Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYC'S (un-named) Terror Bank ($3bil to Hamas, Al Qaeda & Hexbollah)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 12:33 PM
Original message
NYC'S (un-named) Terror Bank ($3bil to Hamas, Al Qaeda & Hexbollah)
Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau has shut down a massive terror-finance pipeline in which a whopping $3 billion in profits from drug deals and other crimes flowed through a major New York bank to Middle East fanatics, The Post has learned.

Morgenthau told The Post his office is pursuing a settlement involving possible penalties against one of the largest and most prominent banks in New York - which he declined to identify - for maintaining an account where funds that originated in South America's notorious "tri-border region" were rerouted to suspect accounts in the Middle East.

Evidence developed in the course of a three-year probe, which has already resulted in charges against other New York-based financial institutions, revealed that about $3 billion that flowed through the account over a two-year period was going to terror groups Hamas, al Qaeda and Hezbollah, Morgenthau said.


http://www.nypost.com/php/pfriendly/print.php?url=http://www.nypost.com/news/regionalnews/61931.htm

Okay... why the local DA rather than the Fed's? Why not name the "most prominent bank"? And one more time we see authorities asserting that they are monitoring activities for years on end (phone calls and banking) rather than stopping them and arresting people. This story raises more questions than it answers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wouldn't be surprised if it's Bank of America ...
they don't give a fuck how or where they get their money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Robert Morgenthau
Edited on Mon Apr-03-06 12:44 PM by seemslikeadream
Wasn't he involved in the BCCI

yes I thought so
http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:vqcWzigPb98J:www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2004/0409.sirota.html+Robert+Morgenthau+bcci&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1
Kerry opted in 1989 to take the same information that had been coldly received at the Justice Department and bring it to New York District Attorney Robert Morgenthau, who agreed to begin a criminal investigation of BCCI, based on Kerry's leads. Kerry also continued to keep up the public pressure. In 1990, when the Bush administration gave the bank a minor slap on the wrist for its money laundering practices, Kerry went on national television to slam the decision. "We send drug people to jail for the rest of their life," he said, "and these guys who are bankers in the corporate world seem to just walk away, and it's business as usual…When banks engage knowingly in the laundering of money, they should be shut down. It's that simple, it really is."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. I sure hope they don't let whatever country it is in to run our ports
GOD forbid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anotherdrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. bank big-wig went to columbia a few years ago, anyone remeber that story?
It was clear he was courting drug money and many said so. Would have been 2 to 3 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. It'll sure be interesting to see how far the tenacles spread on this one.
Laundering just hops from one large financial institution to another it seems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anotherdrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. bet they spread right to the top, let's hope this isn't the end of this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Tit for tat profiteering always does involve the top financiers.
Drugs for guns. Infrastructure for oil. Babies for bombs. Ports for terrorism.

Just once, I'd like to witness a total blow-out of all the profiteering blow-hards selling out human rights and safety to the highest bidder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anotherdrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. why would any of this money be going to the middle east I wonder?
How exactly do arab terorists on the other side of the planet muscle their way into tightly controled black cash flows from drug money laundering? Perhaps Al'CIAda might be a little cash strapped for a few weeks now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anotherdrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. my bet is on: Citibank - they've done such fine work for Raul Salinas
or Citigroup to be more exact
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'd like to see more attention drawn to your question, "why the local DA,.
,...rather than the feds?"

If the feds are tracking like they say they are,...how come this is still happening? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. Recommened so these questions can be answered and DU
is where one goes to find answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anotherdrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. whatever happened to Operation Greenquest? FBI ruined it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
m0nkeyneck Donating Member (274 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. CIA accounts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sven77 Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
14. Bush Banks
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riggs_Bank

Why is Jonathan J. Bush never mention in relation to Riggs Bank. The President's uncle was named President, CEO, and Director of the bank on 5/31/2000.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A52591-2004Jul15.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
15. Now disclosed to be the Bank of America
April 4, 2006 -- WASHINGTON - The Manhattan DA is pursuing a settlement with the Bank of America in a major money-laundering probe of more than $3 billion that flowed from Latin America through one of the bank's accounts to Mideast fanatics, sources said yesterday.

http://www.nypost.com/news/regionalnews/66443.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. ever wonder who is really propping up
drug traffickers, and real terrorists? Didn't Clinton attempt to get legislation passed to monitor money laundering, specifically for terrorist activities, and the Republican Congress voted against it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. No - Kerry wrote and attempted to get money laundering legislation
after his work on BCCI. After 911, Kerry's international money laundering work was included in the Patriot Act. During the Clinton administration, he got little help or support from Clinton. Clinton also didn't have the justice department reopen the BCCI case. In the summary that Kerry wrote of outstanding issues - one mentioned was learning more about BCCI funding of AQ Khan's bomb. (It also noted the need for more investigation of Marc Rich.)

The sad thing is that if the BCCI work was continued, there was a possibility that we could have prevented Khan's technology and materials going to Iran and North Korea. Kerry did as much as he could - he worked on it until his committee and supoena power ended, he then atempted to get the Bush justice department to handle it, then finally gave it to Morgenthau. He also wrote "New War" that warned about these risks. Clinton, who did far more than W on terrorism, didn't do all he could on these issues - likely not seeing them as worth the political capital to fight for.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. thanks for the info
I was disappointed with Clinton because he didn't delve into the Iran-Contra and BCCI scandal. However, I thought during his second term he attempted to do money laundering legislation and was voted down by Congress. If Iran-Contra and the BCCI connections were fully exposed and those who were involved truly punished, I don't think we'd be in the mess we are today and dealing with the same felons. Also, I remember Casolero writing that it was much deeper, even with the theft of the Promis Software.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC