swag
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-17-06 12:48 PM
Original message |
Merrill to Pay $164 Mln to Settle 23 Research Suits (Bloomberg) |
|
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=71000001&refer=home&sid=awudx0BA1GNUFeb. 17 (Bloomberg) -- Merrill Lynch & Co., the world's largest securities firm, will pay $164 million to settle 23 investor lawsuits, ending most litigation over whether it issued misleading research on Internet companies.
New York-based Merrill said in a filing today with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that two class action lawsuits remain active against the firm, one of which is before the U.S. Supreme Court.
``It was a long, hard, difficult negotiation,'' said Herbert Milstein, a partner in the Washington law firm Cohen Milstein Hausfeld & Toll, who represents shareholders. ``Merrill thought there was a risk, and we negotiated a settlement,'' he said, adding that the deal was reached late last night.
Merrill said in the SEC filing that the firm will record a $170 million litigation expense in its fourth-quarter 2005 financial results.
. . .
Merrill, through its star technology analyst Henry Blodget and other researchers, issued reports urging investors to buy shares of Internet companies such as 24/7 Real Media Inc. and Interliant Inc. Investors claimed the analysts didn't believe the companies were good risks. Investors later filed lawsuits against Merrill, claiming they were misled and seeking damages.
|
swag
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-17-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message |
1. They had to settle because the judge who decided it was okay |
|
for Blodget et al. to keep putting lipstick on the pigs in which the investment banking side of Merrill had extreme interest died before he could dismiss all the suits.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 05:49 AM
Response to Original message |