Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chertoff defends review of ports takeover by Arab company

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 11:00 AM
Original message
Chertoff defends review of ports takeover by Arab company

http://www.gainesville.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060219/APN/602190621

Chertoff defends review of ports takeover by Arab company

Homeland Security Director Michael Chertoff on Sunday defended the government's security review of an Arab company given permission to take over operations at six major U.S. ports.

"We make sure there are assurances in place, in general, sufficient to satisfy us that the deal is appropriate from a national security standpoint," Chertoff said on ABC's "This Week."

...

"It's unbelievably tone deaf politically at this point in our history," Sen. Lindsay Graham, R-S.C. said on "Fox News Sunday."

"Most Americans are scratching their heads, wondering why this company from this region now," Graham said.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Unless there are hidden trapdoors to this someplace, I am completely
stupefied that it slipped past KKKarl Rove's desk.

Wouldn't SOMEONE in that idiot White House have an inkling that this could be a grievous public relations disaster for the administration?

I accept that they are comprehensively evil. But I didn't think they were ALL this stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't think they care any more
Time is short. Only 3 more years to loot and steal America. Then it's off to the Canary Islands or Switzerland to live like kings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I'm left with few other choices, jimshoes. These people are dastardly,
and now they face a second rocky week in the media.

All last week it was the vice president, possibly the drunk vice president, gunning down some 78-year old GOP lawyer on the Armstrong Ranch.

This week the editorial pages wil be full of observations -- I'm guessing mostly very negative -- about the sell-out of U.S. port security to interests in the UAR.

If I were Michael Chertoff -- heaven forbid -- I would resign this afternoon and move to Bolivia. He's about to be buried alive under the Hurricane Katrina report and next the port security issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IthinkThereforeIAM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. Second rocky week in the media? you mean the third rocky week...

... eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
henslee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. It;s like one of those dept. store shopping sprees u see on TV. The gun
goes off and GO -- grab what you can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Same thing happened in FL
when the first batch of State Reps were term limited. They went nuts giving away the store.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. ...because theyve been getting away with worse for years. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timefortruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. Republicans complain, but they support their man
no matter what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. There will come a tipping point
where they don't any longer.

Funny, I thought this would be it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. With evey incredulous blunder and abuse I awaited the tipping point.
I gave up after the elections. It was so evident after the debates that Bush was /is so incredibly wrong for America and such a complete lying dolt, that I thought for sure the masses would see that the Emperor had no clothes.

Diebold and fanaticism rule of the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
9. I feel safer now
If Chertoff, who did a heck of job on NO, says its ok what is the issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. Chertoff says Dubai port deal includes safeguards
Chertoff says Dubai port deal includes safeguards
Sun Feb 19, 2006 11:32 AM ET

WASHINGTON, Feb 19 (Reuters) - The U.S. homeland security chief said on Sunday a deal for a Dubai-based company to manage major U.S. ports would include security safeguards, but a Republican senator urged a probe and called the Bush administration "tone deaf politically" for approving it.

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said the Bush administration had approved the sale of British firm P&O (PO.L: Quote, Profile, Research), which manages six U.S. ports including New York, to Dubai Ports World after a classified review and the deal would include safeguards to protect U.S. national security.

"You can be assured that before a deal is approved we put safeguards in place, assurances in place, that make everybody comfortable that we are where we need to be from a national security viewpoint," Chertoff said on ABC's "This Week with George Stephanopoulos."

But Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican, said it was a mistake for the administration to approve the sale and called on Congress to investigate it.

"It's unbelievably tone deaf politically at this point in our history, four years after 9/11, to entertain the idea of turning port security over to a company based in the UAE who avows to destroy Israel," Graham said on "Fox News Sunday."
(snip/...)

http://today.reuters.com/investing/financeArticle.aspx?type=bondsNews&storyID=2006-02-19T163257Z_01_N19219437_RTRIDST_0_SECURITY-PORTS.XML
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Safeguards... such as....
what ???

This whole bush admin is full of crap isn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Yeah, right, like Chertoff had plans in place for Katrina.
Like the repukes had plans in place for 9/11. Like they had plans in place for the poor and hungry. Like they had plans in place to get Iraq WMDs. Yeah right, tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. "Trust us -- we would never screw up" EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. He does project the " just trust us" attitude-yet all infor is classifed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. "I don't think anyone ever imagined that terrorists would
infiltrate a UAE company and then attack our ports." Condi Rice, December, 2006.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Good one!
Edited on Sun Feb-19-06 01:58 PM by Up2Late
I can almost hear it now!:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
15. Chertoff says Dubai port deal includes safeguards (Reuters)
Edited on Sun Feb-19-06 01:32 PM by Up2Late
(Well, since he's "doing such a Heck of a Job," that's enough for me...)

Chertoff says Dubai port deal includes safeguards


Sun Feb 19, 2006 12:29 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A deal for a state-owned Dubai company to manage major U.S. ports includes security safeguards, the U.S. homeland security chief said on Sunday, but a Republican senator urged a probe and called the Bush administration "tone deaf politically" for supporting it. Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said the Bush administration had approved the sale of British firm P&O, which manages six U.S. ports including New York, to Dubai Ports World after a classified review.

"You can be assured that before a deal is approved we put safeguards in place, assurances in place, that make everybody comfortable that we are where we need to be from a national security viewpoint," Chertoff said on ABC's "This Week with George Stephanopoulos." But Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican, said it was a mistake for the administration to approve the sale and called on Congress to investigate it.

"It's unbelievably tone deaf politically at this point in our history, four years after 9/11, to entertain the idea of turning port security over to a company based in the UAE who avows to destroy Israel," Graham said on "Fox News Sunday." "I don't think now is the time to outsource major port security to a foreign-based company," he said.

Sen. Barbara Boxer, a California Democrat, criticized the secrecy of the Bush administration's review and said she would support legislation to block foreign companies from buying port facilities. "I don't think now is the time to outsource major port security to a foreign-based company," he said.

(more at link below)

<http://go.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=politicsNews&storyID=11263976&src=rss/politicsNews>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yes, we know how 'safe' DHS made the gulf coast on Chertoff's
watch. Why believe anything this rat bastard says?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Yeah, the man reeks of credibility!
Heck of a job Mikey!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. so now the only things protecting our borders are safeguards?
gee, for a group of folks who claim to be strong on defense, that makes no sense whatsoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Maybe it gives US industries deni-ability when the inevitable
happens. They know there is no way to stop it without checking every inch of every ship coming to port, and the US is not willing to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Well after his handling of Katrina I feel completely relieved!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pfitz59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
23. Links......
http://www.dpa.co.ae/index.html

"The horse's mouth...."

No links to investors or ownership......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pfitz59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Links # 2......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
24. Chertoff: typical profits-over-patriotism, money-grubbing. . .
...oh, never mind...Nothing new here in the Repuke Party people.

:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sadie5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. What exactly are those safeguards?
Wanna bet they are classified?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. yes, I believe it was the NYT that said it was classified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
28. tell Dubai to give us Osama and then we'll talk business!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
29. Lord God Bush has decreed that it is best for the corporations !!
Lord Bush and the republicans exist solely to enrich multinational corporations. The selling of our sovereignty by the corporate cabal is no surprise to most of us here at DU. The freepers and other stupid Bush supporters will find a way to rationalize this terrible mistake and will fall in line with Lord Bush. They always do !!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
32. nominated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
33. Chertoff belongs in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
34. Hmmm, Chertoff "assures" Americans "that the deal is appropriate
from a national security standpoint" yet the NYT is reporting the following:

"The investigation did not include background checks on the senior managers of the company or an evaluation of how the company screens its own employees, Mr. King said. "Certainly, you would think they would talk to the Port Authority," he added."

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/17/nyregion/17ports.html


Okay, since the clearance "DID NOT INCLUDE background checks on senior management or an evaluation of how the company screens its own employees", how, exactly, can Mr. Chertoff reassure Americans that their review is so thorough that everyone should relax and let it happen? Oh.....wait......this is the same Chertoff that thought everything was going well regarding NO and Hurricane Katrina, makes perfect sense, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. You're doin' a heckuva job, Chertie !
I suppose it is inevitable that we will lose another city due to the corruption of the corporate cabal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
35. The Gov. is outsourcing our port security because they know we
can't protect them with the funds we have and they BELIEVE we will have an attack from our ports. The White House doesn't want the responsibility. When/if we are attacked bush et al can claim it ISN'T their fault...someone else was guarding the ports. We're not responsible so continue to vote for us...we can protect you. Wasn't our fault!

I'm sure that is their thinking. It's a CYA deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC