Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pakistani, Danish diplomatic ties collapse over cartoons

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 10:23 AM
Original message
Pakistani, Danish diplomatic ties collapse over cartoons
Pakistan's ambassador to Denmark has been called back to Islamabad "for consultations" amid a continuing row over cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad, the foreign office said on Friday.

The move comes shortly after officials said that Denmark, where the drawings were first published in September, had temporarily closed its embassy in Islamabad.

"Pakistan's ambassador in Copenhagen, Mr Javed A Qureshi, has been called to Islamabad for consultations over the cartoon controversy," foreign ministry spokesperson Tasnim Aslam said.

Government sources said the decision was made during a meeting between top Pakistani foreign ministry officials and the Danish ambassador in Islamabad, Bent Wigotski, at the ministry on Friday.

Mail & Guardian
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. The neocons certainly are doing their part...
to bring about the collapse of civilization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Apparently at the beginning of the controversy
Muslims living in Denmark approached the Danish government about the matter, and nothing was done. I realize that many don't understand the controversy; I would again state that what is important is seeing what organizations and governments are gaining something by keeping this controversy alive.

Check out the latest op-ed piece in the NY Times about the controversy if you are interested:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/17/opinion/17Wright.html?_r=1&th&emc=th&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Daniel Pipes apparently had a hand...
in pushing not just the cartoons in the Danish paper but others that were taken from racist web sites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. The Pipe interview has now
become active involvement.

I haven't seen any evidence that he was behind the cartoons. He just gave an interview to the one of "a certain persuasion" that later solicited the cartoons in response to a children's book writer's complaints.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
megatherium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. What is the Danish government supposed to do?
Are the Danes prepared to have government censorship of their news media? The Danish government made it clear that they do not have the right to prevent such cartoons from being published, nor are they going to apologize for something they have no control over. Muslims do not have the right to call criticism of their religion hate speech, nor do they have the right to force non-Muslim Danes to follow their religious taboo against portrayals of their Prophet.

It may be that the publishers of the cartoons were trying to instigate trouble, or at least a national debate. (They claim they were trying to establish that a minority group could not stifle freedom of expression.) It is also true that some Islamists have been propogating the controversy for their own purposes, going so far as to circulate extremely repulsive cartoons along with the ones the Danes actually published. As a freedom of speech absolutist, I think it's a really bad idea to allow a majority or a minority to tell a newspaper to not publish offensive material. Freedom of speech doesn't mean a hell of a lot if only inoffensive speech is protected. We do not have blasphemy laws in the West (or at least ones that are enforced) -- for a reason.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemExpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 04:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. There was nothing to be done except to point the way to the courts
for grievances.

No state imposed respect of religious or ideological beliefs please or the slippery slope will be the result.

I believe that most European governments are very aware of this and reject any proposition to further curtail categories of offensive speech.



DemEx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. I have to say that is the most ridiculous headline I have ever read
Nothing more to be seen on this planet. One to beam up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KDLarsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Please!
Won't someone think of the ties?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. An appropriate song:
Edited on Fri Feb-17-06 12:29 PM by Jim Sagle
Batman

Batman!
Dada dada
Batman!
Dada dada
Batman!
Dada dada
Batman!
Dada dada
Batman!
Dada dada
Dada dada
Batman!
Dada dada
Dada dada
Batman!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thorandmjolnir Donating Member (390 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Regarding the approach in the beginning.
The people approaching the danish government wanted the government to take punitive action against the paper. The Danish Prime minister said that under the law and the Danish Constitution, he could do no such thing (which is true).

Later, that was used as a excuse, saying that the government refused to meet and hear the complaint.

Danish law does contain what is called the "Racism paragraph", in which it is a crime to intentionally and willfully make disparaging comments about a group of people. However, when it comes to the press and the context of the statements, there is great leeway.

Also the European Court of Human Rights have held that the Press has greater freedom than ordinary citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
11. Fuck Pakistan
and Saudi Arabia. Any country that will actully recall an ambassador over this is fucking stupid beyond belief. These two countries are conveniently at the heart of the Wahhabi terrorist movement and both are "allies" in Bush's "war on terror".



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC