Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rockefeller Questions NSA's Authority (Sen. Roberts nixed his proposal)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 08:23 AM
Original message
Rockefeller Questions NSA's Authority (Sen. Roberts nixed his proposal)
Edited on Sat Feb-18-06 08:24 AM by Wordie
Senator Rockefeller submitted an investigative proposal Thursday, but Republicans, led by Intelligence Chairman Pat Roberts (R-KS), voted to adjourn without considering it. Roberts said that the proposal might be considered if efforts to work with the White House to resolve questions about the program and to create legislative solutions do not succeed.

Sen. Rockefeller's proposal asked that these questions be investigated: whether NSA engaged in spying activities after 9/11, before the President's secret spying program began; how intelligence collected as part of the NSA program is retained; operational procedures of the program; concerns raised by federal judges; and operational technology, among other questions.

Rockefeller Questions NSA's Authority

By KATHERINE SHRADER, Associated Press Writer Fri Feb 17, 9:37 PM ET

WASHINGTON - The top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee wants the panel to look into whether the National Security Agency was eavesdropping without proper authority in the weeks after the Sept. 11 attacks.

...Rockefeller wants the full committee to understand the NSA's activities — "including any warrantless surveillance" — that took place between the suicide hijackings in 2001 and the initiation of President Bush's controversial surveillance program.

Rockefeller also wants the panel to investigate how that may have supplemented intelligence collected and analyzed before the attacks. That line of inquiry is the first of 13 questions Rockefeller circulated to committee members as part of his motion to investigate.

More members of Congress are also expressing interest in weighing in on the program. Sen. John Warner (news, bio, voting record), R-Va., told reporters that he's had conversations with members of the "Gang of 14" — centrist senators who defused a showdown over judicial filibusters last year — about whether they should consider reviewing laws relating to the president's program. But, he said, they haven't reached a decision.

Associated Press writer Liz Sidoti contributed to this report.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/eavesdropping;_ylt=Aizv4_hqstTITLlngBtOQC3B4FkB;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. how about the most important question? is it actually being used to
only look for real terrorists or are they lying and using it for political and other purposes.

i think they are lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. He may be asking that question, too. The article didn't have a list of all
his questions (I believe it said there were 13).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. nominate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. simply put-Roberts/Repugs are allowing the WH to dictate how this
will be investigated-and even if will be.

......Roberts said that the proposal might be considered if efforts to work with the White House to resolve questions about the program and to create legislative solutions do not succeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I signed the PFAW petition...everyone should keep pressure on these guys!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IthinkThereforeIAM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Roberts is Stonewalling...


... kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I think he is covering for the Bush administration.
Edited on Sat Feb-18-06 03:22 PM by Wordie
More attention needs to be given to Rockefeller's proposal, imo. I'm going to email Tweety and KO with it.

If anyone else thinks of other tv hosts who should also be advised of this, so that they might cover it on their programs, please email them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. so the Dems just got shoved aside AGAIN.


......Senator Rockefeller submitted an investigative proposal Thursday, but Republicans, led by Intelligence Chairman Pat Roberts (R-KS), voted to adjourn without considering it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. nominated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. WH "their bar for agreeing to any legislative changes would be high."





....Roberts told the Times that he does not believe much support exists among lawmakers for exempting the program from the control of the FISA court. That is the approach Bush has favored and one that would be established under a bill proposed by Sen. Mike DeWine (news, bio, voting record), R-Ohio.

White House officials have said their bar for agreeing to any legislative changes would be high. They have signaled they are open only to legislation that would "further codify" in law the authority the president insists he already has without Congress' approval, something officials believe would be accomplished with DeWine's proposal.

Bush also has been cool to expansive debate about the program, saying Friday that the discussion going on now is "too bad, because guess who listens to the discussion? The enemy."

Roberts has defended Bush's program, which was revealed by the Times in a story in December. Bush says the program to monitor electronic communication between the United States and international sites involving suspected al-Qaida operatives is vital to anti-terrorism efforts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC