Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rove prepares 20 judges

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 12:09 AM
Original message
Rove prepares 20 judges
Presidential adviser Karl Rove and White House counsel Harriet Miers yesterday told conservative activists and Senate staff that the administration would soon send the names of more than 20 judicial nominees to Capitol Hill for confirmation.

The undertaking to move ahead came at a 2:30 meeting at the White House that was boycotted by leading conservatives upset at the slow pace of nominations, according to people who attended the meeting.

Conservatives are upset by the Senate’s slow pace on judges since the confirmation of Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court in February. They are frustrated that the White House has sent few nominees with strong conservative records.

(snip)

Rove’s participation in the meeting could mean the White House intends to emphasize the judiciary to rev up the conservative base in the run-up to the midterm election. The judiciary, because of its power over social issues, is a leading concern of the base. Rove is likely to spend more time wooing the base since he was shifted from a policy-oriented to a purely political-strategy role last month.

more…
http://www.thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/050906/news1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Social Issues concerns?
Such as?

What happened to fiscal issues?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. you need heart hitting moral issues such as Healthy Marriage Act.
flag burning, ban on gay adoption, etc Coming soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. They are out to Ban Birth Control Too.
As in "THOSE TRAMPS SHOULD GET PREGNANT FOR HAVING SEX WITH LOWLIFES"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. Would Somebody Please Indict Him?
*shadow government*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. The Dems better not bend over for these nominees. Winning
elections will be hard enough, but if all the courts are filled with these Neo-Con, Dominionist types, it won't matter what Congress does, because the courts will undo everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. What possible hope do you have that the Dems will oppose these?
Based on their record to date, what possible hope do
you have that the Dems will oppose these appointees?

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. Need to start packing them on.
There are elections to steal and justice to obstruct. The only conservative aspect will be that they swear an oath to the Republican Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. Don't call them activist judges, though.
Nooooo....Perish the thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. WHY is it acceptable for the person in charge of
political strategy to have anything to do with selecting judicial nominees? I know it has happened because the Bushies see absolutely each and every issue through the prism of political opportunism, but has this been a common practice in other administrations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
9. Rove is trying to find the "right" judge to preside over his trial n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreverdem Donating Member (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. You beat me to it
That was my first thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. it's "ram it home" time!
seems like they really know they are going to lose in november, so better get their picks in now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC