Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Novak Says Plame/Wilson Suit Will Be Dismissed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 08:11 PM
Original message
Novak Says Plame/Wilson Suit Will Be Dismissed
Edited on Fri Jul-14-06 08:21 PM by sabra

http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlDC/television/novak_says_plamewilson_suit_will_be_dismissed_40185.asp

Novak Says Plame/Wilson Suit Will Be Dismissed

In an interview to be aired this weekend on Bloomberg's "Political Capital with Al Hunt," Bob Novak says that the civil suit Plame and her husband brought against Vice President Cheney, his former aide and White House adviser Karl Rove probably will probably be thrown out.

...

MR. HUNT: - for the last word. Valerie Plame and her husband have filed a suit against Vice President Cheney, Karl Rove, one of your sources, the indicted Cheney aide, Scooter Libby. What are you going to do if they try to haul you before that trial and get you to identify the one you source you haven't identified?

MR. NOVAK: Well, that would be the whole question of whether I would even adhere to a subpoena. I am sure there will be motions to throw this suit out of court. the lawyers I talk to say that this is a very unusual case, and I think that the Wilsons may have trouble maintaining this suit; not having it thrown out.

MR. HUNT: A number of people who would defend not only your right to publish a column but say, hey, there was - (inaudible) - still ask, why was it necessary to identify her and the fact that she was a CIA operative.

MR. NOVAK: When I talked to the primary source on a long - hour-long interview about - covering many things, I got into the question, which was the hot story of the time, of the ambassador's mission to Niger. And in the course of it I said, why in the world would they send - would the CIA send Joe Wilson there? He has not an intelligence background, he hasn't had any contact in Africa for a long time. I just know then that he is also an anti-Bush partisan. So my source said, well, his wife, who works for the Counterproliferation Division of the CIA suggested it.




What would Poppy have to say about this...


http://www.metrosantacruz.com/metro-santa-cruz/04.19.06/wilson-0616.html

A former diplomat whom George Bush Sr. once introduced to his war cabinet as "a true American hero,"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. He's PRAYING it's dismissed
because if it goes to trial he's held up in public as the stinking traitor he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fuck Novakula. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Isn't Plame suggested Wilson a discredited lie?
Hmm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Biernuts Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. No, although Wilson said it wasn't true, the bipartisan 9-11 commission
found to the contrary that it was in fact true - and not one of the Democrats on the commission non-concurred with that finding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. The 9/11 commission's findings are in the toilet
The commission wasn't given crucial information, at the admission of Cheney et al. It has been clearly proven that Valerie Plame had nothing to do with her husband's being sent to Niger. As a former ambassador to the middle east, in addition to his other expertise, Wilson was an obvious choice.

Novak's lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Biernuts Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. (Co Chair) Lee Hamilton is impeccable and he had full testimony
from those involved in sending Wilson to Niger. Regardless of anything happening subsequent to Wilson's trip doesn't alter circumstances leading up to it. There really isn't a valid controversy on this point.

No matter what happened later in State, CIA or the WH, Wilson took a trip in which his wife had a major part initiating. When we dig in on relatively minor positions that are easy to disprove definitively, it affects the overall credibility of the debate.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
19. she did suggest him...
but had no authority to send him, others did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Very good. Thanks.
:thumbsup: :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. hes not an anti bush partisan. he is an anti lying scumbag traitor patriot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Douchebag. nt
Edited on Fri Jul-14-06 08:26 PM by onehandle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Why does anyone even listen to Novak any more?
He should crawl back down that hole he popped up from a week or so ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Exactly.....
Did he attend Law School? Pass the Bar? Oh yeah, he's a republican backed reporter! Fuck him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. but isn't kind of cute...
the way he's trying to make himself relevant again?

:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Biernuts Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. Regardless of whether it's dismissed - taxpayers get the bill
Here's what it says on the DOJ Website, specifically the Civil Division, headed up by an Assistant Attorney General, Prencipal Deputy Assistand Attorney General and with 5 Deputy Assistant Attornies General and "more fucking lawyers than Bill Gates has" (I creatively added the last part)

"Defend the government and its officers and employees in lawsuits seeking damages from the U.S. Treasury or from individuals personally."

source: <http://www.justice.gov/jmd/mps/manual/civil.htm>

If it does go to trial, they don't need to prove "beyond a reasonable doubt" like in Libby's criminal trial. "Preponderance of the evidence" is the standard in federal civil cases.
source: <http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/mow/guidebook/civil.html>

But Novak may be right and dismiss the case against the three, leaving only the US Government as sole respondent. The Case on point regarding personal immunity for government officials is Harlow v. Fitzgerald <http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=457&page=818> Objectively, they have no realistic chance keeping the case against Cheney from being dropped and a slim chance, I'd judge less than 25%, of a judge keeping Libby & Rove PERSONALLY in the case.

Any idea why they didn't sue Novak's primary source (reported to be Former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage) and the CIA Public Affairs officer who confirmed her Agency employment?
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/13/AR2006031301904.html>

And yep, guess who pays any damages in any case? Start saving for that tax increase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Best Damn Investment
why try?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bilgewaterbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Do you think they are going to subpoena Fitz..
in order to find the identity of the original leaker? Can they even do that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Sounds like you really don't want this explored. Wonder why not?
I am curious as to whether members of our government may have engaged in treasonous activity. Well worth the money. Much more valuable than the bills we're gonna get for this non-sensical war, gay marriage amendments and flag burning foolishness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
22. It would be money well spent by the government
to have the entire fraudulent government exposed. Better to spend taxpayer money on this than the ongoing lie of Iraq.

This case is a slam dunk winner for Plame. The government has no valid defense in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lochloosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 08:55 PM
Original message
Novak makes it sound like it was just second hand info....
just a passing remark....

which begs the question.....

WHY DID YOU WRITE THE SECOND ARTICLE EXPOSING BREWSTER JENNINGS?

TRAITOR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biscotti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. His explanations change
day to day. He has told so many different versions he can't keep his lies straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. so now novak is a lawyer with the ability to predict the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. Novak's gonna' die from arteriosclerosis soon, Maybe, tomorrow.
Or could be Hastfart's skin disease is gonna' get him or maybe he'll walk across the street and get crushed by a bus. Who knows?

I won't wail when he goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
18. "the whole question of whether I would even adhere to a subpoena."
and then the bit about "I just know then that he is also an anti-Bush partisan."?
this right AFTER he said she 'outed herself'? the poor deluded schmo can't even keep his story straight!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 03:22 AM
Response to Original message
21. In his dreams.
:popcorn:

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
24. Spoken like a coconspirator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC