Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Al-Qaida says it hit Saudi oil facility/ Al Jazeera

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 01:37 AM
Original message
Al-Qaida says it hit Saudi oil facility/ Al Jazeera


Al-Qaida says it hit Saudi oil facility

Saturday 25 February 2006, 7:27 Makka Time, 4:27 GMT

Oil prices jumped $2 a barrel on news of the attack


Al-Qaida has claimed responsibility for the foiled attack on a Saudi Arabian oil facility at Abqaiq on Friday. In a statement posted on a Web site often used by Islamist groups, al-Qaida said two of its members carried out the attack.

It said the raid was within the framework of efforts by al-Qaida to prevent the theft of Muslims' wealth by "crusaders and Jews" and to force "infidels" out of the peninsula. The authenticity of the statement could not be verified.

In Abqaiq, a guard manning an outer gate of the facility said security forces were combing the plant in search of any of the attackers hiding there. "The security situation is still unstable," said the guard, ushering people away.

Two cars had exploded at the gates of the huge facility after security forces fired on suicide bombers trying to storm it. Saudi security adviser Nawaf Obaid said security forces fired on three cars at the outer gates, 1.5km from the main entrance. He said that one car, carrying armed men and packed with explosives, rammed the gates.


<snip>

Significant target

Robert Baer, the former Middle East CIA field officer, has described Abqaiq as "the most vulnerable point and most spectacular target in the Saudi oil system". Gary Ross, CEO at PIRA Energy consultancy in New York said: "It's not clear what damage there is but Abqaiq is the world's most important oil facility," "This just emphasises fears over global oil supply security when we're already facing major ongoing risks in Nigeria, Iran and Iraq."

<snip>

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/A429E32C-D484-424E-9C58-D9E287580817.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Notice NO ONE has claimed responsibility for bombing the Shia Mosque
Now ain't that strange?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Sure is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Not strange at all, if you know your history
The secretive and numerous "false-flag" operations are a hallmark of Totalitarian Nations and Imperial Amerika although we are new to Totalitarianism, is no different I think.

It was always a possibility.

Also, I find it interesting that the van used to murder the Lebanese Minister was found to have come through the Port of Dubai in UAE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Michael Ledeen:"One can only hope that we turn the region into a cauldron"
"One can only hope that we turn the region into a cauldron, and faster, please. If ever there were a region that richly deserved being cauldronized, it is the Middle East today. If we wage the war effectively, we will bring down the terror regimes in Iraq, Iran, and Syria, and either bring down the Saudi monarchy or force it to abandon its global assembly line to indoctrinate young terrorists. That's our mission in the war against terror." Michael Ledeen

http://www.irmep.org/dp_world.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Ever notice how not ever attack is "claimed?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Well that is true.
However I'm wondering, if sunni extremists blew up the Golden Dome in order to instigate sunni-shia civil war, why didn't they claim credit for doing so?

Wouldn't that have helped their objectives?

I'm also wondering about the timing of the attack. It seems that if the attackers had set off their bombs 30 minutes earlier they would have caused massive casulties to the daily morning prayer attendees. Once again, if the theory is that this was the work of sunni religious extremists, hell bent of causing a civil war, why not cause maximum damage?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. dang, forgot to get gas today.
will get it tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. OK: now I've got some loose ends I need to tie up.
According to what I've read, the Saudi's funnel a lot of money to terrorist groups. They have schools called 'madrasas' where they teach the kids to hate everything about the West.

The Saudis encourage and fund extremism. Of the 17 hijackers who flew the planes on 9/11, 15 of them were Saudis. Extremists, I'd say.

Can anyone explain to me why the Saudis would encourage groups like Al Qaida which will take apart their biggest source of livelihood? Why does all this seem contradictory?

Another question: Al Qaida in their statement above "to prevent the theft of Muslims' wealth by "crusaders and Jews". Is this also true? The Saudis get paid pretty well for their oil, don't they? And does this oil go to Israel?

If this is not true, somebody better give the facts to Al Qaida. Because they will be back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NIGHT TRIPPER Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. that makes no sense!! They hit their own $ source? Why would they ? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. CIAl Qaeda they mean
pretty transparent if you asks me. and of course a convenient oil price spike right afterwards. which benefits who exactly? hmmmmm. and all this stuff right before bush goes abroad, gotta love the timing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. It has to be the CIA, of course.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. British soldiers dressed as insurgents - any one ever hear more about that
or did it just drop down the memory hole too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Hear it all the time here.
Black-Ops do happen. It is not to say that all attacks are Black-Ops. Sometimes a cigar is a cigar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Dahr Jamail remembers....
http://dahrjamailiraq.com/weblog/archives/dispatches/000365.php

February 24, 2006
Who Benefits?
The most important question to ask regarding the bombings of the Golden Mosque in Samarra on the 22nd is: who benefits?

British Prime Minister Tony Blair stated that those who committed the attack on the Golden Mosque “have only one motive: to create a violent sedition between the Sunnis and the Shiites in order to derail the Iraqi rising democracy from its path.”

Well said Mr. Blair, particularly when we keep in mind the fact that less than a year ago in Basra, two undercover British SAS soldiers were detained by Iraqi security forces whilst traveling in a car full of bombs and remote detonators.

Jailed and accused by Muqtada al-Sadr and others of attempting to generate sectarian conflict by planting bombs in mosques, they were broken out of the Iraqi jail by the British military before they could be tried.


Posted by Dahr_Jamail at February 24, 2006 06:45 PM


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC