Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheney exempts his own office from reporting on classified material

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 08:27 PM
Original message
Cheney exempts his own office from reporting on classified material

http://www.belleville.com/mld/belleville/news/politics/14462039.htm

Cheney exempts his own office from reporting on classified material
BY MARK SILVA
Chicago Tribune

WASHINGTON - As the Bush administration has dramatically accelerated the classification of information as "top secret" or "confidential," one office is refusing to report on its annual activity in classifying documents: the office of Vice President Dick Cheney.

A standing executive order, strengthened by President Bush in 2003, requires all agencies and "any other entity within the executive branch" to provide an annual accounting of their classification of documents. More than 80 agencies have collectively reported to the National Archives that they made 15.6 million decisions in 2004 to classify information, nearly double the number in 2001, but Cheney continues to insist he is exempt.

Explaining why the vice president has withheld even a tally of his office's secrecy when such offices as the National Security Council routinely report theirs, a spokeswoman said Cheney is "not under any duty" to provide it.

That is only one way the Bush administration, from its opening weeks in 2001, has asserted control over information. By keeping secret so many directives and actions, the administration has precluded the public - and often members of Congress - from knowing about some of the most significant decisions and acts of the White House.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nobody asks the Boss where he was during that long lunch.
Edited on Sat Apr-29-06 08:32 PM by leveymg
We all know who's in charge, and he doesn't have to explain himself.

"We don't need no stinking badges."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sigh. What else is new! How I hate these subhumans.
:kick: and R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. impeachment and incarceration cannot happen too soon. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
27. I rather see them executed after their trial
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh please, someone shoot this guy down! Figuratively of course. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Cheney's usual to the American public: Go f*$$! yourself & if you leak,
Edited on Sat Apr-29-06 08:54 PM by wordpix
you'll be prosecuted. Of course, BushCo can leak anything they want with impunity...so they think right now, anyhow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is what it means to be King...
I can do anything I like without any accountability...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. Gotta protect those secetive Spring 2001 Energy Meetings
and all else sinister.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
19. as article points out--this began well before 9/11 (more)

......In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the administration has based much of its need for confidentiality on the imperative of protecting national security at a time of war. Yet experts say Bush and his closest advisers demonstrated their proclivity for privacy well before Sept. 11:

Starting in the early weeks of his administration with a move to protect the papers of former presidents, Bush has clamped down on the release of government documents. That includes tougher standards for what the public can obtain under the Freedom of Information Act and the creation of a broad new category of "sensitive but unclassified information."

Not only has the administration reported a dramatic increase in the number of documents deemed "top secret," "secret" or "confidential," the president has authorized the reclassification of information that was public for years. An audit by a National Archives office recently found that the CIA acted in a "clearly inappropriate" way regarding about one-third of the documents it reclassified last year.

The White House has resisted efforts by Congress to gain information, starting with a White House energy task force headed by Cheney and continuing with the president's secret authorization of warrantless surveillance of people inside the United States suspected of communicating with terrorists abroad. Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., recently threatened to withhold funding for the surveillance program unless the White House starts providing information.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. of course THEY are 'above the law'. blech.
what a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. From "Of the people, by the people, and for the people" to F&*# you.
Edited on Sat Apr-29-06 09:44 PM by bleever


Nice, Dick.


ed: exact quote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. So who can we tell that will get this message out?
Chicago Tribune is a good source.

IF we all barrage, CNN will they cover it?

IF we send to the NYT and WaPo will they cover it?

Can we get Helen Thomas to ask about it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. how can this not be ILLEGAL?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. Read this from The American Prospect
http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewPrint&articleId=11401

A lengthy article on Cheney--if you can stand it and haven't just eaten lunch!
Much of what we've assumed about him is true. And yes,he was/is the major policy guy on Iraq. PNAC all the way, baby. The chimp just goes along because "freedom is on the march". But some of the neocons actually predicted the debacle that's happened--and let it happen anyway to further their quest for power in the Middle East. It's all about keeping the oil away from China--death and destruction be damned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
13. Fucking OUTRAGEOUS.
We have lost the country.
Our government is a sham.
I have no words to express how
completely outraged I am by the
latest mass of chicanery by these thugs.
BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. the zero-accountability presidency. worst.administration.ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. Utter corruption.
The scary part is they still have 32% support. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. Yip!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anchor of hope Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. Classified Information
The primary reason that the Bush-Cheney administration wishes to classify so much information is not because of the War on Terror, although that venue provides them with a convenient opportunity to accomplish what they couldn't normally accomplish. Rather, it is to prevent what happened to Bill Clinton, from happening to the Bushes- the "absence of evidence" prevents criticism by future historians and minimizes criticism from political opponents. A recipe to permanently stay in power, synonymous with a dictatorship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. Welcome to DU. Agreed.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. When Dems regain control of the government, they need to focus
on sending these fascists to prison for their crimes and corruption.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
18. "executive authority is supreme and significantly unchecked." I guess
this does not surprize anyone here.


....But after the Sept. 11 attacks, and amid growing concern about information that terrorists might obtain from the government, then-Bush Chief of Staff Andrew Card issued an order in March 2002 demanding that any "Sensitive but Unclassified Information" related to homeland security be released only after careful consideration "on a case-by-case basis."

That has led to a proliferation of documents stamped "Sensitive but Unclassified" or simply "For Office Use Only," according to experts who track government record-keeping.

The Bush administration is "objectively more secretive" than its recent predecessors, Aftergood said.

"Anyone who calls or writes a government agency for information encounters barriers that were just not there a decade ago," he said. "The government is undergoing a mutation in which we are gradually shifting into another kind of government in which executive authority is supreme and significantly unchecked."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
20. "new category of "sensitive but unclassified information."




....Starting in the early weeks of his administration with a move to protect the papers of former presidents, Bush has clamped down on the release of government documents. That includes tougher standards for what the public can obtain under the Freedom of Information Act and the creation of a broad new category of "sensitive but unclassified information."

Not only has the administration reported a dramatic increase in the number of documents deemed "top secret," "secret" or "confidential," the president has authorized the reclassification of information that was public for years. An audit by a National Archives office recently found that the CIA acted in a "clearly inappropriate" way regarding about one-third of the documents it reclassified last year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 05:23 AM
Response to Original message
22. WTF
WTF HAS HE BEEN UP TO???????????????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. if they told us
then they'd have to ... well, you know the rest of the ditty.


i have no doubt . . .
dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
24. Power-hungry asshat!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
25. Is this the new Issue "Tyrranny for Dummies"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC