Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rice waives law to allow Myanmar refugees into US

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 10:51 PM
Original message
Rice waives law to allow Myanmar refugees into US
WASHINGTON (AFP) - Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has waived a law to make Myanmar refugees, almost all of whom back an armed group fighting the Yangon military junta, eligible for resettlement into the United States, the State Department said.

With the waiver, some 9,300 ethnic Karen refugees housed in Tham Hin camp in Thailand along the Myanmar border and who backed the Karen National Union (KNU) will no longer be viewed as terrorism supporters, officials said.

Under US law, people who provide material support to terrorist organizations are not eligible to immigrate into the United States.

One provision defines terrorist organization as any group of two or more people who bear arms with the intent to endanger the safety of any individual.

Yahoo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. These people really like to waive, ignore, void, table, shelve,
vacate, render moot, and otherwise invalidate duly enacted laws of the land don't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. What gives her this authority to "waive" a law
duly passed by Congress and signed by the president?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. That was my question.
The headline says: Rice waives law...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. The Immigration and Nationality Act
The government has the authority to grant a waiver, but I think this may be the first time it's been exercised. Coleman and Leahy actually proposed an amendment to the Act because Bushco's incompetence in figuring out how to grant a waiver for these particular refugees. I guess they sorted it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Thank you for the answer. Is that authority vested solely in the
Secretary of State?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. The W administration does what it wants to do
They have no respect for the rule of law. In their minds, they are the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Don't you know?
The Oath of Office is now to "faithfully ignore the laws of the United States." It's a Bush-speak, Orwellian world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One Honest Guy Donating Member (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well that's nice.
"Under US law, people who provide material support to terrorist organizations are not eligible to immigrate into the United States."

Once you understand that only applies to Muslims and communists, everything becomes clearer.

As a good friend of my says often when talking to christofascists: "Where's your enlightenment now?!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. I think Bush visited this poor country last year-wanted to instill democra
y. But why the interest? My memory is vague
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. oik
does not say how much


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myanmar#Economy

.....The United Nations lists Myanmar as a LDC3 (least developed country). Tourism is being encouraged by the government; however, fewer than 750,000 tourists enter the country yearly. Private enterprises are often co-owned or indirectly owned by the Tatmadaw. In recent years, both China and India have attempted to strengthen ties with the government because of Myanmar’s oil reserves.

Some nations, such as the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, have placed trade sanctions on Myanmar. Foreign investment comes primarily from China, Singapore and Thailand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. You found the answer to everything:
...because of Myanmar’s oil reserves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I don't know about that.
This move has a lot of bipartisan support, and it certainly isn't going to endear the administration to the government of Myanmar, or whatever the hell Burma is called this week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Whatever it is, the U.S. actions must revolve around the oil.
Will the "expatriots" of Myanmar be the new Ahmed Chalabi?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. ::sigh::
First of all, I'd like to point out that this is actually a good thing, in that these people aren't terrorists and shouldn't be barred from coming to the US.

Secondly, the Bush administration was the source of the holdup in allowing these folks into the country in the first place, and it took a bipartisan threat to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to get Condi and company off their collective asses on this issue.

Third, yes, the fact that Myanmar has huge oil and gas reserves certainly factors into the equation. But that doesn't mean this wasn't the right thing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. That the U.S. does the right thing does not mean they do it
for the right reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. With the current administration...
...I'm relieved that they've at least done the right thing instead of the most-horribly-awful-and-malicious thing imaginable.

My, how my standards have fallen. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. That's true.
You have to breathe a sigh of relief when they haven't done something terrible.

What a country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. thanks for the link rodeo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatlingforme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. Oil reserves are very popular with Bush now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
20. is there a dictionary that traanslates bush-speak into english?
"One provision defines terrorist organization as any group of two or more people who bear arms with the intent to endanger the safety of any individual."

that could include a whole lotta people/groups, some which no doubt are are connected to the iraqi contractor aparatus. i have yet to see/read any concrete definition of terrorist. one that is universally accepted. one man's terrorist could be another man's savior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
21. With what? A magic wand?. . . . . .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC