Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheney: National security top priority (criticizes NYT)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 02:08 PM
Original message
Cheney: National security top priority (criticizes NYT)
\
http://www.crgazette.com/2006/07/17/Home/cheney.htm

Cheney: National security top priority

DES MOINES, IA - Vice President Dick Cheney said Monday that the war on terror should be a top priority in this year's midterm election, warning that Democrats can't be trusted to keep the nation safe.

...

"The president and I welcome the discussion,'' Cheney said. "Every voter needs to know where every candidate for federal office stands.''

...

Cheney also criticized news organizations, which have published secret information about the government's monitoring of terrorist activities. He said publication of the information makes it more difficult to protect America.

...

"These kind of stories simply alert the terrorists as to what we're doing,'' Cheney said. "The leak to the New York Times and the publishing of those leaks are very damaging to the national interests.''


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. same ol, same ol..............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Mr. Cheney, in your own words, "Fuck yourself."
It's the Republicans who can't be trusted to keep the nation safe.

Under Republican leadership, 9/11 was allowed to happen. We all know about the PDB warning that terrorists were determined to attack us using air craft, to which the REPUBLICANS DID NOTHING IN RESPONSE.

We've seen the mess the REPUBLICANS have created over in Iraq.

We've seen how willing REPUBLICANS have been to sell off our ports to a country we shouldn't trust. We know we shouldn't trust them because REPUBLICANS TOLD US SO.

So, go Fuck Yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. cheney's job 1 is making money for halliburton war profiteers
he is incredibly disengenuous to say that terrorists have no clue we are spying on them in every way possible until they read about it a bush administration approved article in the NYT or Wall Street Journal.

Msongs
www.msongs.com/6for2008.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. What an idiot ...
"These kind of stories simply alert the terrorists as to what we're doing."

Yeah, Dick-wad, I'm sure no one WOULD EVER have guessed someone might tap their phones, or look into their banking transactions - things even small-time crooks have known since the dawn of banking and the invention of the telephone.

I think Dick spends too much time with Bush. As a result, he's come to believe that EVERYONE is THAT stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. By the way,What ever happenned to that spy who downloaded classified
information in Cheney's office?

It was in the paper then the story died.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Mr. 18% popularity comes out of hiding to yell at everyone.
Edited on Mon Jul-17-06 03:41 PM by w4rma
Noone likes or listens to this guy anymore except to find out what sinister scheme or con he's working on next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. *yawn* that's old news, shotgun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Gee, 911 happened under a repig for a president.
Sounds like the typical hypocrisy. It's amazing the devil hasn't come for his soul yet. Mr. Cheney, I'm sure you're needed in hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. Go fuck yourself, murdering asshole
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 03:02 AM
Response to Original message
10. Two words Mr Cheney
"Horse Hockey"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. two more words for cheney
which he used on senator leahy, FUCK YOU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
11. "national security" = protecting Americans, right?
So why the hell don't you care about the 25,000 Americans trapped in Lebanon, Mr. Cheney?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
12. If national security was his top priority, why did he cherry pick intel to
Edited on Tue Jul-18-06 07:34 AM by mod mom
start a war which caused a huge proliferation of terrorism and a massive debt? His actions are about profiteering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
13. I just hope Americans will not fall into the trap
of Cheney's cry for FEAR, FEAR AND MORE FEAR.

Hopefully, Americans know they have been through this before, we are more suspectible to terror now than before we are making many enemies no thanks to these thugs in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maeve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
15. What about the Wall Street Journal?
Only "leaks" printed in "leftie" papers are to be feared, right, Dick?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cureautismnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
16. Really? Outing a CIA Agent to exact revenge against her husband and ...
... leaking classified information to bolster your rush-to-war defense were in the best interests of "national security"? Your personal security is top priority and trumps American security, bunker-boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Bush/Cheney leaked the ID of the Al Queda double agent for political
Edited on Tue Jul-18-06 08:59 AM by Catrina
purposes before the 2004 election. He was the only human 'mole' intelligence agencies had and Bush et al blew his cover in 2004 infuriating British and Pakistani intelligence agencies.

Check out this excellent diary from Daily Kos ~ this leak may have led to the London bombing! Every news outlet in the country should be asking Cheney about this. I hope the NYT will publish a reminder of this, the worst national security leak in the past few years.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/7/17/92933/1106

From Juan Cole, linked in the above diary:

It turns out that both the United Kingdom and Pakistan are extremely angry with Bush for going public with the details gleaned from the computers of Khan and Ghailani.


In an article for the Observer, British Home Secretary David Blunkett lashed out at the Bush White House over last Sunday's announcement by Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge of an old al-Qaeda plot against financial institutions in New York and Washington. Blunkett writes, ...it is important to be able to distinguish if there is a meaningful contribution that helps to secure us from terrorism. And to understand if there isn't. And there are very good reasons why we shouldn't reveal certain information to the public...


Blunkett's measured tones barely disguise his fury at the Bush administration for having gone public with details that have endangered an ongoing British investigation and forced the premature arrest of twelve suspects, against whom it is not clear a case can be made at this point...


This should be spread far and wide, if Cheney wants to make an issue of 'leaks' that threaten National Security. He must surely want whoever did this prosecuted for treason???


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. The Bush/Cheney team apparently wants us to get nuked.
WHY IN HELL did they compromise our top spy operation to detect movement of nuclear materials????

WHY, Mr. Cheney???

We have a traitorous mafia running our country and the shocking thing is they have over 30% support!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
19. "National Security is top priority"?
Really, Tricky Dick "go fuck yourself" Cheney? Then why are our borders unguarded, & why aren't you having shipping containers inspected, why are busses & trucks not being inspected, why do you want a superhighway that can take hazardous materials straight from Mexico to Canada?

The reason why is because republinazis want another 9/11 to happen.

The traitors in this country are all members of the republinazi party.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bennywhale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Security top priority????
No, thats why democratic countries have a system of checks and balances so security for example can be balanced against other concerns like oooh i dunno freedom, liberty, free speech, a free press. Wacky ideas.

What a fucking moron. If that the case why not just chip us all and chip everyone that enters the country, problem solved.

WHY??? cos that would be a totalitarian nightmare. security is only priority my ass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
21. Childish behavior. He knows as well as everybody else that the
NYT info was well known for years & that if there were any terrorists they would have long ago used other means to shuffle money. I find his posturing on these things to be an insult to the collective intelligence of the citizens of this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laylah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
22. A local LTTE hit
the nail on the head:

Is this the same Dick Cheney who is being sued by Valerie Plame for outing her as a CIA agent to get revenge on her husband for telling the truth about the “yellow cake uranium” in Africa?

Is this the same Dick Cheney whose former employer, Haliburton, through its subsidiary, Kellogg, Brown and Root, is having its no-bid contracts pulled because it charged the military $100 a bag for laundry and $45 a case for soda?

Is this the same Dick Cheney who is chomping at the bit to send our young men and women into battle, but when it was his turn managed to get at least five draft deferments?

http://www.qctimes.com/articles/2006/07/18/opinion/letters/doc44bbf47b13dda650561584.txt#blogcomments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC