FT: Electronic voting switch (and problems) threatens mass confusion

[UpInArms]

http://news.ft.com/cms/s/a1b985a4-d960-11da-8b06-0000779e2340.html

The last three election cycles in the US have been marked by controversy not only about candidates, but also about the fairness and accuracy of the voting process. And as voters head to the polls today for primaries in some jurisdictions, the coming cycle promises more of the same.

With about 8,000 separate election authorities managing approximately 175,000 polling places and perhaps as many as 150,000 different ballot forms that include choices for everyone from senator to dogcatcher, American elections are complex even when all goes well. But this cycle sees many states and smaller jurisdictions making last-minute efforts to switch to electronic voting, and early signs of trouble are appearing.

In California, the League of Women Voters has protested against a new, computerised statewide election registry that the group says is improperly rejecting registered voters, while county clerks in several Indiana jurisdictions complained that the electronic ballots programmed by the vendors of their electronic voting machines had been delivered late, were incorrect and poorly proofread.

<snip>

In Florida, ground zero for election disasters in 2000, the election supervisor for Leon County allowed anti-electronic voting activists to try breaching security in the county’s optical scan voting system, prompting the big three electronic voting systems companies – Diebold, Election Systems & Services, and Sequoia – to refuse to sell the county new machines. The Florida secretary of state has since opened an anti-trust investigation.

...more...

[peacetalksforall]

1. Is this all they can get them for - anti-trust? n/t

[SoCalDem]

2. Electronic voting switch threatens mass confusion

http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&ct=us/8-0&fp=4456e41d264b8052&ei=5_ZWRNjwI4e6pwLjqcD-BA&url=http%3A//msnbc.msn.com/id/12584001/&cid=1106207329


Electronic voting switch threatens mass confusion
MSNBC - 6 hours ago
Sewanee, Tennessee. The last three election cycles in the US have been marked by controversy not only about candidates, but also about the fairness and accuracy of the voting process.


Electronic voting switch threatens mass confusion
By Henry Hamman,Henry Hamman -- Sewanee, Tennessee

Updated: 1:42 a.m. ET May 2, 2006

The last three election cycles in the US have been marked by controversy not only about candidates, but also about the fairness and accuracy of the voting process. And as voters head to the polls today for primaries in some jurisdictions, the coming cycle promises more of the same.

With about 8,000 separate election authorities managing approximately 175,000 polling places and perhaps as many as 150,000 different ballot forms that include choices for everyone from senator to dogcatcher, American elections are complex even when all goes well. But this cycle sees many states and smaller jurisdictions making last-minute efforts to switch to electronic voting, and early signs of trouble are appearing.

In California, the League of Women Voters has protested against a new, computerised statewide election registry that the group says is improperly rejecting registered voters, while county clerks in several Indiana jurisdictions complained that the electronic ballots programmed by the vendors of their electronic voting machines had been delivered late, were incorrect and poorly proofread.

The clerk for Marion County – the state's most populous – said that, so far, nine rounds of "fixes" had been required; she was unsure whether the primary vote today could be held without problems, according to The Indianapolis Star.

The scramble to convert to electronic voting has spurred disputes with vendors of the new machines. Last month, Oregon filed a breach of contract lawsuit against Election Systems & Software, alleging that the company reneged on a commitment to supply the state with electronic voting machines suitable for handicapped people for its May 16 primary.

snippety snip

[Wilms]

3. Pleased and amazed to see this.

It even mentions the GAO Report.

[Viva_La_Revolution]

4. Paper ballots! Hand counts! NOW!

that is all.




we now return you to your regularly scheduled program....

[goclark]

6. And what are we going to DO to make sure that happens?

I see no PLAN to make that happen.

It is now May and the Democrats have NO PLAN for Paper ballots and the majority of the people don't even understand why it is so important.


When are we going to get behind an idea to involve the masses? When?

Please read my Journal thread on a Boston Tea Party ....

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/goclark

[DoYouEverWonder]

5. The GOP wins again

by destroying our electoral system.

Up until 2000, elections were no big deal and people had faith in the system. Now that faith has been shatter and it's very much part of the GOP plan to destroy the integrity of our voting system, so that no one will ever trust the results in any election. They know they can't win fair and square, so they want to make sure that no one else can win either, at least not without having cast doubt and mistrust over any and all results.