Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hoekstra: Leak Means NSA Program No Longer Effective

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 04:09 PM
Original message
Hoekstra: Leak Means NSA Program No Longer Effective

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,184615,00.html

Hoekstra: Leak Means NSA Program No Longer Effective

WASHINGTON — The House Intelligence Committee chairman on Sunday questioned the value of President Bush's NSA eavesdropping program, saying Al Qaeda undoubtedly has changed its means of communication to avoid Washington's monitoring.

Bush said two weeks ago in his State of the Union address that the program of monitoring calls and e-mail between the United States and suspected terrorist associates overseas "remains essential to the security of America." But Rep. Pete Hoekstra, R-Mich., suggested that the public disclosure of the program's existence in December in the New York Times has undermined its effectiveness.

"Does anyone really believe that, after 50 days of having this program on the front page of our newspapers, across talk shows across America, that Al Qaeda has not changed the way that it communicates?" Hoekstra said on NBC's "Meet the Press."

Since that disclosure, legal scholars and lawmakers from both parties have questioned whether Bush had the authority to conduct the surveillance without a judge's approval.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Then they should stop!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. VIDEO of him on MTP saying that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Does anyone believe that, after 50 days of having this program,
on the front pages of the papers, that just about everyone has changed the way in which they communicate? Especially politicians?

Right. Only Al Qaeda is effected. Geeezzz...can we get some politicians with brains please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah - they are using US mail and carrier pigeons now. What a bunch
of hogwash. How exactly, are they supposed to communicate? Passing notes across the globe?

Ooooo,, look at me ,,, I am scared, oooo. :scared:

Honestly, I am much more concerned about my government breaking the law than I am about criminals breaking the law. If they can force our government to become criminals then they truly have won a victory and our leaders have given it to them. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. It wasn't effective before it was in the news. And while the American
was sleepily unaware of what the gov't was up to, AQ long ago no doubt assumed electronic communications were not secure and responded accordingly.

Hoekstra's just perpetuating the Bush myth regarding the necessity and effectiveness of what he was up to. And they still don't explain why the Bush Administration authorized this surveillance when he first came into office, prior to 9-11. Bush wasn't interested in Bin Laden and AQ then; he and Cheney dismissed the Clinton Administration's conern with AQ and terrorism as a paranoid obsession. They weren't paying attention to the FBI's and CIA's concerns regarding AQ and terrorism. So why and on whom was Bush authorizing this surveillance prior to 9-11?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmakaze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Another point in regards to when the wiretapping started...
As you say it was first authorised before Sept 11 - so, if it was so effective, and thus worth breaching the Constitution over, how come Sept 11 happened?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. who gives a flying hootie-hoo if it's effective? IT'S ILLEGAL, IMMORAL,
AND UNAMERICAN, YOU GOOF.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. recall that it was Bush himself who confirmed its existance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. "Does anyone really believe that, ..terrorists do not think we are monitor
ing them??--stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahah! THAT is funny
Unless they contracted the work out to the Mossad or the GRU the NSA is NEVER going to give up on attempts to collect data.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
11. and if Shrub was spying on "Al Qaeda " , further spying would be pointless
but since he's spying on Americans, he needs the "terrorists" excuse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprobate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
12. Mistake #1. Al Quaida was invented by Justice Dept, FBI---Link:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
13. Aha! The way out.
They will announce that the program has been discontinued because it is ineffective, not because it is illegal or unconstitutional. Program may be quietly resumed after all the hubbub has died down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
14. Yeah right.
The guys who beat Mr. Hoekstra's multi-trillion dollar gov't with a few box cutters would never imagine that their electronic communications might be bugged. Nah...

Incidentally, if OBL hadn't imagined the likelihood of eavesdropping then why didn't NSA simply listen in on his communications in Afghanistan and send a posse out to grab him? That was long before the big leak. Eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC