Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Muhammad 'Psychotic,' Medical Assessment Says (Maryland sniper)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:28 PM
Original message
Muhammad 'Psychotic,' Medical Assessment Says (Maryland sniper)
Muhammad 'Psychotic,' Medical Assessment Says

By Ernesto Londoño
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, March 29, 2006; Page B09

Sniper John Allen Muhammad is not competent to stand trial, his attorneys argued in a motion filed yesterday along with a psychiatric evaluation that says the defendant should not be allowed to defend himself during his murder trial because he is "psychotic, delusional" and "paranoid."

The report -- the first public disclosure of a mental health expert's assessment of the sniper's mind -- was filed a day before Muhammad is scheduled to appear before a judge in Rockville to explain why he wants to fire his attorneys and defend himself during his Montgomery County trial, which is scheduled to start May 1.

Yale University psychiatrist Dorothy O. Lewis, the defense expert who interviewed Muhammad twice in September 2003 and for four hours Monday, said the sniper told her that he is innocent and believes "his arrest was the result of an elaborate scheme to frame him for the murders."

She wrote that Muhammad told her he also believes Lee Boyd Malvo -- his alleged accomplice in the series of slayings committed with a high-powered rifle in October 2002 -- was "fed information by the police and forced to make a false confession."

Lewis wrote that Muhammad's judgment and ability to think logically are "severely compromised" by brain dysfunction and that he probably suffers from "schizo-affective schizophrenia."
(snip/...)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/28/AR2006032801910.html?nav=rss_metro
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Only a good psychiatrist knows for sure, but I find mental illness
a very plausible explanation for his actions.

My mom has schizo-affective schizophrenia. She lived through hell for over 20 years, and is now on psych meds FINALLY and in assisted living. She never hurt anybody, but I think that's just the luck of the draw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Most of them don't hurt anybody else
but their fear prevents them from trusting anyone enough to accept help, to take meds, often to eat and drink, and they end up killing themselves through self-enforced neglect.

The definition of "danger to oneself" needs to be expanded beyond imminent suicide, IMO.

I have a relative who goes off his meds and goes off the deep end periodically. He's wrecked his work history, his finances, his home, and alienated most of his friends during these episodes. There needs to be a mechanism to pick him out of the alley and take him in and get him back on his meds before he does such a thorough job.

The neglect of mental illness in this country is criminal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DELUSIONAL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. "The neglect of mental illness in this country is criminal."
I agree completely.

And with the closing of mental hospitals and no money for community mental health -- jails are housing many people who just need treatment& meds.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. My good friend's mom had schizophrenia & ended up in assisted living
on some meds and eventually died of cancer. So sad. The dad divorced the mom years before but continued to take care of her (as much as he could and the children could) for years. It was so difficult and sad. Best wishes to you and your mom. :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. They're just not used to Evangelical Fundamentalist christians
They've got that glazed-over look like a puppy chasing a ball that just screams, "I hear Jesus in my head all the time and I just have to tell you what he says!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. I have a problem with the finding of "not guilty by reason of insanity"
That is in general, and the jury so far has not found that in this case. But if you did the crime, you did the crime. You are still guilty. While I think insanity should come into play in the sentencing phase, I don't think it should play a role in whether a person is guilty or innocent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. the tip of that irresponisbility iceburg
Edited on Wed Mar-29-06 08:17 AM by sweetheart
I didn't do it, my crazy mind did,
The drug dealer sold it to me, i am innocent,
the cult leader made me place an ebay bid,
but i'm not responsible, somehow not sentient.
I didn't trash my previous relationship,
that it was predestined said the psychic clairvoyant,
I fell on the floor fresh-waxed ooh, I slipped,
its clearly the fault of the pavement inhabitant.

I started a war on the planet's other side,
But someone else caused it, fights and dies, unpentinent,
I retire as leader while in office smiling snide,
I can do whatever crime i want, i'm the fucking president.
Insanity is often the excuse of those culpable,
Seems sanity is even the more irresponsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. He has already been convicted and got the death penalty.
I am not sure why they would need a second trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Different state, different crime
He shot a multitude of people in Maryland and Virginia. I think Maryland was the first place they hit. But my post was not necessarily about this particular case, it was more about an "insanity" plea in general. Even if you are insane, you still did the crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 04:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC