Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iranian official: We may recognize Israel

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:54 AM
Original message
Iranian official: We may recognize Israel
Top nuclear scientist also says Tehran 'playing with international community but will stop when it senses rope has been pulled too far'


http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3246312,00.html

<snip>

"An Iranian scientist involved with the country's nuclear program claimed his country could recognize Israel in several of years, Israel's leading newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth reported Tuesday.

"Iran may recognize Israel in a number of years," Dr. Rahman Garmanpoor, a manager of the Iranian nuclear program, told the Italian newspaper Il Giornale.

"Some of our society believes that we must be neutral, but the policies of the new president Ahmadinejad and his warring statements are tied to internal politics. This is a new government, that must consolidate its power," he said.

Dr. Garmanpoor, 35, said that his government is 'playing' with the international community, but that it would stop doing so the minute it felt it had pulled the rope too far.

"It's enough for the West to recognize Tehran's right to hold a nuclear research lab in order for Iran to declare its readiness to end nuclear development and return to negotiations," said Garmanpoor."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Too bad BushCo didn't cooperate
with the more moderate government that was in place when he took office.

Instead he turned his back and ingored them while more radical leaders cames to power.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. "his warring statements are tied to internal politics"
A lot of that seems to be going around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes, they need to keep their so called President QUIET!
Then maybe there will be some glimmer of hope for diplomacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Well, if we can't, what makes you think the Iranians will be able to?
There's a synergistic relationship here. Our war-mongering religious fanatic justifies theirs, which justifies Israel's, which justifies Iran's, and around and around it goes.

Seems to me that Regime Change at home is a good place for us to start. Less chance of nuclear fallout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hezekkia Donating Member (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. I really wish I had a solution to the Iran problem
I really am at a loss for a positive solution that won't lead to Israel's decimation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. And we need to keep OUR so called President quiet....
Hmmm.... Perhaps we could send them both on a long trip--on a slow boat. I hear Easter Island is pretty this time of year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. I think we should start with our so called President of the United States
I sure don't see junior striving for peace in the Middle East like Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. You know what would be a good alternative energy for Iran?
Solar.

I hear it's very warm and sunny there.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. I hear it is sunny THROUGHOUT the Middle East.
So solar would work in every country there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigma000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. if you believe this, I've got this bridge I'm selling cheap n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Why Wouldn't Iran Recognize Israel?
If they believed their survival depended on it, it's an attractive option.

Iran's relationship with Arabs in general is pretty strained. They might make an under-the-table nonaggression pact in order to avoid an Israeli strike.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigma000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. it goes against everything that the Islamic Republic stands for

what does Iran want? A reestablished caliphate perhaps (under Shia leadership? That could get ugly)

Recognizing Israel would be like Nazi Germany letting Jews assume government leadership positions, like Soviet Russia opening a stock market, like the US reinstating slavery. It is contrary to the whole point of their world-views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. It *Does* Go Against Everything They Stand for
but countries will do surprising things when their survival is threatened or to gain other political goals. The Taliban made agreements with the US. The Soviets signed a nonaggression pact with the Nazis, then allied themselves with the US, Britain, and France. For that matter, Egypt signed a major treaty with the Israelis and the PLO made deep concessions in its position on Israel in order to govern the West Bank and Gaza.

I do think that Iran is testing the international community to see how far it can go. It may overstep itself and have to take drastic measures to prevent invasion or a massive air assault. Recognizing Israel would be offensive, but by no means unthinkable.

Ahmadinejad himself seems to be a loose cannon, but the mullahs still hold most of the political power. If they think he's committing national suicide, they'll pull back on the reins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hadrons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
7. "An Iranian scientist ...."
sorry, but I don't believe a 35 year old scientist, even the manager of the Iranian nuclear program, has all that much say in Iranian policy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I don't think he' s policy maker...
But he was allowed to speak out. Since he's a relatively young, he may represent the next generation coming to power in Iran. There is hope for the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
13. The chances of Iran recognizing Israel are zero.
That would be the denial of their whole reason for being... that the great satans of the U.S. and Israel must be crushed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJ Democrats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
17. I highly doubt this
The chances are about 1 in a trillion or higher. There is no way, these two countries are enemies. Why would the President of iran, who has made all those remarks about Israel go and recognize them? It ain't happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
18. People seem to forget that by the late 1990s, a huge moderation movement..
that centered on Democratization was very popular in Iran. Most of the young people are sick and tired of rule by mullahs, hell, they protested against them. They even were able to get a moderate president in, unfortunately, the Mullahs thought the reforms were happening too quickly, and started consolidating power again. Not to mention that the United States was popular with the majority of Iran's population before Bush came into office, now look at what he has wrought, another opportunity down the tubes because of Bush's incompetence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC