THE United States stunned UN officials and rights advocates today by threatening to reopen talks on a painfully negotiated resolution for a new UN Human Rights Council. General Assembly President Jan Eliasson released a draft compromise text on the council to replace the discredited Geneva-based Human Rights Commission, which has included some of the world's worst rights violators.
The proposal sets a higher threshold for abusing nations to get a seat on the body and calls for a majority vote of all 191 General Assembly members, not just those present. Currently, nations are elected regionally in the 54-member Economic and Social Council. The United States and other Western nations had wanted about 30 members rather than the 47 proposed in the text as well as a two-thirds vote to make it harder for rights abusers, such as Zimbabwe or Sudan, to gain a seat.
US Ambassador John Bolton said he preferred "real" negotiations between governments rather than consultations with Mr Eliasson or his mediators. That could result in a line-by-line negotiation of the text, which would open the door to other critics of the new rights council, a reform demanded by world leaders at a UN summit in September. The council aims to continue the practice of investigating abusers and helping nations on human rights bodies and laws.
"Based on conversations we've had with other governments, the strongest argument in favour of this draft is that it's not as bad as it could be," Mr Bolton told reporters. "So we will be studying it further." Secretary-General Kofi Annan, Mr Eliasson and human rights groups opposed Mr Bolton's suggestions. Mr Annan said countries had had enough time for discussions, so "now is the time for a decision". He said the council was not everything he proposed a year ago but was better placed "to address situations of gross and systematic violations of human rights".
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,18257439%255E1702,00.html