Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FCC chief says won't probe NSA call program

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 01:09 PM
Original message
FCC chief says won't probe NSA call program
WASHINGTON, May 23 (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Communications Commission will not pursue complaints about a spy agency's access to millions of telephone records because it cannot obtain classified material, the FCC's chairman said in a letter released on Tuesday.

Rep. Edward Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat, had asked communications regulators to investigate a newspaper report that AT&T Inc. , Verizon Communications and BellSouth Corp. gave access to and turned over call records to help the National Security Agency fight terrorists.

"The classified nature of the NSA's activities makes us unable to investigate the alleged violations," FCC Chairman Kevin Martin said in the May 22 letter to Markey.

. . .

The five-member FCC oversees and regulates U.S. telecommunications. While technically independent, the commissioners are appointed by the president with no more than three from the political party controlling the White House. Martin, a Republican designated chairman last year, worked at the White House and for President George W. Bush's 2000 presidential campaign before joining the FCC in 2001 as a commissioner.

Section 222 of the 1934 Communications Act requires telecommunications carriers to protect the confidentiality of certain consumer call information, "except as required by law" or when the customer approves its release. Violators can be fined.

http://today.reuters.com/investing/financeArticle.aspx?type=governmentFilingsNews&storyID=2006-05-23T175222Z_01_N23187803_RTRIDST_0_SECURITY-TELECOMS-FCC.XML
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
indypaul Donating Member (896 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. I am shocked, shocked. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yea, me too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. And the fascists all fall into line...
Sad... :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. "It's true. This man has no dick." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. I say the word "Fuck" all the time on my cellphone...
If The NSA is, wiretaping, recording and re-broadcasting me saying the word "Fuck," then isn't The NSA guilty of broadcasting obscenity?

Maybe that's how to get 'em! They say naughty words!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashdebadge Donating Member (235 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
26. I don't think they hear you. From what i've read
the NSA was given phone records not recordings. I've never tried listening to my phone bill, but logic tells me that I wouldn't hear anything. Look, I'm totally against the phone company's giving our records to the NSA, which by the way I believe they did and are lying about it. But, making the leap from phone records to listening in on phone calls is a leap that my research has yet to reveal. Can you show me yours?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. Because if they do, all sorts of interesting information gleaned
from the monitoring of their phones will be revealed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. State Secrets trump democracy every time. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. can i get a copy of your graphic?
i want it to be my sig line graphic too.....

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Sure!
Tulsakatz made it a week or so ago and very kindly let me use it. Go ahead and grab a copy for yourself. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 05:38 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. thank you ! and thanks to Tulsakatz!
:hi:

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. The Nature of a Secret Police
http://www.answers.com/topic/secret-police

Enforcement of the law has required, in nearly all societies, a certain amount of secrecy, particularly in the investigation of crime and the identification of what are often considered conspiracies. The emergence of a uniformed, clearly recognizable police force is of much more recent origin than secret bodies formed by governments for their protection from internal and external attack. In its wider meaning, the term secret police embraces all those members of any police force that operate, often out of uniform, without giving warning to the suspected criminal. Some countries have laws limiting the role of such secret police to investigation only, giving the indicted offender the right to an open trial and complete access to the evidence.

Wherever these interrelated conditions are not fulfilled, a secret police in the narrower sense of the term either exists or is in process of developing. This secret police is a body officially or in fact endowed with authority superior to other law-enforcing agencies. It investigates, apprehends, and sometimes even judges the suspect in secrecy, and is often accountable only to the executive branch of the government. In extreme cases such a secret police force may even have its own courts and prisons, and its activities are kept secret not only from the mass of the population but also from the legislative, judiciary, and executive authorities of the state, except at the topmost level.

...more...

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. "Rep. Edward Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat," ?!?!
Why is the fact that he's a Massachusetts Democrat relevant? Did anyone else notice this? What bu$h-supporting jockstrap mediawhore wrote this crap? Does anyone notice how these cretinous "journalists" put "Democrat" in the first or second paragraph of anything they write? Do they delineate Republicans in the same way? Nope. They refer to Repubs as "lawmakers" or "representatives". How telling. Daily KOS had something about this today and so now I've begun to notice this shiite. It's quite insidious.

As regards the rest of this -- in other words, the bu$hit admin refuses to allow any investigation into the culling of telephone subscribers personal data. That's what it comes down to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. chill .. this particular reporter uses that style for both parties
Here's a story he wrote a couple of months ago:


"With new competitors preparing to enter the ongoing race between cable and satellite, the law needs to change," said House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Rep. Joe Barton, a Texas Republican.

Telephone carriers have been pressing to get into the video business as the cable companies have been encroaching on the telephone and high-speed, broadband Internet service business.

The measure was also sponsored by Michigan Republican Rep. Fred Upton and Rep. Bobby Rush, an Illinois Democrat."


http://sg.news.yahoo.com/060328/3/3zooi.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Another thing to notice is that if the consultant from a RW firm
is being quoted, they never mention it is RW. AEI is introduced just as a prominant think tank. But anyone who is not RW is automatically introduced as a liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. FCC won't investigate because the NSA program is s-e-c-r-e-t.
And because it's s-e-c-r-e-t we're not supposed to know about it.

What a relief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. pretzel logic. it's beyond catch-22... it's a brave new world.
we could see this coming years ago, and it's finally caught up with us. we have an organization, something that ultimately is designed to protect us, which has run amok and nobody and nothing can stop it. it's above examination, above reproach, above the Constitution, above oversight... and it's unAmerican as all hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. Um is there any question left in anyone's mind
on whether or not the NSA is the true "shadow government" that conspiracy kooks have talked about for years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
15. AAAAAH!


Dicks! They're all dicks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. fucking fascists!!!
Edited on Tue May-23-06 03:59 PM by Az_lefty
how many times are they going to get away with this shit?
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. If it's legal for the NSA to tap this information,
Edited on Tue May-23-06 05:07 PM by SimpleTrend
then why is it illegal for me to record all my own phone calls without advising the other party with the 15-second "beep -- beep -- beep" audible alert running?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evil Bush Donating Member (44 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
19. And the fox will not be investigating the henhouse incident, either
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
20. and the Justice Dept earlier said that they were not cleared either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
21. Sorry. No Boobies - No Investigation
That's pretty much how it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
24. This is fucking ridiculous
Edited on Wed May-24-06 07:29 AM by Mr_Spock
This is so so so wrong.

Apparently we have the fox watching the hen house :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ragin_mad Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
25. Here is an interesting question
"Section 222 of the 1934 Communications Act requires telecommunications carriers to protect the confidentiality of certain consumer call information"


Exactly what information is required to remain confidential ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timber84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
27. I'm ashamed the FCC chief went to my High School
Sorry DU I hang my head in shame!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. Hey, don't feel bad....
Sen. George Allen, (R-racist-VA) was in my HS graduating class. I feel your pain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian_rd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
28. Gov: "Enron, we are confiscating your records to prosecute you."
Enron: "You can't have them! Nya nya!"

Gov: "Ok, case closed."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
29. FCC chair Martin is just one of many Bush cronies
Edited on Wed May-24-06 08:27 AM by katinmn
Repugs' strategy to put a crony (not an expert) in every single agency is paying off handsomely.

Martin, a Republican designated chairman last year, worked at the White House and for President George W. Bush's 2000 presidential campaign before joining the FCC in 2001 as a commissioner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #29
33. to be fair, that's an incomplete picture of Martin's background
Don't get me wrong. Martin is very well connected -- he worked on chimpy's legal team in Florida after the 2000 election and his wife works for Cheney. And I think he's been a disaster as FCC Chairman, but not because he's an unqualified "crony." Unlike Brownie and some others, Martin does have the proper credentials. He was an communications attorney at a major DC firm and served as a legal assistant to an FCC Commissioner in the late 90s. In many respects, he has better "qualifications" than any number of previous FCC Commissioners (or even current ones -- you can make the case that he has a better resume for the job than either of the Democratic Commissioners, who came from the Hill and were not significant players in the communications policy arena prior to their appointment). My problem with him is with his policy decisions, which reflect his ideology as much as his connections.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suegeo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
30. ALL Republicans are flaming assholes
In addition to being a flaming asshole, Kevin seems like he also cannot find his ass with both hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
32. I would use the word "Surreal" but I must either be succumbing to this
or just numb to it at this point.

Simply amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. it's as if they have tied their own hands and would rather no struggle to
get loose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IceOwl Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
34. Not surprising...
If you ask the Mafia to expose their ranks, do you think they'll just do it?

I think if the government doesn't want to obey the law, then it's time for citizens to uphold it, by breaking the laws that protect the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canichelouis Donating Member (357 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
35. I wonder where Michael Powell is in all of this
and how he would be reacting now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
37. This is bull, but par for the course
More reason to get excited about a Democratic victory this fall - it's the only way some accountability might come out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC