Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US and Europe Draft Iran Resolution

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 04:25 PM
Original message
US and Europe Draft Iran Resolution
US and Europe Draft Iran Resolution

New York Times - 1 hour ago
PARIS, May 2 — The United States, Britain and France have drafted a binding Security Council resolution requiring Iran to stop key nuclear activities, but Russia and China are already resisting, officials involved in the negotiations said today. ...

http://news.google.com/nwshp?hl=en&tab=wn&q=

http://www.nytimes.com/glogin?URI=http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/02/world/middleeast/02cnd-iran.html&OQ=_rQ3D1&OP=10eb7526Q2FKVQ51mKQ5DXAgyXX6fKfQ25Q25Q20KQ25wKQ25fKVXyQ24Q5DKn0Q5DQ5DQ24Q51Q51Dg6KQ25fAJQ5D50yDJTQ3C6nQ24
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is truly amazing.
The US must have Europe over a barrel. It's incredible how weak and submissive they are to Washington.

Fact: Europe purchases oil from Iran. I'm not sure where they could get petroleum if Iran decides to dump them. Russia just agreed to divert about 100,000 barrels of oil to Venezuela, of all places.

All this rhetoric is pushing the price of oil upward. Ahmadinejad loves it. Chavez loves it. Bush is tanking from this.

Unbelievable.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Does it feel like 1941 yet?
My father says he has never lived through a more dangerous time. And he lived through the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDebug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. But these fellas are no JFK or Khrushchev
The Cuban Missile Crisis was averted because the two presidents didn't want a war, however this time the leaders are Bush and Ahmadinejad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Exactly.
I feel like we are sleepwalking into an apocalypse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Had Bush been President during the Cuban Missile Crisis
the human race would have become extinct in 1962!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I just got this horrible image in my head.
Of Bush pounding his chest exclaiming, "I feel good!" as nukes detonate around him.

:nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke:"I feel good!":nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke:

I hope Swamp Rat comes over and illustrates this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Nah! We would have been safe under our school desks, remember! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Duck and Cover!
How can I forget!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Keep pounding that sand, fellas. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Here's more on this.
EU Nations Outline U.N. Iran Resolution

May 2, 7:20 PM (ET)

By ANGELA CHARLTON


PARIS (AP) - European nations, backed by the United States, outlined Tuesday a planned U.N. Security Council resolution to give "mandatory force" to the atomic watchdog agency's demands that Iran halt uranium enrichment, officials said.

U.S. Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns dismissed any possibility of direct talks with Iran but said he had not "given up hope on diplomacy." He also predicted Europe would agree within three months to support sanctions against Iran over its nuclear activities, which Washington suspects are aimed at manufacturing atomic weapons.

"Diplomacy has to be hard-edged. Isolation is what we believe will work best," Burns said Tuesday.
"Within a month or two or three, you are going to see international support for sanctions," he added.

Burns was speaking at the start of talks in Paris by envoys from six nations in Paris. They discussed the possibility of a resolution under Chapter 7 of the U.N. Charter, which makes any demands mandatory and allows for the use of sanctions - and possibly force - if they are not obeyed.

http://apnews1.iwon.com/article/20060502/D8HBUIMO6.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDebug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. May/June/July/August
Three month plus an additional month for the final pressure on the UN and Iran can be attacked before the November elections. Right on schedule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. How can they hope for diplomacy when they refuse to talk? And are
sanctions really considered a diplomatic lever? Seems their idea of diplomacy is anything except diplomacy and just short of blowing the place into pieces.

Burns dismissed any possibility of direct talks with Iran but said he had not "given up hope on diplomacy

and this...

"We'll see how the Iranians react once there is a Chapter 7 resolution with these demands on them," he said. "Certainly, the issue of sanctions and other diplomatic levers are out there," either through the Security Council, individual states or like-minded states acting together, he added.

My God! I never thought I'd live to see the day where I'd find myself considering the leaders of Russia and China to be the rational, logical ones in a debate with my own country. How the hell did we get here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Congress pass the Iran Freedom Act by 327-21
What is there to talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Noooooo! They passed that Santorum piece of shit? They've been
pushing that for the last couple of years. Ros-Lehtinen from FL gave it the first round in '04.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. Yeah, that scares me.
After it passes the Senate, Dumbya will say, "Hey, Congress gave me all the authority for regime change that I need! Let's roll!"

And just like Iraq, it's not about the weapons. The only threat they pose to us is through their OIL!


Iran Freedom Support Act: Big surprise, it's the oil, stupid!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1093948
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. Sorry but 3 outta 5 translates into jack shit.
Looks like the 3 idiot countries are set on starting WWIII. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. 3 out of 6
Germany position in LIMBO
Not 5
Anyway it cant get through SC
And yeah bush get his coliation of willing on this
Rest of the world just give no shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I can't see the Germans agreeing with a new war plan.
Bush will have to go it alone this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Sometime bush damn stupid
Already Russia and China say no sanction
bush damn stupid pushing like hell end up face in turd.

Colbert right

He do what he wants I guess
On Monday and do same on Wedesday no matter what happened on Tuesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I just read an article today that said Germany was investing in Iran
so I doubt they'd be on-board for the "adventure".

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/042706_paradigm_speech.shtml

snip>

• The US government is playing a bluff hand over an attack against Iran , which in spite of being both unlikely and risking a global nuclear holocaust, has resulted in massive increases in military spending all around the planet. A global arms race is now using up energy and commodities that should be used rebuilding railroads, enhancing mass transportation, and building renewable infrastructure to soften the coming blows.

• In the face of this, the entire world, and especially China , Russia , India , Germany and Japan are pouring hundreds of billions of dollars of investment into Iran . This is one of many sure signs that the American Empire’s weaknesses are becoming visible. There is blood in the water and blood in the water usually leads to a fight. The world, at least as far as its pocketbook is concerned, is betting on Iran .

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Nothing to bet
Line in Sand
No more attacking another nation

Period
Sanction :rofl: US can do what it wants Dont give no shit to this.

Anyway he the DECIDER so he get to decide on this :rofl:

Take you pick
Back down and eat crap
Or go fuck your own country

Either way fine with the rest of the world
After all his first duty is to do what best for his country people
If he think this is best that is not for rest of world to decide, we not decider
The US people is.

Iran has nothing to fear from US...... PERIOD
You got 10,000 nukes .... GO SUCK ON IT


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
20. Cuban missile crisis, 1962 - THEY HAD PROOF back then - REAL proof
.
.
.

Satellite photos of silos, and offloading of missiles to the Cuban mainland


The photos were in newspapers all over the world - yeah - even here in Canada

I know this well, because it was a presentation I made in my classroom in Grade 7 or 8 - and I presented it with the newspaper articles, satellite photographs and so on

Bushco has produced nothing even CLOSE to this as proof of a "danger" to the continental USA

Kennedy was assassinated within a year of preventing this war. (think about that a bit)

Yet 100's of thousands die at George's command, with only insinuations, suspicions, and fear-mongering.

USA's voting population has really got dumber

But that's just my Canuk Opinion

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
22. UN powers differ on Iran

Envoys from the top five UN powers, plus Germany, said late on Tuesday that a "firm" international response is needed over Iran's nuclear programme, but remained at odds over what measures to take.

The statement from the envoys came after a meeting in Paris ended without agreement.

The talks were the first among senior representatives of Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States, as well as Germany, since the International Atomic Energy told the Security Council last Friday that Iran was in breach of a UN demand to halt uranium enrichment.

Nicholas Burns, the number three in the US State Department, said after the meeting with counterparts from the other countries that "all agreed that the Iran nuclear programme should be suspended, and agreed to begin Security Council debate and start negotiating a resolution for suspension".

But Burns also voiced frustration with permanent Security Council members Russia and China which are opposing the United States and its EU allies.

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/F8768F43-555F-4A12-A4C8-F7B2D2CDA072.htm




http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/F8768F43-555F-4A12-A4C8-F7B2D2CDA072.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. BAD move, the USA bumping heads with China and Russia at this point
.
.
.

We ain't talking no "cold" war here

and all over a country that couldn't hurt Continental USA in it's wildest dreams.

But it WILL hurt USA interests BADLY around Iran's borders should it so much as SPIT on Iranian soil.

Time for the bully to back off

Go Home

and take care of it's own citizens

But alas

The PNACers don't give a hoot for the citizens of the USA

Other than to use their taxes to forward their goal of global domination

(sigh)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
24. So Europe is made up solely of Britain and France
And Russia's not in Europe. Interesting geography lesson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
26.  War to make those poll numbers rise, prior to the October vote.
Looks like we are on the brink of WWIII folks. My spell check doesn't recognize WWIII, but it will soon and next to it will be 43's face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. If it happens before October, they probably won't let me vote.
I remember that alternet article you posted. If we attack Iran, that might become regular domestic policy:

It appears the newly formed U.S. Detention camps are for real.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=364&topic_id=499461
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Robert, Thanks for understanding the severity of that article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Thank you, sarcasmo, for making me aware of it!
Have you seen the movie Punishment Park? Fictional movie about detention camps during the Nixon administration, but told in a documentary style that makes you think, "It could happen here".

If you combine the worst parts of Nixon and the worst parts of Reagan, and stuff it into Dan Quayle's brain, that's what Dumbya is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC