Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House Democrats Fail in Bid for NSA Spying Docs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 10:13 AM
Original message
House Democrats Fail in Bid for NSA Spying Docs

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1927768,00.asp

House Democrats Fail in Bid for NSA Spying Docs

In a partisan debate going to the heart of the balance of power in American government, House Democrats overseeing the judiciary sought vehemently, but ultimately unsuccessfully, for a resolution asking the U.S. attorney general to turn over documents relating to National Security Agency's warrantless electronic eavesdropping program.

Republicans favored giving the administration two weeks to answer a list of questions sent by the chairman of the House Committee on the Judiciary, Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wisc., seeking an explanation of the authority under which the surveillance was conducted.

...

"With all due respect, I don't think this committee has taken its oversight responsibilities seriously," said Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif. "It doesn't matter to al Qaeda whether we go to a (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) court or not. It does matter to all of us whether we uphold our own Constitution, whether we have checks and balances."

Several Democrats, including Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., took Sensenbrenner to task for sending questions to the administration rather than conducting an investigation into the NSA surveillance, arguing that written responses from the executive branch frequently are less than satisfying.




Sensenbrenner is such a sleaze-ball!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. What is with this partisanship? It boggles the mind that
these repugs think this is A-OK. What about their constituents?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. repuke constituents will hopefully send reps a message in 06-08
and throw the bums out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds like obstruction of justice...
Enough is enough!

The Torture Czar has got to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. surprise surprise n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. Repuke Franks using nuke bomb scare to keep Congress toting * line
snip: Cautioning that if terrorists achieve their goals, there will likely be a nuclear bomb detonated in the United States, and possibly in Washington, D.C., Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., said Sensenbrenner "has acted in good faith and with wisdom," in sending the letter.

Sensenbrenner said that if the response to the written questions is "irrelevant or non-responsive or evasive," he will ask the Administration to submit more complete answers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithras61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Interesting that the link is now broken...
"Active Server Pages error 'ASP 0126'

Include file not found

/article2/0,1895,1927768,00.asp, line 345

The include file '/component/util_generate_article_discussion_info/0,1460,a=171674,00.asp' was not found."

when I click on the link...

I was wondering if Franks knows how many terrorist investigations have been successful solely because of the NSA's wirteap programs (that is, the information was not available through other, more reliable sources as the FBI claimed)...

Last time I checked, the number was still at 0...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. What is this? the 10th Resolution of Inquiry to fail?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
7. They are probably spying on the Democrats (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. I called the repukes on the intelligence committee yesterday
Trent Lott didn't even answer the phone. Others took note of my position but I could tell there was an "attitude" in the tone of their voice.




Cher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. its a get lost you pest attitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JulieWisc Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. Sensenbrenner is a
FASCIST PIG I wish I was in his district so I could vote against him! He has to go. I'm ashamed he is from the same state as I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demgrrrll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. I thought I just read that some Judge has given the US 20 days to hand
over the information on the wiretaps and that the DOJ is looking over the ruling right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
13. "two weeks to answer a list of questions" let's have a peeky shall we?
1)Have you or have you ordered spying on Americans?

answer: maaaaaaaaaaybe

2) have you or have you ordered spying on political candidates?

answer: I'll get back to you on that one.

3) have you or have you ordered warrant-less searches on American phone calls?

answer: Warrants? Warrants? We don't have to show you any stinking warrants!!

4)Have you answered all the questions truthfully and to the best of your ability?

answer: Bwahahahahah, oh, ah hem, yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC