Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Leaders Profess Less Outrage on FBI Raid

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 07:36 PM
Original message
Senate Leaders Profess Less Outrage on FBI Raid
After a week of bipartisan outrage over an FBI raid on a congressman's office, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist weighed in yesterday, saying that he was "okay" with the search and saw no constitutional problems with it......

Frist (R-Tenn.) said on "Fox News Sunday" that he had studied the provision in the Constitution regarding the separation of powers, and consulted with Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales. He concluded that the FBI acted appropriately when it used a warrant to search the office of a sitting lawmaker for the first time in history.
...
Sen. Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.), assistant minority leader, also took a measured view of the raid, questioning whether the "speech and debate" protections in the Constitution were violated, as critics say. "I'm not sure you can stretch it to apply to this situation," he said. He noted that the action was not without precedent. He said that the FBI has raided the office of a federal judge before, so there is a history of branches of government crossing each other with regard to a search warrant. "In the next several weeks, we ought to take a hard look at it. I'm not going to rule it in or out at this moment."

House Judiciary Committee Chairman F. James Sensenbrenner Jr. (R-Wis.), who called a hearing tomorrow on the constitutionality of the search, said yesterday that the FBI overreached.

"This debate is not over whether Congressman Jefferson is guilty of a criminal offense," Sensenbrenner said on NBC's "Meet the Press." "He cannot use the constitutional immunity of Congress to shield himself from that or any evidence of that. But it is about the ability of the Congress to be able to do its job free of coercion from the executive branch."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/28/AR2006052800741.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. What can we expect from people that voted to confirm Gen. Hayden?
Historians will say that George Bush had a lot of bipartisan help when he proceeded to install himself as dictator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Durbin voted against Hayden
But too many Ds didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CdnObserver Donating Member (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. This should suppress any impeachment thoughts from rogue house GOP's

This should do nicely for them to make sure that Republicans in Congress don't get the idea that they can save themselves by banding together and impeaching Bush before the midterms. Jefferson was used as an example of what will happen to them if they try to make a move.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. this smells smells smells like a sham
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC