigration charges, then Bin Laden and KSM would have called off the 9/11 attacks, because news of that arrest would have alerted the FBI agent in Phoenix who warned of Islamic militants in flight schools in a July 2001 memo; a memo that vanished into the FBI's vaults in Washington. The Commission's wording is important here: only "publicity" could have derailed the attacks. Classification is indeed a very important mechanism, if it is applied diligently and wisely; however, as illustrated above, in certain circumstances, even with respect to national security information, classification can run counter to our national interests.


So, in this selling of the ports case, the secret business deal is something that other parts of government (FBI, NSA, CIA) weren't allowed to be a part of. There is no "publicity" about it until after the fact. WTF!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
20. It's like Michael Jackson owning
the rights to a ton of Beatles songs, only a billion times worse. What happens when they want to buy Lake Huron, or perhaps, Arizona?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
22. Nothing like having an inside track for the job here, eh?
DP World executive nominated for presitigous US government position

Global ports operator DP World today welcomed news that one of its senior executives, Dave Sanborn, has been nominated by US President George W. Bush to serve as Maritime Administrator, a key transportation appointment reporting directly to Norman Mineta, the Secretary of Transportation and Cabinet Member.

The White House has issued a statement from Washington DC announcing the nomination. The confirmation process will begin in February.

Mr Sanborn currently holds the position of Director of Operations for Europe and Latin America for the Dubai-based company
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
23. This is a joke. Who can't see this as selling our country off and
leaving it vulnerable to foreign attack? Christ. Our country is so stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. It's not your country being sold off
A British company is being bought by a company owned by the Dubai government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. It's GLOBILIZATION! Some here are okay with that. I and others are Not.
And, as I said up thread. How long before those Union jobs are gone....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. Thanks for the correction.
Dubai, Dubai. There is something about Dubai that rings a bell. Did that name come up in that French book, The Forbidden Truth? The one that talked about the secret meetings that led to 9/11?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PhilipShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. The Guardian: CIA agent...met Bin Laden in July in Dubai hospital
The Guardian
CIA agent alleged to have met Bin Laden in July
Anthony Sampson
Thursday November 1, 2001

http://www.guardian.co.uk/waronterror/story/0,1361,584444,00.html

Two months before September 11 Osama bin Laden flew to Dubai for 10 days for treatment at the American hospital, where he was visited by the local CIA agent, according to the French newspaper Le Figaro.

Bin Laden is reported to have arrived in Dubai on July 4 from Quetta in Pakistan with his own personal doctor, nurse and four bodyguards, to be treated in the urology department. While there he was visited by several members of his family and Saudi personalities, and the CIA.

Intelligence sources say that another CIA agent was also present; and that Bin Laden was also visited by Prince Turki al Faisal, then head of Saudi intelligence, who had long had links with the Taliban, and Bin Laden...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Well, well. How very interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PhilipShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. Yahoo News: U.S. Policy Towards Taliban Influenced by Oil
Yahoo News Thursday November 2001
U.S. Policy Towards Taliban Influenced by Oil - Say Authors
By Julio Godoy, Inter Press Service

http://tiger.berkeley.edu/sohrab/politics/taliban+us.html

PARIS, Nov 15 (IPS) - Under the influence of U.S. oil companies, the government of George W. Bush initially blocked U.S. secret service investigations on terrorism, while it bargained with the Taliban the delivery of Osama bin Laden in exchange for political recognition and economic aid, two French intelligence analysts claim.

In the book ''Bin Laden, la verite interdite'' (''Bin Laden, the forbidden truth''), that appeared in Paris on Wednesday, the authors, Jean-Charles Brisard and Guillaume Dasquie, reveal that the Federal Bureau of Investigation's deputy director John O'Neill resigned in July in protest over the obstruction.

Brisard claim O'Neill told them that ''the main obstacles to investigate Islamic terrorism were U.S. oil corporate interests and the role played by Saudi Arabia in it''.

According to the book, the government of Bush began to negotiate with the Taliban immediately after coming into power in February. U.S. and Taliban diplomatic representatives met several times in Washington, Berlin and Islamabad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #30
68. On Page 91 of "The Forbidden Truth"....

Another bank believed to have facilitated transfers for Osama bin Ladin's networks was the Dubai Islamic Bank<30>, created in 1975, based in the United Arab Emirates, and run by none other than the current minister of finance of the United Arab Emirates<31>. According to the CIA, these transfers fed organizations associated with bin Ladin. The Dubai Islamic Bank was also one of the principal shareholders in the BCCI with more than $80 million in assets there. The bank has been involved in several scandals...

<30> Bankers Almanack, 2000; IAC Company Intelligence, 2001.
<31> Among its shareholders are the governments of Dubai and Kuwait (which account for 10 percent of the capital). The bank is a shareholder in Bahrain Islamic Bank, Islamic Bank Bangladesh Ltd., and Tadamon, and also has investments in Al Shamal Islamic Bank.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #25
31. Dubai...running US ports.....as opposed to a British Company...Dubai
...Saudi...influence.... Open to infiltration...Not having our interests first..Globilization...is first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #25
37. Yes it is. Control of the biggest ports are being sold to a Middle Eastern
country. These ports are American and should be controlled by Americans. Instead foreigners are buying and selling control, which amounts the posession, of THE PORTS IN OUR COUNTRY.

Do not try to minimize this. This is absoluted obscene and ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
34. this will make the bushmilhousegang's drug smuggling easier


they are in the drug business you know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
41. Why is this story on page A17 ?????? Send this to AAR/Media/Dems ASAP
These thieves are selling our country out from under us.

We are in serious, serious trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
43. A Saudi owned firm was given access to FAA computers before
...911. No security risk there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
44. "A secretive US government panel" gave approval to the UAE!
snip

DP World said it won approval from a secretive U.S. government panel that considers security risks of foreign companies buying or investing in American industry. The U.S. Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States "thoroughly reviewed the potential transaction and concluded they had no objection," the company said in a statement.

The committee, which could have recommended that President Bush block the purchase, includes representatives from the departments of Treasury, Defense, Justice, Commerce, State and Homeland Security.



SNIP


IT'S THIS WIDESPREAD SECRECY BY THE * ADMINISTRATION THAT IS DESTROYING OUR COUNTRY!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerRepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
45. Secret Bush plan to break the dockworker's unions and do the next 9/11?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
46. Long discussion of this posted on DU this a.m.....check it out here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. Hi Koko01- about your link
I wanted to visit the other discussion you posted,
but your link just opens this thread.
Is there another thread you meant to post instead?
Thanks-
BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #46
52. Here's the DU Link for this again...don't know what happened to other one:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. Thanks Sweetie-pie! Found the other one, here it is:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. GACK! "Sweetie Pie?" ....last person who called me that...got
a very nasty demise...:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #57
58. Meant as a term of fondness only.
So sorry to have offended you.
sincerely,
BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
47. My head is now exploding...
This is beyond outrageous mockery of
the citizens of this country.
And you know what?
There will not
be so much as a soft
bleating from the sheep about it.
BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
agincourt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
49. Well I suppose the UAE would have inside scoop,
on where the terrorists are. Honestly, can you imagine a democratic president doing this? Every pigboy talking head would be exploding about the treason committed here. I'm sure timmy russert will make a stink. Yeah right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
50. first the japanese
then these arabs. My god we are selling america. /sarc

They own caribou coffee too.

UAE is one of the more stable countries in the ME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
54. Unless this company or some individuals have committed some terrorist acts
that someone is prepared to link to, I have to say I find the bigoted, disgusting, racist responses on this thread un-fucking-believable for a Progressive board.

Let me see if I have this straight.

1. There is a company that has been hired to do something that "would affect commercial port operations." Fascinating -- the article somehow fails to tell us what the fuck this company is exactly supposedd to do.

2. The company is from a country, the UAE. Presumably, the company is organized under the laws of the UAE or has personnel from there (another unspecified, rather loose association here).

3. That country, the UAE has "ties to the September 11, 2001 hijackers." Once again, the word "ties" could mean that the hijackers had coffee there, were born there, or spoke nicely of the place.

4. Because of this, people think (and apparently Charles Schumer is implying) that this company is going to cause terrorist attacks at U.S. ports?

Unfuckingbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. I agree that some responses have been racist in this or similar threads
Here's what's happening: currently, "P & O", a British company, run operations at 6 US ports (out of 29 around the world), for instance half of the Port Newark container terminal, which handles about 40% of the Port of New York/New Jersey container traffic. They run (and perhaps own the land of) docks, and shipping companies pay them for for the loading/unloading etc.

P & O is being bought by Dubai Ports World, a company owned by the Dubai government, which runs (and owns?) similar terminals in various countries. Dubai is one of the United Arab Emirates.

I don't know what the 'ties' are really meant to be either. The UAE is regarded as a trustworthy country by western governments (all governments, as far as I can see).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnydrama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #54
59. UAE
The company isn't from the UAE, it's owned by the government of the UAE. Big difference.

It's not hard to look up what people mean by ties to 9/11 hijackers. Look it up.

Do you think it's ok that GOVERNMENT's of other countries are running our ports?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #59
60. If you make the allegations, back them up.
What are the "ties" to which you are referring?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PhilipShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #60
61. Mad Cow News: Bush's UAE Ally in War on Terror Vacationed with Bin Laden
Edited on Tue Feb-14-06 11:29 AM by PhilipShore
Mad Cow Morning News
November 25, 2004

http://www.madcowprod.com/11122004issue.html

Mohammed bin Zayid, the UAE's Crown Prince and Chief of Staff, is tied to al-Qaeda yet regularly meets with Bush Administration Officials to discuss the prevention of terrorism.

"On February 10th, Clarke reported that a top UAE official had vehemently denied that high-level UAE officials were in Afghanistan."

"Evidence subsequently confirmed that high-level UAE officials had been there."

link


BBC News
Ports and ferries group P&O has agreed to be bought by Dubai Ports World in a takeover deal worth £3.3bn ($5.7bn).
29 November 2005

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4480542.stm

DP World, owned by the Dubai government, said it planned to keep P&O's headquarters in London and chief executive Robert Woods would continue to head the business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #54
70. There is nothing racist about this
Bushit keeps tell us we are at war. WHY was this decided, AGAIN, in secret if he had nothing to hide?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
62. MORE OUTSOURCING...BUT THIS TIME THEY WORK IN-HOUSE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
63. What the Hell?
Anything just to kiss ass for oil......

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
64. There are no more bad names left to call these idiots.....
:spank: :spank: :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
67. isn't this the straw that will break america's back?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC