Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pope: Low birth rates in Canada due to 'pervasive effects of secularism'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 09:35 PM
Original message
Pope: Low birth rates in Canada due to 'pervasive effects of secularism'
Edited on Sat May-20-06 09:35 PM by quaoar
http://www.canada.com/topics/news/world/story.html?id=83d60afc-ec9a-4004-a0d4-1d86ec5b6257&k=7952

VATICAN CITY (AP) - Pope Benedict said Saturday that low birth rates in Canada are the result of the "pervasive effects of secularism" and asked the country's bishops to counter the trend by preaching "with passion" the truth of Christ.

The pontiff's comments to visiting bishops from Canada echoed his statements last month to members of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, when he said that a lack of true love was behind an increase in failed marriages and a decrease in birth rates in much of the developed world.

"Like many countries . . . Canada is today suffering from the pervasive effects of secularism," Benedict said, speaking in English.

"The attempt to promote a vision of humanity apart from God's transcendent order and indifferent to Christ's beckoning light, removes from the reach of ordinary men and women the experience of genuine hope," the pope said. "One of the more dramatic symptoms of this mentality, clearly evident in your own region, is the plummeting birth rate."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Low birth rates in Canada are the result of the high cost of living.
In this over-populated world where many go hungry, I can not believe people who are concerned with "low birth rates." According to john gibson, all white people need to get together and out-breed everyone else. Make haste!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Ginny Donating Member (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Yes, we are over 6 billion.
We are destroying our planet because of our enormous needs. I never understand this low birth rate issue. It sounds like a good thing to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
74. try 6.5 bil now....
we crossed that mark a few months ago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
18. damn straight!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
65. Maybe the result of so many people becoming priests and nuns??
ROTFL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
95. It is immoral for the Pope to encourage higher birth rates
when there are millions of starving people in the world.

The Catholic Church is doing many bad things.

Preaching no condom use to prevent AIDS and discouraging birth control is evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #95
122. Not to mention Sodomy on the rectums of children
How those priests could sodomize little boys like that.

He has done nothing except to get his Lap Dogs to draft new laws,

making it harder to sue his Corrupt Abominable sex deviant priests
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kutjara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Or pehaps...
...people are finally taking a bit of responsibility for themselves and their families and not swallowing the Catholic Church's 'procreationist' dogma any more.

Another country with a falling birthrate is the Church's heartland, Italy. People seem to realise that they can have meaning in their lives that doesn't involve foisting yet more humans on an overburdened planet.

Get lost, Benedict. Your medieval views are getting annoying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suziedemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
60. Maybe St. Malachy was right and he will be the second to the last pope.
I really think the Catholic Church is becoming irrelevant, where they used to be dangerous. Ireland has been much better off since they stopped being so Catholic.

I was raised Catholic, but I look at it this way. If I wanted to lose weight, I wouldn't take advice from a company where a lot of the employees were extremely overweight. If I want to be closer to God and free from sin, I'm not going to take advice from a church were some of their best people (presumably a priest would be a better Catholic than a lay person after all that schooling) are pedophiles. When the Catholic Church can walk the walk, I'll listen to their talk.

Oh yeah, and Mother Earth called, there are already TOO MANY PEOPLE!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Or maybe the Vatican should be tracking the global rental rates of
The Passion of the Bung
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pooja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. HEADLINES: CATHOLIC CHURCH PAYS FOR PATRONAGE
Catholic Church promises to provide subsidies to Catholic parents to produce more children...Muslims convert....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatholicEdHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well, the historical tradition of big Catholic families
is to not only multiply future generations, but also have a son or two at the parents "disposal" for the priesthood. The tradition also came about because of the odds of surviving in the early church, where many kids died from natural causes/diseases before they were mature.

This is not really a religious thing, but it is a form of "revangization" of the church.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
52. allow priests to get married and have kids
if you want higher birthrates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ringo84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Buzz-word Alert
One of those buzz-words, like 'moral absolutes', 'worldview', 'new-age', etc.
Ringo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. He must be watching John Gibson on Fox News
Edited on Sat May-20-06 09:48 PM by IChing
"Now, it's time for "My Word." Do your duty. Make more babies. "

or reliving his hitler youth eugenics program
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Pope Benedict did fight for the Nazis in WWII.
That would explain his obsession with populating the world with more kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 08:48 AM
Original message
I don't think he fought for the Nazis in the literal sense
He was too young for even Germany to have sent him into battle, I believe. I believe that he was a member of the Hitler Youth, though even there you will find people who will absolve him of that membership since he was so young and was forced into membership by the times. :shrug:

I'm very anti-this Pope, and have even been accused more than once on this board of being anti-Catholic just for not liking their Pope or some of the Church's policies. But there are plenty of things to dislike about Pope Benedict without having to embellish the truth. Like, for instance, this idiotic stance on contraception when estimates are that 40-50,000 children die EVERY SINGLE DAY due to starvation, malnutrician and disease. But yes, let us all please create even more children so that they can suffer needlessly to only die by the age of 5. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
86. He NEVER fought for the Nazis.
In his memoirs, the new Pope wrote that he was enrolled in the Nazi youth movement against his will when he was 14 in 1941, when membership was compulsory. He said he was soon let out because of his studies for the priesthood.

Two years later he was drafted into a Nazi anti-aircraft unit as a helper, a common task for teenage boys too young to be soldiers. A year later he was released, only to be sent to the Austrian-Hungarian border to construct tank barriers.

He deserted the Germany army in May, 1945, and returned to Traunstein — a risky move, since deserters were shot on the spot if caught, or publicly hanged as examples to others.


www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20050419.w2newpope0419/BNStory/Front/

There are plenty of valid reasons to criticize him. I suggest you find one.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReadTomPaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #86
110. Plenty of other people found a way to avoid this or died trying.
I'd expect someone who was selected as an earthly representative of the divine not to put his own skin ahead of those who stood up and died for their principles. He should have refused to assist the worst monsters of the 20th century even if it meant his life. The previous pope found a way to do so at great risk. Ratzinger should have done the same.

He wasn't selected to run a business, he theoretically was picked because of his ability embody Catholic principles and represent 'god'. Call me old fashioned but somehow, I don't think representing god means a history that includes knuckling under for Hitler in exchange for his freedom and his life. That sounds like more like a deal with the devil. 14 is plenty old enough to understand this, especially if you believe this man touched by god for this role.

Should Jesus have cooperated with the Romans to save his own life?

YMMV
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #110
118. Well, I happen to believe that Benedict was a human being.
Not that he was "selected as an earthly representative of the divine" from infancy. Perhaps you're confusing the office of Pope with that of Dalai Lama?

I don't believe that he was "touched by God" as a 14-year-old. And I don't fault him for not rebelling & dying back then. What did YOU do at 14? Cut class & smoke in the parking lot?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReadTomPaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #118
124. Again, Should Jesus have cooperated with the Romans to save himself?
Edited on Tue May-23-06 06:56 PM by ReadTomPaine
The only confusion here is with those Catholics still in denial about the relevance of this action. Particularly in that time and era, 14 was old enough to know better, for many to know good from evil, right from wrong.

In fact, young men lied about their ages for a chance to enlist and stop Hitler. They certainly seemed to know better and there are graves all over Europe filled with their remains and those of other teenagers who were brave enough to choose good instead of evil, consequences be damned. Would you have joined the resistance, or collaborated and played it safe?

If there was ever a time to make such a choice that was it, and his decision was a dreadful mistake - a blight on his character that can never be erased or forgotten. One which clearly disqualifies him for his current position and goes against much of what the bible preaches in reaction to such circumstances. Martyrs are, after all, well regarded in Catholicism.

You seem to suggest that this past behavior on his part is irrelevant. That couldn't be more wrong. There is no better indicator of what a person will do and think than what they have done and thought in the past. A person who, even under duress, acquiesces to such evil for Faustian self preservation is simply not trustable to make such decisions in the future.

With such a record, I don't see how he can lay claim to the Papacy with any legitimacy. He should have simply removed himself from consideration, knowing his past errors in judgment were too severe to assure his future decisions would be wise. Know Thy Limitations, as it were. His failure to do this indicates his ambitions are still stronger than his conscience.

And as for your question regarding my own youth, don't point guns at messengers. Not everyone spent their teens as irresponsibly as others apparently did. I spent my youth protesting in civil rights marches, writing opinion pieces that were circulated regionally, raising money for progressive causes and spending summers knocking on doors trying to change the world one person at a time. I was confronted with violence for my beliefs on a regular basis, and many years later, I still am. That doesn't stop me, and it shouldn't stop you or anyone else.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #124
126. Perhaps Jesus should have....
Read "King Jesus" by Robert Graves for an interesting version of the life of Jesus. It's "only a novel" & would make an interesting movie. And it would be quite a media scandal.

I'm not religious, personally. But I know that the Church teaches that sins can be forgiven. Many saints of the Church were NOT "pure" from birth. Stories of perfect babies who became perfect children who became perfect adults & were taken up to Heaven by troops of angels have been out of favor for a long time.

With your blemish-free background, it is a pity you did not enter the priesthood. Obviously, YOU should be Pope.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReadTomPaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #126
128. If I were Pope...
I'd buyout Ferarri, make the ultimate Popemobile, and win F1. Then watch the new converts come pouring in.. :) I'll give Graves' book a try, love his other work.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. Look out Canada, the Theocracy freaks are coming for you NEXT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. The largest population of Catholics are Quebecers and


the ultra conservative German pope Bene-dick
registers -10 on their Give-A-Fuck-O-Meter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 04:56 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. My parents came from Canuckistan
a couple of rabid right-wingers. They left Canada because it was too liberal.

Fortunately, all they did was produce a crop of Liberals..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #20
54. 'produce a crop of liberals'
my laugh for the day...hehe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. ten of us and only one goes to church.
Edited on Sun May-21-06 02:57 PM by formercia
That's what happens when you try and ram it down our throats.

A sister goes to church. She became a Mormon. I don't know if that counts....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeveredMind Donating Member (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #20
70. I just had a mental image of...
...your parents shaking their heads in dismay as several blue-colored children started to grow out of the ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. Thanks, but, no thanks. Why does that Hitler's Youth member...
wants to interfere with internal immigration policies of a free nation?

Could it be that he finds our "donation$" not sufficient anymore? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. Man I really despise Benedict
Falling birth rates?? Can't have that...less victims for priests who wanna play doctor and less people to send on the New Crusades

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPNotForMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. Oh, SHUT UP, POPE! You are irrelevant.
Completely and utterly useless. A feckless ossified out-of-touch antique from an era to which no sane person wants to return. Your views are as idiotic as your clothes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewenotdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. nicely put
I couldn't agree more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. Make More CHILDREN... We Need More CHILDREN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
45. Oh, the irony
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #45
83. The Whole Thing Creeps Me Out.
:heebie-jeebies:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. Wait a sec... where is the sale? Of the church's possessions
of course. Of its huge property, so that people will be able to provide for their families the basic necessities, and more, and then retire in dignity.

As Earl Butz said some 30 years ago: play or shut up (in more colorful words).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
113. They 're going to need that property
for the court settlements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKthatsIT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 03:22 AM
Response to Original message
19. Nahhh..its Depleted Uranium side effects, silly!
Shiiiiiit, the Pope thinks he knows everything, dont he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
21. If this wasn't so ridiculous, it'd be laughable
.
.
.

As one poster indicated, the high cost of living is a major consideration.

We have huge heating costs due to our climate.

You don't see too many large houses 100 miles north of our border, except for "cottages" of the well-to do.

We just can't afford to HEAT a large house/mansion.

And jobs up North just do not pay as well as those in our major cities - where, of course the rent/cost is much higher than up North.

Canada is 9.9 million square kilometres, slightly larger than the USA's 9.6 million square kilometers

We got 31 million people, the USA has 298 million

And we sell numerous resources to the USA, our wood, steel, petroleum products and food products.

So "WHO NEEDS who??"

We be fine keeping our population low -

We can be self sufficient if our governments don't continue prostituting our resources to the USA.

And despite some people's misconceptions,

We spend less of our GNP per capita on Health-care (which is universal) than the USA does with all their uncoordinated HMO's, and STILL have 43 million of their people with no Health Coverage.

SO

Mr. POPE

Concentrate on getting the pedophiles out of your "organization!!

SHEESH!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
22. Pope Ratzy wants us to breed like lemmings and then starve
to death because the planet can't support us. Suggestion to Ratzy: liquidate some of your art and feed the dying children of Africa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #22
109. Remember the dark ages? It worked out quite well for the church.
A desperate, ignorant population with only one source of warm fuzzies and the promise of paradise is a fine combination. Africa would be a good addition...

Somewhere in there, Christ said some magnificent things. Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hyphenate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
23. What a load
of utter bullshit.

Canada is smarter than most countries and is maintaining a stable population, while still having a good amount of space in which to expand, if necessary. Intelligent and socially conscious people don't breed like rabbits.

The world is overpopulated enough without adding to the strain we are already placing on natural resources and nonrenewable ones. What--does the idiot Benedict want to see 10 or more kids in every family again? What an obnoxious asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #23
76. and our population IS increasing -- but primarily through immigration
Edited on Sun May-21-06 08:47 PM by Lisa
Francophones from all over the world are choosing to settle in Quebec. The vast majority of Quebecois whom I've met, even if their ancestors arrived in the 1600s, have no problem with this .. they like having a vibrant cosmopolitan society. Our current Governor-General is from Haiti, and she adopted a child from an orphanage in her former hometown. If the Pope does not like the concept of Canada's getting new citizens from other countries rather than relying mainly on our birth rate ... he ought to have brought the matter up with her when she visited him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
24. And there's more
:spank:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Quick! Let's send John Gibson to Canada!
That way, he can help Canada make more babies and he'll be out of Americans' hair!

He's pale, rested and ready!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
26. Canada doesn't seem to be suffering...
...nearly as much as the Pope does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pschoeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
27. Uhm, the Vatican has a near zero birth rate
And the Catholic church promotes encoureging people to live celibate childeless lives as nuns and priests, isn't this the most silliest form of hypocricy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
28. Let's hear it for secularism then. We don't need more babies than we
already can't feed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #28
38. With you all the way.
Thanks for pointing out a rare success story in a world hurtling toward its own demise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
primavera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #38
102. Second that
Individual humans are great, but, let's face it, as a species, our collective impact on the rest of the planet leaves a lot to be desired - the last thing the world needs is still more of us running around cutting down forests, draining wetlands, tearing up the earth with mines and wells, polluting the air with toxic emissions, poisoning the oceans, and, oh yeah, altering the climate of the entire planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
29. I love it, absolutely love it....
"Canada is today suffering from the pervasive effects of secularism". Yep, and those pervasive effects are why Canada is as successful as it is. Religion isn't part of the policy decision-making, the well-being of Canadians is the focus. Even the right-wing minority government temporarily in power knows not to try and use religion as the formation of policy. They know if they push it they will lose, without question, the next election.

The pope can go stuff himself, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #29
92. I wish I...
could suffer from the pervasive effects of secularism. :hi:Spazito. Ya'll sound like my kinda people.:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #92
97. Hey AnneD! I tell ya pervasive secularism is awesome!
It means decisions are made on what is most beneficial to Canadians instead of what is most beneficial for the coffers of any religious organization. It means people of faith practice it privately instead of using it as a political hammer to restrict the rights of others.

We do, however, have a very small but vocal minority who would very much like Canada to mirror the religious right in the U.S. and we have to keep our antennae up for sure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #97
98. Don't ever let your guard down...
and remember the USA as a cautionary tale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #98
101. Canadians are watching what is happening in the US with
an equal amount of increasing sadness and wariness. Pierre Elliot Trudeau remarked that Canada’s relationship with the United States is like that of “a mouse in bed with an elephant…no matter how friendly…one is affected by every twitch and grunt.”

Trudeau was correct and we Canadians need to safeguard that which we hold dear.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #29
119. posted in wrong place, n/t
Edited on Tue May-23-06 02:57 PM by iverglas

how did I manage that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
30. "Low birth rates in Canada"
If Pope Ratzo would just start caring about the people already here on Earth instead of worrying about alleged low birthrates....Various countries have poverty, low/no access to healthcare, & there should be more stem cell research to help those already here; try doing something about that, Ratzo. :eyes:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
31. "suffering from the pervasive effects of secularism"
:rofl:

Get used to it Pope. It's what an educated population does. We have more than enough people in the world. It's time to move beyond the shackles of organized religion including the RCC's absurd concepts of sin. Unfortunately Mexico is still listening to the Catholic Church when it comes to contraception. This has to change if we want to solve the illegal immigration problem. This along with the implementation of fair trade policies and other economic improvements for Mexico.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
32. Benedict is Intolerant and a bigot.
Edited on Sun May-21-06 10:53 AM by AX10
i.e: "suffering from the pervasive effects of secularism"

So secularists are "perverted" now? :eyes:

Secularism is has good and bad just as all religions do Benedict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canadian Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. I'm not sure I understand what you're saying here
"pervasive" doesn't mean perverted. He means that secularism is everywhere in Canada. Which is a good thing, imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JudyM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
34. So implying that overpopulation's ravages to the earth are due to religion
I would not disagree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #34
64. so basically, he should endorse polygamy if he wants scads of
potential parishioners. On CNN the other night, a disenfranchised polygamist grandpa and grandma were mourning not being able to see their 120 grandchildren. chew on that image for a moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JudyM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #64
82. I'll get flamed for this, but I think there should be limits on the number
of kids a person should be able to have. Not claiming to know what that number is, and I know we can't enforce zero population growth, but if a couple has more than 10 kids, say ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
35. The German Pope wishes he had the power of the Borgia Popes
Thankfully, we have come a long ways from ancient beliefs in blood-thirsty gods demanding obedience and sacrifices.

Benedict's hoped-for-world is one in which women are mere baby factories, gays are send to the brausbad/crematoria, and the Church is the supreme arbiter of human affairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #35
85. Can always depend on I.G. for the liveliest verbiage in the thread
:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #35
87. I'm afraid we haven't come as far as you think
Or if we did advance that far, we are very rapidly regressing to Ye Days of Olde.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
36. Why doesn't he mind his own business.
Italy has a lower birthrate than Canada. He should just shut up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #36
89. I believe I've seen a report showing that all the
industrialized/Western/1st world nations ahve zero to negative birth rates, and that the populations of those countries are only increasing due to immigration. Most of Europe and even the US should apparently be criticized by the Pope as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiraboo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
37. Nothing turns me on so much as somebody preaching to me
with passion the truth of Christ. You?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
retrospective66 Donating Member (168 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
39. Be Fruitful and Multiply
Eye-Yie-Yie :eyes: ..... I think we already have. Now we've got to chill.

Much of this is demographic. Canada went through a baby boom around the same years we did. Now like ours, their population is aging. Of course there will be less children as women move beyond the years they can or want to have babies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. Thank you for your logical perspective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheWhoMustBeObeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
40. Hope is a vastly overrated and deeply abused commodity
When ordinary men and women have more control over their own destinies, those who wish to keep their hands on the reins call it by dirty names. The corporations call it socialism. The Church calls it secularism.

When ordinary men and women have more control over their own destinies, they don't need hope. They have power.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Love that line-may I use it?
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheWhoMustBeObeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. Be my guest
Glad you enjoyed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #46
99. Thank you-I appreciate it! Please check out my new sig line!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheWhoMustBeObeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #99
116. Wow, cool!
I've been quoted! Thank you! :D :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LongTomH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
41. Canada 41, Pope 0
Replies, that i!

:headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang:

Battin at thousand, aren't you Bennie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
42. Maybe I missed it
I mean, the part where Jesus talked about the evils of birth control? And the requirement for women to bear zillions of children?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #42
90. And if it really is so important
that people have offsrping, why is it so scandalous to allege that Jesus may have had some kiddos himself? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #90
104. Yup, and of course, priests must be male and celibate... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #42
111. He discussed in in the famous Sermon on the Pill
A scribe mis-copied this as the Sermon on the Hill, and later translations labeled it the Sermon on the Mount.


Seriously though, I wish the Pope would take his stance from Christian scriptures and not from strictures against birth control left over from a time when the Roman Empire was trying to expand its pool of native born soldiers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
47. Hah.. Those women of old were going to church all the time
Edited on Sun May-21-06 01:52 PM by SoCalDem
to pray that they were NOT pregnant again for the unmpteenth time..

When people have fewer children, they can actually have a life BEYOND changing diapers, nursing babies, and going to church..THAT'S what bugs the catholic church.

It always bothers me when the Vatican urges people to have huge families, but I don't see them helping financially.

People are not living on farms anymore...they don't need to grow their onwn farmhands these days..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
48. pervasive effects of secularism? Are priests secular? Allow priests to
marry or shut up! Make it mandatory the white priests have no less then ten kids. :sarcasm: Sig Heil Pope Nazi!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exiled in America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
49. Six billion miracles are enough. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
50. Birthrate determines hope? That's a new one.
So, when I and my wife decided to have only one kid, that means we lost all hope?

And we know many couples who are childless and not even interested in adopting. Does that mean they're living in absolute despair?

That must also mean that celibate priests and nuns never had a chance for hope.

Papa Ratzi must have a radically different concept of the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
51. Low birth rates are because
Edited on Sun May-21-06 02:20 PM by TheFarseer
no one can afford to have more than a couple kids. Actually, I think there is an over-population problem. How else do you explain all the famine, refugees, polution, destruction of animal habitat and disease in the world?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
53. What is this worry about low birthrates?
For pete's sake the world is being taken over by human beasts to the exclusion of flora and fauna. It isn't as though the human race is going to die out any time soon. The Chinese have the sense to realize that too many people are just too many people.
What really doesn't make sense is that some dried up old bachelor in Italy can be a Decider about how other people are going to conduct their lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
55. Okay, the Pope is telling Canada to spend more time fucking?
What's wrong with that. They might get more converts if they start pushing that.

You could have fun with memes on this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buns_of_Fire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #55
103. Amen! Screw for Jesus! Hallelujah!
Pretty soon, the 700 Club will have to be carried on the Playboy Channel with parental warnings. Rev. Moon will not only conduct mass marriages, he'll preside over thousands fornicating in the streets like rabid weasels. The pretzeldent will no longer give out medals of freedom, he'll give out "Golden Bunny" awards to couples who have... well... most successfully made like bunnies.

THIS... could be interesting! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
57. Sruggling to find a down side to secularism or Canada's low birth rate
Can anyone help me out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #57
77. I suppose we might have to re-organize our tax system
Edited on Sun May-21-06 08:54 PM by Lisa
Once the baby boomers start retiring, we'll have to figure out how to pay for pensions and medical care if the proportion of workers dwindles, relative to retirees ... but this is something which all industrialized countries (including non-Western ones like Japan) will have to cope with, this century. And there will probably be some shifts in things like education (not as many primary schools, and more continuing education and postgraduate schools). But these aren't really "down sides", especially in terms of things like pressure on the environment.

When one considers the types of problems faced by developing countries like Afghanistan, where most of the population is under 18 and there isn't enough money to pay for schools and prenatal care, so there's high infant mortality -- Canada's future really doesn't seem to be as difficult.

Here are some interesting animated population pyramids showing projected changes.

http://www.statcan.ca/english/kits/animat/pyone.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
58. Ah Hah!... I figured it out: Fewer births means fewer new alter boys
Conflict of interest rears its ugly head yet again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #58
73. lol(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
59. You know I get a little sick and tired of
this pope yakking about women having more and more babies when he and the priests don't even marry, know squat about raising children, and should be spending lots more time tracking what their pedophiles are up to. Maybe if the priests could marry, they wouldn't look like such hypocrites.

I'll never forget when the last pope went to Mexico and told all of the poor women to have more and more babies because the church needed priests.

Catholism gets on my nerves....not Catholics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
61. Low birth rates are a good thing
:applause: I'm sorry but there are way too many people in this world. I am not anti-people; The less people there are, the better the quality of life there can be for the ones who are here. It's just that simple. The pie (Earth's resources) can only be cut into so many pieces before those pieces get too small for everyone and everyone starts fighting over them. I'm always glad to read stories like these. This reaction by the pope and fundies to this kind of news is nothing but bigotry, IMO. They're worried that western Christians will be outnumbered. :eyes: I remember having this conversation years ago with a conservative Catholic. He was very worried but I told him I didn't see the problem. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
62. what an unfortunate word choice
I don't have a good feeling about priests creating more babies by preaching "with passion."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
63. men in dresses who don't have sex (maybe) commenting on this
topic make me laugh out loud. Besides, didn't they pass a bull a few back that said even sex to procreate was wrong? I remember it. It was so medieval and pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kitty1 Donating Member (772 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
66. As a Canadian with two sons, I can tell you.....
that lack of hope or sprituality had nothing to do with our decision to have only two children. For practical reasons, we decided that two was the perfect number of kids for us. We were able to put more time and resources into both of them. Life has been very full and fulfilling with my boys. (Both 17 and 15 now) I can honestly say that for me personally, having 4 or 5 children would have been difficult to cope with. A lot more stress with balancing everything in life overall. My Irish immigrant grandmother on the other hand had 9 kids,and they were raised on a farm. I have to give her credit for managing that. A whole different kind of life back then though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #66
78. big families make more sense in an agricultural economy ...

I'm Canadian too -- my parents both came from large immigrant families (not unusual for Protestants either). This was in the pre-war days when most people were farming or fishing, and needed extra hands around the place. Plus, as my folks keep reminding me, there was no medicare or old-age pension in "the good old days" (both families lost kids due to illnesses/accidents so there was that to consider as well).

None of my parents' siblings had more than 3 kids each, and among my many cousins, many of us put off having children until our 30s, had just 1 or 2, or didn't have any at all. My dad is a retired teacher, and says that he doesn't mind if he has no biological grandchildren, because helping build a stable peaceful society (through his work, and his tax dollars) is also a type of legacy.

As you say, things were different back then -- Canada has changed a lot since my parents were my age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #78
112. As my Mom always said to me (Only Child),
your right to NOT be a Mother, trumps my "right" to be a Grandmother. Very forward thinking for a Catholic Italian woman born in 1920. It is the individual's choice.

I agree with her. I have two children (daughters) by choice and have quoted my Mom many times to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
67. Another EXCELLENT example of why religion & science
do not mix.

This guy is really becoming an embarrassment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
69. family planning == good ...means people can feed and care for
children they have...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackDragna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
71. Thank God for the pervasive effects of secularism.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
72. GOOD... We Have OVERPOPULATION on this Planet
that is by the way being destroyed, hence GLOBAL WARMING!!!!! Jeez...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudestchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
75. My next door "squatters" are members of that particular fertility cult.
They have 5 children under the age of 13 and she's pregnant w/ #6. They've moved in with her mother...all of them. She home-schools...to protect her children from "ungodly influences" I think she means science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
79. does he want to roll back "The Quiet Revolution"?

A lot of people in Quebec have negative impressions of the way things used to be ... when the church ran everything and told people what to do (and also the anglos were the bosses and professionals with the best jobs, but the church did nothing to change that).



"Since the first days of New France, the Catholic Church had assumed the task of educating the young. In the early 1960s, the system - and the curriculum - were archaic, obsolete and produced one of the highest dropout rates in the country; half of all Quebec students were leaving school by the age of fifteen.

Those who wanted a higher education found a system designed for a few chosen souls.

"Our mission was to train the elite," said Claude Brouillet who taught at a classical college near Montreal. "We had some sons of working-class people. To be able to get (financial) help, they had to have a recommendation from the parish priest.""




http://history.cbc.ca/history/?MIval=EpisContent.html&series_id=1&episode_id=16&chapter_id=1&page_id=1&lang=E
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
80. Shame on us. Standard of living has been rising since the advent of
the birth control pill and the like. How dare we have the option of investing in children by investing in them.. rather than going for numbers of children.. like the poor everywhere have always had to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
81. Canada is barely supporting its infrastructure now
What we need right now is skilled workers for the oil patch (and pretty much any other occupation). Babies are not going to help right now - they'll just be a strain on the infrastructure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #81
91. That might be a very good thing for people like me
and many members of my family who would very happily move to secularist Canada. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #91
125. C'mon up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
84. someone really needs to tell him to shut the f*** up
Edited on Mon May-22-06 02:15 AM by Skittles
I can't believe people actually revere this silly old man
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #84
88. Why don't you let people make up their minds...
About what he says?

Quite a few who consider themselves good Catholics are quite capable of making their own decisions about what Church doctrines to follow.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #88
105. cherry picking
Edited on Mon May-22-06 02:33 PM by Skittles
I wish more people would say, hey, this other stuff, not only do I not like this, it is UNACCEPTABLE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #88
121. what a very odd thing to say
Why don't you let people make up their minds...
About what he says?


Was the person you were addressing stopping anyone from making up his/her own mind?

The Pope is expressing his opinion, and you say that RCers are capable of making their own decisions about what RC church doctrines to follow.

Quite apart from the fact that this is a bizarrely simplistic approach to take to pronouncements by the pope -- and particularly US/Euro-centric, ignoring many places in the world where papal pronouncements are given considerably more weight both in the public sphere and in individual's minds, as a result of a variety of factors -- the person you were addressing was also expressing an opinion.

The pope's remarks about who knows how many millions of individuals whom he does not know, and about Canadians in particular, were grossly offensive. That's my opinion, and I'll express my own opinion that someone who makes grossly offensive remarks about me and anyone else about whom he has no business saying anything at all should shut the fuck up whenever I want, too. You can feel free to express your opinion about what I say, but of course.

You might want to suggest that the pope should let people make up their own minds. He seems to be the one trying to get people to do as he says, and being dishonest and ugly for that purpose.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
93. Yo, Pope Ratzorizzo - have some more koolaid, ya looney!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
94. Ratzi, when you have been married with children for as long as I have
I will start paying attention to your ideas about how I should live.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
96. Is the Pope sett'g quotas. Maybe he should pray 4 warmer weather up there
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
100. The pope doesn't understand basic socioeconomics.
When incomes and living standards increase birth rate goes down.

It has nothing to do with secularism.

The Pope is practicing faith based socioeconomic analysis.

In other words he doesn't know wtf he is talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
106. LOL and the Vatican is procreation central of Europe? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wrinkle_In_Time Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
107. Where have I heard that phrase before?
Oh yes, it was the shared motivation of both Leo Strauss and Sayed Kotb with respect to the U.S.A. in the 1950s. This drove them to form the Neo-Conservative and Radical Islamist Fundamentalist movements, respectively.

That's now working out really well for the planet, isn't it?

Obersturmunddrangfuhrer Joey Ratz can kiss my secular freckle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buck Rabbit Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
108. How many kids did Jesus father? /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
114. And Jebus had ...how many kids?
fuck a buncha popes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
115. Does anybody care what the pope (any pope) says anymore?
I can remember back in the 50s and 60s, when the Pope issued an edict it was a big deal. Friends would obsessively follow all the rituals like abstaining from meat on Fridays, no birth control, etc. I don't see that sort of earnest participation anymore.

I think the pope is pretty much irrelevant to most people today, even many Catholics.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
117. Why do I suspect this is code for
European style caucasians to kick up production. He must realize that the population of the world is already too high. Canada could take in lots of willing immigrants from African and Asian countries if we really need more people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
120. he's probably right

The RC church helped to keep the population of Quebec impoverished and benighted for decades, in large part through its demand that women spend their lives producing more and more children. Came the Quiet Revolution and the various other complex economic and social changes of the mid-late 20th century, and with it a dramatic drop in birth rates. Just like anywhere else: development and smaller families go hand in hand, as do underdevelopment and large families.

Most Quebeckers self-identify at present as RC, but that has very little effect on their lives. Quebec has the highest rate of non-married couples living in conjugal relationships, including couples with children, of any province, as one indicator of how much of a fig they give about what Pope whateverhisnameis has to say.

Overall, nearly 20% of Canadians reported having "no religion" in the 2001 census, nearly double the 1991 figure. This is a truly excellent thing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
123. So, the Catholic church wants there to be more children....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
127. It's too bad every country doesn't have "low birth rates".
"Low birth rates" are a good thing, imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC