This morning brings us:
Guffaw! number 1:
Former Harris Adviser To Talk To AuthoritiesBy KEITH EPSTEIN and WILLIAM MARCH The Tampa Tribune
Published: Jul 20, 2006
WASHINGTON - The former head of Katherine Harris' congressional office staff expects to speak to federal investigators soon concerning the investigation of a congressional bribery scandal, a former Harris aide said Wednesday.
Meanwhile, in a statement issued late Wednesday, the Harris campaign declined to provide specifics about the investigation.
Fred Asbell, who quit in June as chief of staff of Harris' congressional office, says he will speak voluntarily to Department of Justice investigators soon, said Ed Rollins, former consultant to Harris' U.S. Senate campaign.
>snip<
Concerning more than $35,000 the campaign has paid to the Washington law firm she (Harris) hired when she initially was linked to the investigation, she said only that it was for "gathering … all facts necessary" to cooperate.<
http://www.tbo.com/news/metro/MGB1FPJHUPE.html--
and Guffaw! number 2:
Probe moves closer to Harris
Two former aides have become part of the investigation into her dealings with a contractor convicted of bribery. She insists she did nothing wrong.By ANITA KUMAR, Times Staff Writer
Published July 19, 2006
WASHINGTON — One former top aide to Rep. Katherine Harris has been questioned and a second soon will be amid an escalating inquiry into the relationship between the congresswoman and a defense contractor.
Investigators with the Justice and Defense departments, along with the FBI and a federal grand jury, are examining Harris’ dealings with Mitchell Wade, who made illegal campaign contributions and later asked her to help secure $10-million in federal money for his company.
>snip<
>Harris said federal officials recently told her attorney that she was not a target of the investigation into Wade, who admitted bribing a California congressman who also pleaded guilty. But Harris refused to answer questions, including who told her she was not a target or when.
Former federal prosecutors say her vague statement doesn’t necessarily mean she’s in the clear.
“If she’s not a target, that’s nice, but that doesn’t mean she’s not under scrutiny,” said Ed Page, a former federal prosecutor who works at the Carlton Fields law firm in Tampa. “It’s sort of a play on words.”<
http://www.sptimes.com/2006/07/19/State/Probe_moves_closer_to.shtmlsoup ---> throwing in a few *snickers* to go with the Guffaw!s