Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Afghanistan more dangerous than Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
ECH1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 06:09 PM
Original message
Afghanistan more dangerous than Iraq
Despite purported military success in Afghanistan, the U.S. Institute of Peace says the country in 2005 was more dangerous for American troops per capita than Iraq.

The group also said in a new report that NATO’s imminent takeover of operations in southern Afghanistan could derail counter-insurgency operations.

"Although NATO has approved more ’robust’ rules of engagement for its troops in its expanded mission, the organization still lacks the capacity and the will to aggressively root out insurgent forces," USIP stated. "Moreover, NATO foreign ministers have resisted any major role in counter-insurgency activities, insisting instead on a peacekeeping posture focused on ’stabilization and security’ assistance for the Afghan government."

According to USIP, in the spring of 2005 U.S. troop casualties -- both injured and killed -- reached 1.6 per 1,000 soldiers in Afghanistan, compared with a casualty rate of 0.9 per 1,000 in Iraq.

http://www.paktribune.com/news/index.php?id=135343
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe if Bush hadn't taken us on our Iraq DIVERSION
Afghanistan would be in much better shape today, and the warlords and Taliban wouldn't be regaining clout!:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. afgha-who? nevermind that. it's on to Iran.
:sarcasm: :nuke: :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. The US Institute of Peace sounds pretty militaristic.
Oh.

http://www.usip.org/


The United States Institute of Peace is an independent nonpartisan national institution established and funded by Congress. Our mission is to help prevent, manage, and resolve international conflicts by empowering others with knowledge, skills, and resources, as well as by our direct involvement in peacebuilding efforts around the world.


Hmmm, peacebuilding through military means, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ECH1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I don't see how Afghanistan is going to be fixed otherwise
Edited on Fri Feb-24-06 10:35 PM by ECH1969
If the US left tomorrow the Taliban would take about half of Afghanistan over the next year and from there you probably would would see a very very long war inside Afghanistan. The Taliban aren't going to lay down their arms so unless they take over again, which could happen, but would take a very long time even if we left tomorrow there is no non-military solution to the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. US more dangerous than all the ME combined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC