Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate ignores veto threat, passes war-funds bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 11:56 AM
Original message
Senate ignores veto threat, passes war-funds bill
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate on Thursday passed a bill to fund the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and hurricane recovery efforts, ignoring a veto threat from President George W. Bush because it includes money for expensive projects he did not request.

By a vote of 78-20, the Senate approved an emergency bill that would spend about $108.9 billion this year, $14.4 billion more than Bush requested.

The House of Representatives has passed a bill more in line with Bush's request and the two chambers will have to work out their differences.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/04/AR2006050400874.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. War good, poor and the elderly bad, rinse and repeat.
Edited on Thu May-04-06 12:05 PM by sarcasmo
Right wings new talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingyouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
3.  Senate ignores Bush veto threat
Last Updated: Friday, 5 May 2006, 15:59 GMT 16:59 UK
Senate ignores Bush veto threat

Senators added extra commitments to a bill for war funding
The US senate has ignored a warning from President George W Bush and backed an emergency spending bill which he has threatened to veto.

The Senate voted 77-21 to pass the $108.9bn bill. They had tacked about $14.4bn more spending on to the bill than Mr Bush said he would accept.

The White House repeated Mr Bush's vow to employ his veto for the first time.
(snip)

But senators have the power to add extra spending amendments, and they did so. The new commitments include $4bn in aid to farmers, $2.3bn to fight bird flu, and $2.5bn to boost security at US borders and ports.
(snip/...)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4977734.stm




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
booley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Does a VETO even matter anymore?
Couldn't Shrub just sign another "signing statement" that says he isn't obligated to follow the laws (the ones he swore he would uphold duing his inaugeration)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. 77-21, they got the votes to override
I guess bush isn't supporting the troops now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greekspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. He'll just ignore the parts he doesn't like what ever way it goes
Fucking piece of trash...33 percent of America like King George, and his monarchical rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grateful for Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Excellent statement
"But senators have the power to add extra spending amendments, and they did so. The new commitments include $4bn in aid to farmers, $2.3bn to fight bird flu, and $2.5bn to boost security at US borders and ports. "

At least our senators are showing some moxy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Why does he
hate the troops? Hate 'Murka?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. He doesn't even have to do a signing statement.
He can just not spend the money. Just because it was appropriated doesn't mean Secretary Gutierrez (or whoever) has to spend it. I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC