Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Britain to put in more troops as attacks mount

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 08:29 AM
Original message
Britain to put in more troops as attacks mount
Edited on Sun Jul-09-06 08:30 AM by Joanne98
Britain to put in more troops as attacks mount

By Marie Woolf and Raymond Whitaker
Published: 09 July 2006

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/asia/article1168219.ece
Britain's beleaguered troops in southern Afghanistan are to be heavily reinforced after a request from defence chiefs. Des Browne, the Secretary of State for Defence, will tell the Commons this week that a force of up to 1,000 soldiers, including combat troops and logistical support, will be urgently sent to the country.

Military commanders put in a formal request for extra support last Thursday after British forces in Helmand, Afghanistan's main opium poppy-growing area and one of the country's most lawless provinces, came under sustained attack from resurgent Taliban forces.

Six British soldiers have been killed in Afghanistan over the past three weeks. The Muslim funeral of one of them, L/Cpl Jabron Hashmi, was held yesterday at the Central Jamia Mosque in Small Heath, Birmingham.

The reinforcements are thought to be coming from the 16 Air Assault Brigade, which already forms the core of the 3,300-strong force deployed in Helmand. They will be backed by logistical staff, who will replace around 800 military engineers who have been building the main base at Lashkar Gah, the capital of Helmand, and forward bases in the province.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. So, dumping more resources into the fight that should have been fought
because the fight that was unnecessary drained so many resouces from this one it was unwinnable.

My description of Afganistan in one convoluted sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I guess the rumors about Afganistan heating up are true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. This whole disaster is convoluted
thanks to Lord Pissypants. He never cared about Afghanistan anyway. He wanted to invade Iraq, and wanted to invade even before he stole the first election. If he had concentrated on eliminating Al Qaeda in Afghanistan, many, many more of our troops would be alive today, and Iraq would not be exploding in civil war as it is today. Now he has two fiascoes on his hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. And itching to start a third.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Oh, yeah
He wants to invade Iran so much, and he really doesn't care if the Middle East explodes, as long as America ends up controlling the oil. He's willing to have millions of other people pay for what he wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Bush didn't want the war to end in early 2002 with Bin Laden's capture
Bush always wanted to exploit 9-11 in order to push his radical imperialist agenda through a compliant Congress. Had the military gone into Afghanistan immediately after 9-11, rather than wait a full month to invade, it would have obliterated Al-Qaeda and its leadership. This is not the result that Bush wanted. Bush wanted to take over the oil fields of Iraq and dictate OPEC policy through a puppet regime in Baghdad. So as soon as Kabul was under our control and neocon Karzai put in place, Al-Qaeda stopped being a concern, and Bush was able to divert resources to his main target, Iraq.

Bush needs Bin Laden as much as Bin Laden needs Bush!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I agree completely, IG
I remain mystified, however, at the inability of so many Americans to see through the charade. Getting Bush installed as president for the purpose of invading Iraq was the goal of the PNACers all along. I think that's why they tried so desperately to get Clinton impeached, they felt that he set their goals back, and were not happy about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. They might as well caption it "Britain wading deeper into the quicksand."
If we, the U.S., had enough people there to take actual control I could see Britain sending more troops but under the current circumstances as currently set up by the U.S., it really doesn't make Blair look very bright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. All because * handlers wanted to go to Iraq and have a war president.
Afghanistan would be three years into democracy and not growing a poppy if the USA had stuck with fighting the people who attacked them on 9/11. Instead..they rang and ran. To Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AbsoluteArmorer Donating Member (223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bush's Afghan blunder
has become Canada and Britain's nightmare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. Britain's already gotten its ass kicked in Afghanistan and Iraq before
This must be a lot of fun for any Brit with a scrap of knowledge of history...

Some corner of a foreign field that is forever England.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC