Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP: GAO Reports Military Unprepared for Storm

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 05:36 PM
Original message
AP: GAO Reports Military Unprepared for Storm
Edited on Tue May-16-06 05:37 PM by Hissyspit
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/14587702.htm

GAO reports military unprepared for storm
HOPE YEN
Associated Press
WASHINGTON - The government won't be ready for another major disaster such as Hurricane Katrina unless the Pentagon takes a more aggressive role in the federal response, congressional investigators said Monday.

Poor planning and confusion about the military's role contributed to problems after the storm struck on Aug. 29, 2005, and without immediate attention improvement is unlikely, the Government Accountability Office said.

It urged the Defense Department to establish procedures to speed aircraft, troops and reconnaissance gear to hurricane-stricken areas when local and state officials are overwhelmed as well as beef up communications support to Homeland Security officials, who have the lead role in a disaster.

"The devastation of Katrina and the issues it revealed serve as a warning that actions are needed," said the report by Congress' investigative arm. "Without urgent and detailed attention to improve planning, the military and federal government risk being unprepared."

"No one had the total picture of the forces on the ground, the forces that were on the way, the missions that had been resourced, and the missions that still need to be completed," the GAO said. "Substantial improvement will require sustained attention from the highest management levels in DoD, and across the government."

MORE



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow, just wow man.
How can they continue to get back up and run head first into that brick wall? Everyone knows why Katrina sank NOLA, Congress wouldn't eek out 23 million dollars to fix the levees, because mostly poor people lived in the area. So no one cared.

Now this gives the BFEE even more control, sounds like they want to deploy federal troops. No surprise, all our National Guard and Reserve units are fighting Bush War II. IMO, The more they sing about security, the tighter the noose around our liberties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. NOLA sank because Bush diverted over $200 million from levee construction
...to his vanity war in 2003-2004. The New Orleans Times-Picayune documented the disastrous decision very well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. What Barrett808 said!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. good line here
""Striking the appropriate balance between the military's primary warfighting role overseas and the need to support civil authorities at home is a difficult but fundamental issue," McHale said in a letter included with the report."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MetaTrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Pentagon? Isn't that the job of North Carolina mercenaries?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Here are those HEROES at $2000.00 a day.
I love the machine guns someone authorized them to carry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think about that
every since NOLA. I live in Houston and it is a real fear here as we get closer to hurricane season.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is especially troubling.
I want local National Gaurd to be tasked with this duty.
Part of the BFEE power grab may be to destroy the effectiveness of the National Guard through civilian suppression duty in Iraq.

In the Soviet Union, they detailed military from opposite ends of their nation to do "Police Duty".
Their reasoning was that military personel from far away would find it easier to shoot somebody who wasn't a friend or neighbor!



The Democratic Party is a BIG TENT, but there is NO ROOM for those
who advance the agenda of THE RICH (Corporate Owners) at the EXPENSE of LABOR and the POOR.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. They don't usually post recruits
anywhere near home here either. It takes a while before someone's able to get back to a base near their home.

Coincidence?

Maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
10. I'm not big on military assets being used like this
Personally, I think the USCG should take point on rescue operations -- they have the most training and best institutional knowledge base for it. All signficant resue operations are either on a coast or major river

As for policing actions, IMHO the national gaurd should be assigned to the Adjunct General of the State's national gaurd -- even if it requires detaching army/marines from the US Military Command temporarily.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
12. Nattering nabobs of negativity, aren't they?
Any bets on when Shrub tries to close the GAO?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC