Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Workers hurt in Iraq sue (truckers sue Halliburton for convoy attacks)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 11:52 AM
Original message
Workers hurt in Iraq sue (truckers sue Halliburton for convoy attacks)
Edited on Mon Apr-03-06 11:55 AM by Barrett808
Workers hurt in Iraq sue
Louie Gilot
El Paso Times
Monday, April 3, 2006

The fiery ambush of a fuel convoy in Iraq two years ago in which two area truckers were wounded, six private contractors were killed and American hostage Thomas Hamill was captured could have been prevented, a lawsuit alleges.

Truckers Raymond Stannard of El Paso and Eddie Sanchez of Silver City are among the 11 survivors of the convoy who, with the families of the six deceased truckers, are suing Halliburton and its subsidiary KBR for an unspecified amount in federal court in Houston.

Both truckers said new evidence unearthed by their lawyers, Lopez Hodes of Newport Beach, Calif., has changed their view of the incident.

"I thought it was a freak accident," said Sanchez, who is now a heavy duty mechanic at Phelps Dodge. "I kind of felt they wouldn't let us go out if it wasn't safe. It's a Fortune 500 company. I kind of feel betrayed."

Court documents filed in the lawsuit allege that officials with the military contracting giant knowingly sent the civilian truckers to Baghdad International Airport on a road where three convoys had been attacked the same morning and at least five had been attacked the day before.

(more)

http://www.borderlandnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060403/NEWS/604030346/1001

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aden_nak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Get ready for some ugliness.
I am fairly certain (unless it was dealt with earlier) that an executive order prevents suing any company involved in the reconstruction of Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. they chose to be war profiteers, so screw them
I hope they both lose somehow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Mercenaries on the open road
Sucks to be them

I wonder how much they made?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. These lame Bushbots think of ways to screw the American taxpayer
anyway they can. One way or the other, the US government will reimburse Halliburton for any liabilities.

As far as the truckers are concerned, they made hazard pay while in Iraq so STFU!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. too for them bad bush gave blanket immunity via exec order
http://deepblade.net/journal/2005/05/bush-extends-us-legal-immunity-in-iraq.html

Executive Order 13303, first entered by the president on May 22,2003, is one mechanism the US has used to insure financial impunity for private US interests in Iraq. Please see some contemporaneous analysis of this policy of corporate anarchy and its effects here and here.

According to one of the references from these sources -- the Government Accountability Project,
Activities exempt from accountability The scope of the EO's mandate for lawlessness is limited only by the imagination. Section 1(b) shields value ``of any nature whatsoever'' if it ``aris from'' or is ``related to'' the ``sale or marketing of all Iraqi petroleum and petroleum products" or ``interests.'' That means all corporate activities with roots or any connection to Iraqi oil. It covers everything from extraction through transportation, advertising, manufacture, customer service, corporate records and payment of taxes. It covers compliance with contractual obligations involving Iraqi oil that industry enters with the U.S. government in post-war Iraq. The scope can be further expanded to virtually all oil-related commerce, by blending Iraqi oil with domestic supplies for any given commercial transaction. Since the EO also covers petroleum ``products,'' It includes commerce such as plastics in the petrochemical industry or anything else for which Iraqi oil becomes relevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justice1 Donating Member (483 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. Interesting responses
The wages of truck drivers are going down in the U.S. because Mexican drivers can do it cheaper. That's okay, because their just trying to support their family. However, the American isn't considered a family man, but a war profiteer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. You gotta wonder about someone who turns something into
hate mexicans moment.

How obvious can you get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. I hope these truckers find a way to win, or at least make it big public
Edited on Mon Apr-03-06 03:50 PM by superconnected
news about what Haliburton is doing.

Sure they shouldn't have been there cashing in, but one of my favorite passtimes IS watching the right eat itself.

Dems can't stop them. We're too nice. They pretty much have to destroy themsevles from within.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. They should sue GW
for not providing a safe work environment for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC