Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Navy Judge Criticizes Rape Case Witnesses

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 09:37 PM
Original message
Navy Judge Criticizes Rape Case Witnesses
A Navy judge chastised prosecutors Thursday at the court-martial of a former Naval Academy football quarterback charged with rape, saying their witnesses have been weak.

After he refused to let a nurse testify about the medical effect of rape and strictly limited what a psychiatrist could say about the mental state of rape victims, Navy Cmdr. John Maksym criticized prosecutors for what he called "the anemic nature" of their witnesses.

It was unclear whether the judge was referring to all the prosecution witnesses, which include the woman who said Lamar Owens Jr. raped her in her dorm room early on Jan. 29.

But Maksym was especially critical of expert witnesses prosecutors called to rebut questions raised by Owens' attorneys about why the woman didn't cry out that night and didn't immediately notify authorities.
They included an Army psychiatrist who testified briefly that some victims delay their reporting and many don't ever tell authorities about sexual assaults. The judge noted the psychiatrist was just two weeks into a psychiatry fellowship at Walter Reed Army Medical Center.

"Is there no more?" Maksym asked prosecutors. "Come on. The chap just got out of his residency. We're not talking about the son of Freud here."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/13/AR2006071301626.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is typical of the military and the issue of rape....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Not just the military thinks this way. They just have the power to control
the evidence presented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. That "judge" is way out of line. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. A psychiatrist just out of residency? That one's fair.
Not speaking to the rest, but it's not like the judge was out of bounds on that one. As he said, we're not talking the son of Freud here.

Not that I see anything wrong with the content of the testimony, mind you...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. not so
he had 4 years of psychiatry and was accepted for a fellowship...that's further study into psych.
His four year residency certainly qualified him. The judge is NUTS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I see..
Four year residency... that kind of diminishes the argument that being two weeks removed from it is a big deal..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'll bet the judge attended a few Tail Hook Conventions
One more reason why military courts are not the proper venue for this sort of crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Doubt it, by the time this guy was coming up, TAILHOOK was done for
This guy isn't senior enough to have been around then. Remember, he's a JAG--they go from 0-1 to 0-3 in a year.

I think he's probably a football fan, myself:

Owens led Navy's football team to an 8-4 record last fall that included victories over military academy rivals Air Force and Army and a victory in the Poinsettia Bowl over Colorado State.

He was the team's most valuable player but did not graduate along with his class in the spring because of the criminal investigation.


Oh, and quite likely he's an asshole, too...!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. Whats the Judge name?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 04:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. The military really knows how to put the "kangaroo" in court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 04:19 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. MILITARY JUSTICE IS TO JUSTICE
AS MILITARY MUSIC IS TO MUSIC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. I remember that one. A book title, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Picked it up some where ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. The quote's supposed to be "martial law" isn't it?
Just saying. If this is a prime example of military justice then your comment may similarly ring true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC