Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Eyes Atomic Illness Cost Cap

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 02:12 AM
Original message
White House Eyes Atomic Illness Cost Cap
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration is taking steps to limit costs associated with a benefits program for Cold War-era nuclear workers who developed cancer from radiation exposure, according to a White House document.

Republicans and Democrats say they are concerned, with one GOP lawmaker saying he plans to hold hearings.

The document, obtained by The Associated Press, was written by White House budget officials and sent to the Labor Department.

It commends Labor officials for "identifying the potential for a large expansion" of a program aimed at compensating thousands of nuclear workers. Then, it states that the White House will lead an interagency working group to develop ways "to contain growth in the costs of benefits" the program provides.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/bush_nuclear_workers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. All the nuclear proponents need to realize the real costs of this "safe"
Energy. Mining, storage and handling have enormous cost of human suffering and general health.

Please look into the Navajo nation in just one example. If this was not a problem do you think they would want to lessen the liabilities and obligations for the workers or their families?
Recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PhilipShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. AP: Bush team moves to limit nuke-illness costs
The Associated Press
Bush team moves to limit nuke-illness costs
02.15.2006

http://www.azstarnet.com/news/115956

WASHINGTON — The Bush administration is taking steps to limit costs associated with a benefits program for Cold War-era nuclear workers who developed cancer from radiation exposure, according to a White House document.

Republicans and Democrats say they are concerned, with one GOP lawmaker saying he plans to hold hearings.

Sen. Christopher "Kit" Bond, R-Mo., decried attempts to alter the program, saying, "Any effort by Department of Labor bureaucrats to limit these benefits would be a true injustice to these workers, their families and their memory."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 04:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. watch them sneak in a way to limit damages due to DU exposure too.
it's obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Good thinking. I bet they will too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. K & R (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. This kills the "cheap nuclear energy" argument
so think twice about reactivating the nuclear reactor building program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. This was weapons industry, not nuclear energy industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Mining covers both civilian and military
Edited on Wed Feb-15-06 06:00 PM by formercia
there is a proposal to use weapons grade plutonium and uranium as a feedstock for fuel for commercial reactors. Last year a shipment of weapons-grade plutonium was shipped to France to be converted into reactor fuel, thus the health cost of producing the fuel should be attributed to the civilian reactor program as well.
If energy companies want to use the material for reactor fuel, then they should shoulder the health cost of producing it as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. The Radiation Exposure Compensation Act covers
uranium miners and workers at uranium enrichment plants as well - the same mines that produce uranium for reactor fuel, and plants that enriched uranium for reactor fuel...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. There will be a Few DINOS
Who will support the NEOCONS on this.

Just "WAIT AND SEE"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. Cost will be capped at one quarter.
The White House would like victims to use it to call someone who cares.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Two quarters, in my neck of the woods. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. You just doubled the budget! You..you...LIBERAL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Liberal or Neocon? LOL nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
11. typical . . .main concern re NUCLEAR contamination:
cost control

The old "cost of doing business" dodge...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
12. "to contain growth in the costs of benefits"
These motherfuckers and their 1984 wordplay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
14. Compassionate conservatives - going out of their way to stop
Edited on Wed Feb-15-06 10:04 AM by superconnected
helping people, yet again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phusion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
15. I read _Bravo for the Marshallese_
and she has a chapter on case studies of nuclear workers around the country that were exposed to radiation and who have suffered debilitating health problems ever since. It was really an eye-opening discussion -- I had never heard of half of these Cold War programs that blatantly disregarded human health and safety.

Also, the deception employed by the military before and after the nuclear tests in the Marshall Islands was absolutely horrendous. It is truly a forgotten part of US history.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0534613268/102-4504336-6429735?v=glance&n=283155
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
16. Gee - silly me, I thot it meant to PREVENT Atomic Illness
.
.
.

That's my Canuk naivety for ya . .

If I'd even thought for a nanosecond about all the Depleted Uranium the PNACers are spreading around

I woulda known better

(sigh)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
17. Good Way To Avoid Costs of Depleted Uranium and Gulf War Syndrome
I just can't crank my cynicism up high enough these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. I didn't see your post before I added mine. But I'm confident we're right
not just cynical.

Although I'm sure we're both very much that as well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
18. Stupid mystic Librils - radiation is GOOD for you!!!
Hormesis etc.

Greenpeace Twit radiation paranoids....

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
22. Bush says 300 bucks ought to cover the cost of Americans injured
Edited on Wed Feb-15-06 06:17 PM by VegasWolf
by the government's testing of atomic bombs for war.

:puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
23. My dad was an Atomic Vet
http://www.naav.com/

He died of pancreatic cancer in Nov. 2004. Would he have died of it anyway, without having been exposed to radiation. Maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
24. Our family benefited from the DOE/DOL EEOICP program...
Edited on Wed Feb-15-06 06:38 PM by stlsaxman
My fathers survivors got compensation. We are very, very grateful to President Clinton for launching this program by executive order. Though no amount of money can replace a parent who was taken away from 6 children and a loving mother by such a horrible, long lasting disease (berylliosus), it is comforting to know that the government of the country he loved and served acknowledges his efforts. And our father was one of the first to die from this exposure (d. 1959).... there are now thousands upon thousands of families traumatized by this horrendous affliction. Over a period of 10-15 years the bone marrow rots and the lungs crystallize.

... and now Bush wants to cut the program? What a truely heartless, soul-less being. :mad:

more info available at http://www.dol.gov/esa/regs/compliance/owcp/eeoicp/main.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
25. Bet these limits morph into GI DU injuries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. There ya go. That makes at least 3 of us already. Will congress even
know what that's about yet? probably not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Congress knows. They are paid not to care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
26. I think this has to do with DEPLETED URANIUM in prep for Gulf wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. In both Gulf Wars and in Kosovo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC