Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judget orders release of spying documents

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 12:47 PM
Original message
Judget orders release of spying documents

http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/news/breaking_news/13888613.htm

Judget orders release of spying documentsAssociated Press

WASHINGTON - A federal judge dealt a setback to the Bush administration on its warrantless surveillance, ordering the Justice Department on Thursday to release documents about the program within 20 days or to compile a list of what it is withholding.

U.S. District Judge Henry Kennedy said a private group will suffer irreparable harm if the documents it has been seeking since December are not processed promptly under the Freedom of Information Act.

The Justice Department failed to meet the time restraints under FOIA and failed to make a case that it was impractical to deal quickly with the request by the Electronic Privacy Information Center.

Justice Department spokesman Charles Miller said no determination has been made as to what the government's next step will be.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mithras61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good! (odd headline, though...) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadisonProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. I love the last sentence
"Justice Department spokesman Charles Miller said no determination has been made as to what the government's next step will be."

I bet complying isn't one of their priorities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. Yeah, if I broke the law and ignored court orders...
I'd be posting this from a prison somewhere, assuming it had internet access. And electricity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. So? Judges ordered release of Abu Ghraib photos too.
And the Administration decided to ignore the final ruling.

These folks pay no attention to laws or judgeswho rule against them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It was my understanding that those pictures and videotapes..
..were still being appealed by the gummint...???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Nope. No appeal, they just ignored the last ruling.
First, they missed the release deadline.

Then, they CLAIMED they intended to appeal it
at some undefined time in the future...
(even though the deadline to appeal was long past)

Now, in their response to the photos released in Australia,
they mentioned that they had 'decided against' releasing them.

Must be nice, huh? If I ever get sued, can I just 'decide against'
obeying the court's orders?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. I had not heard about that..they simply ignored the court ruling??
Edited on Thu Feb-16-06 03:35 PM by truebrit71
WTF???

How is that possible. They simply decided to ignore the ruling....last time I checked NO-ONE is above the law.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. this is worth watching n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Just keep screaming...RULE OF LAW!
RULE OF LAW! RULE OF LAW!

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. Once again, here's to the sanity of the courts.
It is a really, really good thing that Federal Judges are appointed for life. We may not like how 5 wingnuts on the Supreme Court rule but, by and large, the judiciary remains fair and independent.

Thank goodness! :toast:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Thank heavens for Clinton appointees.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. And thank goodness for all those civil liberties groups
They have been fairly successful in getting documents through the FOI act information from the govt. Who else do we know of that demand that documents that are kept from us, we the people, are brought into the light of day. Our Congress people are outnumbered obviously and scared to lose their jobs. Thanks Congress people. (sarcasm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. Picture and brief bio of the Judge.
Edited on Thu Feb-16-06 01:14 PM by Pacifist Patriot
http://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/kennedy-bio.html

Any bets the Republicans will scream, "It's Clinton's fault we have this activist judge."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Begs question why aren't DOJ and NSA Inspector General's doing anything?
Edited on Thu Feb-16-06 01:23 PM by EVDebs
Now look up bios of Glenn Fine (DOJ's Inspector General) and Thomas F. Gimble (the DOD/NSA IG). You can see somewhat why these guys are just sitting on their hands while Rome burns.

It's up to the courts and Fitzgerald now. The fate of the Republic for which it stands...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wind Dancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Political blackmail?
I honestly believe many of these people at the highest levels can't afford to have their "secrets" exposed. The so-called failures of 9/11 were never investigated and those involved were given the "Medal of Freedom" and/or promotions. It's a given that anybody appointed by this administration is part of a larger, sinister group.

Fitzgerald seems to be one of the few decent and honorable men working within his boundaries to prosecute the criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Do you get the feeling we are hanging by a thread?
Edited on Thu Feb-16-06 02:26 PM by lyonn
Edit: Wonder if he knew Alito from Princeton? He might have know Alito but, Alito probably didn't know Kennedy. Wrong color and party ya know. (being facetious)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. or I hope he doesn't travel in a small plane
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. U.S. must release domestic spying documents
WASHINGTON - A federal judge Thursday ordered the Justice Department to respond within 20 days to requests by a civil liberties group for documents about President Bush’s domestic eavesdropping program.

The ruling was a victory for the Electronic Privacy Information Center, which sued the department under the Freedom of Information Act in seeking the release of the documents.
U.S. District Judge Henry Kennedy ruled that the department must finish processing the group’s requests and produce or identify all records within 20 days.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/11389667/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Good, we should have those in 6 months or so...
...maybe JUST in time for the Fall 2006 Elections!:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I'm not holding my breath...
They are great at dragging their feet and throwing up "legal" roadblocks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edward Copeland Donating Member (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
21. Judge orders NSA documents released
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A federal judge Thursday ordered the Justice Department to respond within 20 days to requests by a civil liberties group for documents about President Bush’s domestic eavesdropping program.
The ruling was a victory for the Electronic Privacy Information Center, which sued the department under the Freedom of Information Act in seeking the release of the documents.
U.S. District Judge Henry Kennedy ruled that the department must finish processing the group’s requests and produce or identify all records within 20 days.
“Given the great public and media attention that the government’s warrantless surveillance program has garnered and the recent hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee, the public interest is particularly well served by the timely release of the requested documents,” he said.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11389667/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. No wonder the repubs quickly made a deal with the WH on the
investigation.


Keep up the pressure!

& Welcome to DU

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Surprizing no interest in this post.
Edited on Thu Feb-16-06 04:08 PM by hang a left
That said, I imagine will see those records right about the time the White House releases Cheney's energy meeting records.

Knr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. ...or the AbuGhraib photos and videos....
Edited on Thu Feb-16-06 04:18 PM by Triana
...another post and program that was ignored is the one about Dick Gordon's "The Story" on NPR today. It dealt with torture. It was very compelling. He interviewed a man who had been tortured much like the US is torturing detainees at AbuGhraib and Gitmo.

But the post sunk to the bottom of GD in less than a minute. Oh well. :shrug: (whining: I tried!)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. It's gonna be a boxed set!
NSA Records, Energy Meeting Records plus BONUS Abu Ghraib photos!

Coming in December 2009 - just in time for Xmas!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. That's an interesting development.
I would love to see what is released. Wish they could do the same thing to Cheney's energy commission.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happydreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. So, does failure to follow the judges order mean the Justice
Dept. is breaking he law? And if so, what difference does it make. During the 80's the Justice Dept. was fined for nearly 7 million by the Hamilton's in te INSLAW case but then AG Ed Meese just kept on truckin. The taxpayer paid the bill. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
27. Woohoo.
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demgrrrll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
29. This is a big deal I will bet Gonzales is feverishly looking for a way
out of this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trevelyan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
30. K&R This judge and his ruling need to be widely known.
Hope it will encourage others to keep the faith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wookie294 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
31. White House Ordered to Release Spy Papers
WASHINGTON - A federal judge ordered the Bush administration on Thursday to release documents about its warrantless surveillance program or spell out what it is withholding, a setback to efforts to keep the program under wraps.

At the same time, the Republican chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee said he had worked out an agreement with the White House to consider legislation and provide more information to Congress on the eavesdropping program. The panel's top Democrat, who has requested a full-scale investigation, immediately objected to what he called an abdication of the committee's responsibilities.

U.S. District Judge Henry Kennedy ruled that a private group, the Electronic Privacy Information Center, will suffer irreparable harm if the documents it has been seeking since December are not processed promptly under the Freedom of Information Act. He gave the Justice Department 20 days to respond to the group's request.

"President Bush has invited meaningful debate about the wireless surveillance program," Kennedy said. "That can only occur if DOJ processes its FOIA requests in a timely fashion and releases the information sought."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060217/ap_on_go_co/eavesdropping
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. The WH: " Ooooh... I'm scared!!!"
Laughing all the way to the bank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. Very good.
Yeah, I read it right before I saw it on DU. It's too bad the Intelligence committee is so manipulated by the admin, but Specter's doing some good with his hearings-even if they aren't sworn in.

-Specter's committee will continue to probe the program's legality at a Feb. 28 hearing. The Justice Department strongly discouraged him from calling former Attorney General John Ashcroft and his deputy, James Comey, to testify about the surveillance program.-

It's funny how scared the DOJ seems to be of the potential to have an honest guy come p there and say what's going on. The very people who objected to the Admin's actions in the first place(Ashcroft and Comey). I really hope they give them away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. Why do Republicans want a dictatorship?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. the Spy Papers, are right there beside
the Energy Papers.

think we'll ever seen 'em?
dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychopomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #31
36. It's about time
kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 03:45 AM
Response to Original message
37. so which excuse will they use to stonewall?
1. National Security?

2. Executive Privilege?

3. can't release them during an on-going investigation?

4. Computer Glitch ate the documents?

5. ummm...didn't have a press person with them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
38. Next step: appeal to the stacked Supreme Court. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC