Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Laborers' Union Breaks Free From AFL-CIO

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 03:23 PM
Original message
Laborers' Union Breaks Free From AFL-CIO
WASHINGTON - The Laborers' Union, which represents 700,000 workers in the construction industry, has decided to leave the AFL-CIO, officials said.

The Laborers were already part of the Change to Win coalition, breakaway unions that have left the giant federation of more than 50 unions in an effort to forge a new direction for organized labor. But the Laborers had remained in the federation.

"We are leaving so that we can place our full efforts and focus on growth in order to help millions of construction workers improve their lives," said Richard Greer, a spokesman for the Laborers. The Laborers informed the AFL-CIO Monday that they are leaving as of June 1.

The Laborers, the Service Employees International Union, the Teamsters, the United Food and Commercial Workers, UNITE HERE, United Farm Workers and the Carpenters are part of the Change to Win coalition.

more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060522/ap_on_bi_ge/labor_rift
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Which includes backing Republican candidates
Ouch.....

It is a double edged sword.

The division came long before the immigration debate began heating up and it was over being able to support Republican candidates. SEIU and the Carpenter's Union led the charge and no others are joining in. A majority of labor feels Democrats are merely taking their money and voting against their interest.

But yes the Labor's and SEIU are both pro-immigration and hope to gain membership
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Which Republican candidates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Strategic Organizing Center
The central objective of the Change to Win Strategic Organizing Center is to unite the more than 50 million American workers who work in industries that cannot be outsourced or shipped overseas into strong unions that can win them a place in the American middle class — where their jobs provide good wages, good health care, good pensions and a voice on the job.

Change to Win’s Strategic Organizing Center (SOC) develops and implements organizing campaigns to unite workers in these jobs to win better wages, benefits and working conditions — and to turn these jobs into good union jobs. The Strategic Organizing Center is a hub where Change to Win unions come together to integrate their organizing programs and to launch large scale organizing campaigns.

There was a time when blue-collar jobs in the auto, steel, electrical, rubber and other manufacturing industries were considered low wage jobs. Through union organization, these “low wage jobs” became “good paying jobs, with good benefits” that led to the creation of America’s middle class and defined the elements of the American Dream. Millions of those manufacturing jobs have been eliminated or shipped overseas in recent years.

Jobs in today’s growing service sector are the “low wage” jobs of today. Whether it is caring for the sick, attending to hotel guests, or transporting goods across the country, these jobs cannot be outsourced to foreign lands. They are critically important to the economy and to the quality of life in this country. And nowhere is it written that these jobs must be low wage-low benefit jobs. In fact, the wages and benefits of service workers that are represented by a union today are substantially higher than those that are not ...

http://www.changetowin.org/organizing.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Which Republican candidates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I didn't say anything about Republican candidates.
I really think the issue has always been organizing ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. SEIU endorsed Pataki in 2002
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Thank you for answering my question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. SEIU backed a Republican for Miami Beach Commissioner last year
He almost won, which would have made him the first GOP Commissioner in that city in over 20 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Local races are endorsed at the local level, usually.
Local endorsement decisions are usually made by the local organizations or maybe at state level. National endorsements are usually made at the international level. In recent years the endorsements are not always a slam dunk for Dems, and frankly, in local races it probably should be decided based on the candidates' history with organized labor rather than on the party affiliation.

I've seen it locally that some of the Dems have been terrible on Labor issues. In a case like that, Labor and its members are better served to not blindly endorse based on party--don't you agree? Seems to me, that if the Unions are interested in serving the membership, they have an obligation to look long and hard at who they contribute to and who they endorse.

I'm not at all informed about that Miami Beach Commissioner's race, and as a result I am not able to offer much opinion about that particular endorsement. However, I am wondering about the personalities involved given what I know about the current environment for Labor...


Laura
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
INdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. You are correct
The Carpenters union international President influenced the break because he was about to be indicted for insider trading (among other things)He sucked up to Bush and all of a sudden nothing more was heard about his criminal activity..The Carpenters pension is being siphoned away but no never mind as far the Republican administration goes.."just give us the money" and that's the way it is..
These leaders make Jimmy Hoffa look like a saint......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Are they "pro-immigration" or pro-illegal immigration?
There is a big difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC