Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iran leader hails rising oil prices as ‘very good’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 11:06 AM
Original message
Iran leader hails rising oil prices as ‘very good’
Updated: 9:39 a.m. ET April 21, 2006
TEHRAN, Iran - Iran’s president said on Friday the rise in oil price was “very good,” Iran’s Mehr News Agency reported, emphasizing the hawkish position of the world’s fourth largest oil exporter as crude prices have hit record levels.

“The increase of the oil price and growth of oil income is very good and we hope that the oil prices reach their real levels,” Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said as he toured an oil exhibition in Tehran, the agency reported.

He did not say what those real levels should be. But these and other earlier remarks suggest he believes crude prices should rise above this week’s record high of over $74 a barrel. On Friday, European Brent crude fell below $73.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12417998/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shain from kane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oil been very good to me. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. free market capitalism!
Americans should have no problem with this, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlipperySlope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Personally, I don't have a problem.
Let the markets decide the price of Oil.

Better then letting the warmongers sent troops everywhere to hold Oil down.

Besides, higher oil prices help Hugo Chavez, and he is THE MAN!




:toast: :toast: :toast: :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. The right-wingers don't want to drill more oil.
They want CONTROL over oil supplies, not more of it. Their intention is not to keep oil prices down but rather to control supplies to keep them up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Well whatever the fuck they are trying to do "AIN'T" working...
They should stop thinking because it's killing us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. They want higher prices. It's working from their perspective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. there is more than one way to kick your enemy in the balls...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's good for "coal country"
Edited on Fri Apr-21-06 11:40 AM by Coastie for Truth
---like West Virginia and the Monongahela Valley and I-70 corridors in Pennsylvania, and across Ohio and Indiana and Illinois on I-70, and down through West Virginia and Kentucky on I-79.

Why.

Because "Fischer-Tropsch Gasoline" is now cheaper then gasoline from crude oil. Link to article in Wikipedia -

Don't knock Fischer-Tropsch gasoline from domestic coal -- I worked in a Fischer-Tropsch lab and pilot plant when I was in college. The only real problem with Fischer-Tropsch was that OPEC could cut the cartelized price of crude and thereby kill Fischer-Tropsch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Yes. Interesting Reuters article on this today
right here: http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=reutersEdge&storyID=2006-04-21T090655Z_01_NOA132477_RTRUKOC_0_ANALYSIS-LIQUID-COAL.xml

...Industrial giant China is leading the way and others may follow since oil has hit records above $70 on strained supplies that may last around 40 years, whereas the world may have ample coal for a couple of hundred years if it can be converted to clean fuels cheaply enough.

"In the light of very high oil prices and slowing coal prices, coal-to-liquids technologies are becoming a burning issue in developing Asia and the United States," said Alexandre Kervinio of SG Commodities.

China's largest coal producer Shenhua Group Corp. and South Africa's Sasol say their coal-to-liquids technology is worthwhile if oil stays above $30 or $35 a barrel, half its current price. New York oil futures for December 2012 delivery are above $66.

High oil prices have also made clean renewable energies such as wind competitive, but these cannot deliver liquid fuel to power cars. Biofuels are booming but are likely to remain limited in volume, and a wide network of hydrogen gas filling stations for fuel cell vehicles is not considered viable before 2020.

However, other technologies such as coal gasification and gas-to-liquids (GTL) are currently cheaper than coal liquefaction and so firms worried about a downturn in oil prices and seeking the best investment returns may opt for those instead.

<snip>

The United States is building a fleet of new coal power plants to use the world's largest reserves, but only a fraction will gasify coal and have the ability to capture emissions of greenhouse gases, blamed for global warming.

However, the U.S. government is hoping to wean itself off Middle East oil dependency and is providing tax and loan incentives. This has spurred five projects expected to be onstream by 2010, said SG Commodities.

"Converting just 5 percent of the U.S. coal reserves to Fisher-Tropsch fuels would equate to the existing U.S. crude reserves of 29 billion barrels," said a spokesman for Canadian company Syntroleum, refering to liquefaction technology.

/more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. To think
my first job was in Fischer-Tropsch at Bruceton Lab, worked p/t while in college on Fischer-Tropsch, then turned down a well paying assistantship in Fischer Tropsch at West Virginia Univ - cause "I didn't want to go anywhere that would offer me THAT MUCH MONEY."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenman3610 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. the only language Joe Sixpack understands
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 05:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. A fool and his full SUV tank are swiftly parted.
The sooner SUV Merka learns to drive reasonably-sized cars, the better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. As a farm-owner, I like it when corn and soy bean prices go up,
so I'm hardly shocked by this from an oil producer.

Jimmy Carter tried to get us to address the problem of our dependence on foreign oil and was vilified for doing so.

Wake up, America.

And selling a limited natural resource for whatever price it can command is one thing. The gouging of consumers by the big oil companies is another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. This is the only thing that may stop WWIII.
If oil goes over $4.00 a gallon this summer there is no way the Decider can invade Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jseankil Donating Member (604 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. $100 billion should be annually allocated for alternative energy sources
fund the project in the name of national security. Take it from the defense budget, it's the best defense project that this nation can undertake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anakie Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. won't the price of oil rise even more when sanctions are
imposed on Iran - or will oil be exempt. Maybe the Iranians plan to keep and sell their oil at top price while they develop a nuclear energy industry. Sort of like a dealer with a major addict and only a limited supply of heroin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
17. "Bush agrees but declines comment."
:smirk:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
18. Nothing new here at all
Edited on Sat Apr-22-06 07:04 AM by depakid
Even the old Shah of Iran was a proponent of extremely high oil prices. It took the wiley Sheik Yamani to convince OPEC that it was in their interest to reign in prices, lest the West to conserve and convert to alternative energy sources.

Now of course- that's no longer a concern. The US is hopelessly addicted- and the Republicans will ensure that responsible measures are NEVER taken to encourage conservation or jump start conversion.

Best of all possible worlds for Iran and Saudi Arabia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC